tag:danbooru.me,2005:/comments 2019-02-24T08:48:54-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/1897015 2019-02-24T08:48:54-05:00 2019-02-24T08:48:54-05:00 <img src="/cdn_image/preview/69/db/69db36d2907884ebca0af9d8a9b010f7.jpg"/> <blockquote> <p>dailang said:</p> <p>He did not refute the overreacting causing the action, he prove that the werewolf is relatively sane AFTER fransform as the evidence: he was at least have some control.</p> <p>The conclusive evidence is the bite mark that show she was bitten by a completely transformed werewolf, not a half tranformed one. Since the victim was bitten after he completely transform, he is lying.</p> <p>Now the judge can continue to ask the werewolf to tell her his side of the story again, the truth this time and the lawer on the werewolf side can help as well.</p> </blockquote><p>The werewolf-guy said that he was attacked first (which is a lie), then bit her. This ("attack after being soundly provoked") and what lawyer-guy is doing (make him "attack just by standing in front of him") for the sake of his argumentation are completely different circumstances. </p><p>Would someone punch someone else after being punched? Would someone punch someone else who's just standing in front of them though?</p><p>It seems to me lawyer-guy just built a straw man argument.</p> Darkagma /users/353716 tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/1896971 2019-02-24T02:56:45-05:00 2019-02-24T02:56:45-05:00 <img src="/cdn_image/preview/69/db/69db36d2907884ebca0af9d8a9b010f7.jpg"/> <blockquote> <p>Darkagma said:</p> <p>Wouldn't this be considered insufficient counterproof for the insanity argument, considering lawyer-guy's not overreacting in a way that could trigger an instinctive self-defense action from the werewolf-guy?</p> </blockquote><p>He did not refute the overreacting causing the action, he prove that the werewolf is relatively sane AFTER fransform as the evidence: he was at least have some control.</p><p>The conclusive evidence is the bite mark that show she was bitten by a completely transformed werewolf, not a half tranformed one. Since the victim was bitten after he completely transform, he is lying.</p><p>Now the judge can continue to ask the werewolf to tell her his side of the story again, the truth this time and the lawer on the werewolf side can help as well.</p> dailang /users/345827 tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/1889414 2019-01-26T21:25:30-05:00 2019-01-26T21:25:30-05:00 <img src="/cdn_image/preview/69/db/69db36d2907884ebca0af9d8a9b010f7.jpg"/> <p>Wouldn't this be considered insufficient counterproof for the insanity argument, considering lawyer-guy's not overreacting in a way that could trigger an instinctive self-defense action from the werewolf-guy?</p> Darkagma /users/353716