Comments on commenter:lkjh098

@Pepsiman666 on post #1855305 (onjouji toki and shimizudani ryuuka (saki and 1 more) drawn by rantefu_(ranteru))

2020-01-01T16:53:34-05:00

i know if tjis is a futanari or a pussy to ass

@Pepsiman666 on post #1855305 (onjouji toki and shimizudani ryuuka (saki and 1 more) drawn by rantefu_(ranteru))

2019-11-26T06:04:16-05:00

it just are drying humping his vaginas after shaving his vagina onjouji and shimizudani has to do the dry humping to no longer had pubic hair

@NWSiaCB on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-10T02:46:14-04:00

Nipply said:

That's some selective memory.

2009: Rules exclude breasts as large as the body.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090208203139//static/terms_of_service

2010: Rules exclude 2+ heads.
https://web.archive.org/web/20101123120935//static/terms_of_service

2011: Rules exclude 3+ heads.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110901205648//static/terms_of_service

IMO the rules should never have changed from "as large as the body", if for no other reason then because it's actually enforceable instead of causing silly heads debates.

And anyways, for example, there are probably way more people who find futanari repulsive than people who are repulsed by oversized breasts (that in this case don't even reach the navel!) I've never really understood why one should have a blanket ban but not the other.

Or in other words, it's true.

The thing about ludicrously huge breasts is that unless it's done entirely as a gag, then the sort of people who draw without the slightest regard for realism in breasts tends to draw without realism for the rest of the body. The rules were absurd early on, and I have a distrust of someone changing the rules literally just to win an argument, since that doesn't make a good foundation for future arbitration.

As far as futanari goes, I wouldn't know without looking it up, but I'd suspect there are more people who actively search it out than would look for ludicrously huge breasts, since that's the other aspect that has to be considered - how many people are looking for it as opposed to people are upset by it. This is why, say, guro tends to be on thin ice, since few people look for it but there are plenty of people seriously distraught by it.

@Nipply on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-10T01:11:24-04:00

NWSiaCB said:

Back a few years ago, the rules excluded breasts 2 heads large. When someone flagged a post for breaking that ratio that one of the admins liked, the rules suddenly changed to three heads.

That's some selective memory.

2009: Rules exclude breasts as large as the body.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090208203139//static/terms_of_service

2010: Rules exclude 2+ heads.
https://web.archive.org/web/20101123120935//static/terms_of_service

2011: Rules exclude 3+ heads.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110901205648//static/terms_of_service

IMO the rules should never have changed from "as large as the body", if for no other reason then because it's actually enforceable instead of causing silly heads debates.

And anyways, for example, there are probably way more people who find futanari repulsive than people who are repulsed by oversized breasts (that in this case don't even reach the navel!) I've never really understood why one should have a blanket ban but not the other.

@NWSiaCB on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-09T21:13:09-04:00

lkjh098 said:

The rules excluded breasts three heads large. 1-2 heads was huge_breasts, and 2-3 heads was gigantic_breasts.

Back a few years ago, the rules excluded breasts 2 heads large. When someone flagged a post for breaking that ratio that one of the admins liked, the rules suddenly changed to three heads.

@lkjh098 on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-09T18:25:57-04:00

NWSiaCB said:

Remember when the rules excluded breasts two heads large?...

Well, also that face looks like a Picasso, and the back looks really weird, too...

The rules excluded breasts three heads large. 1-2 heads was huge_breasts, and 2-3 heads was gigantic_breasts.

@lkjh098 on post #3532446 (reisalin stout (atelier and 1 more) drawn by harukigenia)

2019-06-09T18:21:50-04:00

Is there a tag for poorly photoshopped backgrounds?

@Lacrimosa on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-09T05:23:27-04:00

cokerpilot said:

Only one image...

Just a single glance at the tag and i see tons of pics with arguagly larger more unweildly breasts in them compared to this.

You mean one active upload that would also attract 8 poor quality marks by the approvers? I really doubt that.

@NWSiaCB on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-08T16:33:40-04:00

Remember when the rules excluded breasts two heads large?...

Well, also that face looks like a Picasso, and the back looks really weird, too...

@cokerpilot on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-08T15:12:46-04:00

Lacrimosa said:

Why should I blacklist perfectly fine tags only because one image under this tag is flaggable? Makes no sense.

Only one image...

Just a single glance at the tag and i see tons of pics with arguagly larger more unweildly breasts in them compared to this.

@Lacrimosa on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-08T10:42:28-04:00

Why should I blacklist perfectly fine tags only because one image under this tag is flaggable? Makes no sense.

@chilled_sake on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-08T03:56:30-04:00

It's the arms too, which are poor quality.

@Guaro1238 on post #3529668 ( drawn by kawahagi-tei)

2019-06-07T17:58:00-04:00

Soul-crushing mind-breaking sight-blinding breasts

Is maybe one of the best things I´ve read so far as a flag

@lkjh098 on post #3522041 (kyaru (princess connect! and 1 more) drawn by noto_kurumi)

2019-05-31T10:44:20-04:00

OOZ662 said:

Some people get tired of the fisheye lens that magically doesn't have spherical distortion. Though at least this one tries with depth of field. Bad perspective would work fine over a flag, though, I suppose.

A fisheye lens without spherical distortion is just a wide angle lens.

@OOZ662 on post #3522041 (kyaru (princess connect! and 1 more) drawn by noto_kurumi)

2019-05-30T14:17:39-04:00

lkjh098 said:

I'm getting a bit annoyed by how many people flag posts for "bad anatomy" when it's clearly just perspective.

Some people get tired of the fisheye lens that magically doesn't have spherical distortion. Though at least this one tries with depth of field. Bad perspective would work fine over a flag, though, I suppose.

@lkjh098 on post #3522041 (kyaru (princess connect! and 1 more) drawn by noto_kurumi)

2019-05-30T10:16:14-04:00

I'm getting a bit annoyed by how many people flag posts for "bad anatomy" when it's clearly just perspective.

@lkjh098 on post #3215339 ( original drawn by oobaa_rain)

2018-08-06T09:54:30-04:00

Preemptive "No, this does not violate the rules, breasts more than three heads in size are discouraged but no longer prohibited."

@lkjh098 on post #3163644 ( original drawn by masafumi)

2018-06-22T03:50:55-04:00

-abraxas- said:

pretty sure thats just some ornate bondage furnature with a regular human girl tied to it.

It's a statue of a mermaid, with a human girl making up the human part of the statue. Since the overall sculpture is of a mermaid, and sculptures are generally tagged with what they're a sculpture of if they're the focus of the picture (post #1262792, post #1580818), I think the mermaid tag is appropriate.

@-abraxas- on post #3163644 ( original drawn by masafumi)

2018-06-17T20:02:51-04:00

pretty sure thats just some ornate bondage furnature with a regular human girl tied to it.

@lkjh098 on post #3112852 (yorha no. 2 type b (nier and 1 more) drawn by watanabe_yasuaki)

2018-05-04T16:57:52-04:00

This is clearly not rating:safe. You can see her nipples through her leotard.