tag:danbooru.me,2005:/commentsComments on post #29605592018-07-23T00:08:20-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/18367272018-07-22T23:58:40-04:002018-07-23T00:08:20-04:00@Squishy on post #2960559 ( original drawn by erikku_(kata235))<img src="/cdn_image/preview/71/7c/717c15babd2a8b70f6471156167b16c7.jpg"/>
<p>This isn't my cup of tea but I can see the technical competence in this piece.</p><p>Note: Looks like the artist continued this scenario on their Pixiv.</p>
Squishy/users/58443tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/17753752017-12-20T17:27:00-05:002017-12-20T17:27:00-05:00@feline_lump on post #2960559 ( original drawn by erikku_(kata235))<img src="/cdn_image/preview/71/7c/717c15babd2a8b70f6471156167b16c7.jpg"/>
<p>Kinda late to the discussion, but I have to agree that this is a notch below most of the recent active posts in the guro tag. The two girls on the left look fine, but the arms, face, and legs on the girl on the right look all kinds of awkward, and the perspective is very inconsistent (which is weird, <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="http://danbooru.me/posts/2835177">since the artist did a competent job with this before</a>).</p>
feline_lump/users/343288tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/17753012017-12-20T10:58:39-05:002017-12-20T10:58:39-05:00@user_525419 on post #2960559 ( original drawn by erikku_(kata235)) <img src="/cdn_image/preview/71/7c/717c15babd2a8b70f6471156167b16c7.jpg"/>
<blockquote>
<p>ion288 said:</p>
<p>Oh, I agree that the quality is fine but it is not exceptional. I probably should have written my original comment as "I dont think this have" to signify it is my opinion rather than an absolute fact. </p>
<p>As a side note. Despite being the by far most prolific flagger currently on the site I did not flag this. I wrote my comment as a support of the flag. There are far worse posts with the guru tag.</p>
</blockquote><p>If that's the case and when there are no real anatomical or quality issues then I won't support the flag on this post. </p>
user_525419/users/525419tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/17752882017-12-20T10:37:21-05:002017-12-20T10:37:21-05:00@ion288 on post #2960559 ( original drawn by erikku_(kata235))<img src="/cdn_image/preview/71/7c/717c15babd2a8b70f6471156167b16c7.jpg"/>
<p>Oh, I agree that the quality is fine but it is not exceptional. I probably should have written my original comment as "I dont think this have" to signify it is my opinion rather than an absolute fact. </p><p>As a side note. Despite being the by far most prolific flagger currently on the site I did not flag this. I wrote my comment as a support of the flag. There are far worse posts with the guru tag. </p>
ion288/users/190759tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/17752182017-12-20T05:14:52-05:002017-12-20T05:14:52-05:00@user_525419 on post #2960559 ( original drawn by erikku_(kata235)) <img src="/cdn_image/preview/71/7c/717c15babd2a8b70f6471156167b16c7.jpg"/>
<blockquote>
<p>ion288 said:</p>
<p>This does not have the exceptional quality required for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-1" href="/artists/show_or_new?name=guru">guru</a> images on Danbooru.</p>
</blockquote><p>What exactly is this post lacking, though <a href="/users?name=ion288">@ion288</a> ? <br>See, I also dislike <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/guro">guro</a> most of the times, but this doesn't look that bad at first sight. </p>
user_525419/users/525419tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/17751852017-12-20T03:05:23-05:002017-12-20T03:05:23-05:00@ion288 on post #2960559 ( original drawn by erikku_(kata235))<img src="/cdn_image/preview/71/7c/717c15babd2a8b70f6471156167b16c7.jpg"/>
<p>This does not have the exceptional quality required for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-1" href="/artists/show_or_new?name=guru">guru</a> images on Danbooru.</p>
ion288/users/190759