Danbooru

[bulk] Tag Implication: *_pants -> pants

Posted under Tags

create implication jeans -> pants
create implication baggy_pants -> pants
create implication black_pants -> pants
create implication capri_pants -> pants
create implication cargo_pants -> pants
create implication harem_pants -> pants
create implication leather_pants -> pants
create implication leather_pants -> leather
create implication striped_pants -> pants
create implication striped_pants -> striped
create implication sweatpants -> pants
create implication track_pants -> pants
create implication torn_pants -> pants
create implication pants_rolled_up -> pants

Link to request

These are all tags with at least 50 posts describing specific types of pants.

Not included are

because I spotted some posts where they were used for shorts or other bottoms. They could be cleaned up but maybe it would be better to alias them to more general names like hand in bottoms instead?

evazion said:

because I spotted some posts where they were used for shorts or other bottoms. They could be cleaned up but maybe it would be better to alias them to more general names like hand in bottoms instead?

"Bottoms" sounds awkward and less clear than pants. Even if pants isn't a 100% accurate name because shorts and such are included in the tags I think it's fine to leave those tags as is without renaming/changing them. We already have a number of tags like that (e.g. no_panties is not limited to panties).

  • 1