create alias real_xxiii -> 23_(real_xxiii)
create alias real_xxiii's_dark_skinned_girl -> 23's_dark-skinned_girl
create alias real_xxiii's_ahoge_girl -> 23's_ahoge_girl
create alias real_xxiii's_flat_chested_girl -> 23's_flat-chested_girl
create alias real_xxiii's_brown_haired_girl -> 23's_brown-haired_girl
create alias rafaela_(real_xxiii) -> rafaela_(23)
create alias akane_(real_xxiii) -> akane_(23)

Link to request

Artist has always used the name 23. real xxiii was only ever used as a pixiv account login and only appeared in image URL links (i.e. http://i2.pixiv.net/img04/img/real_xxiii/). Display name on pixiv and Twitter is 23. Credited as 23 on commercial works at http://www.saberfish.jp/works27.html, http://www.5bit.net/WFG.html, http://g.e-hentai.org/s/26f58a407e/487204-1 and http://g.e-hentai.org/s/c79e6daf6f/591207-1.

+1.

+1. Also, sorry I missed this post before creating mine. Your reasoning is a lot more substantial for the change.

Just as a question since I noticed it; Why the underscore to dash change? Not saying it's incorrect in the slightest, just kind of a curiousity going from "dark_skinned_girl" to "dark-skinned_girl" being stuck in there.

And in that case should "23’s_dark_skinned_girl" be aliased to "23’s_dark-skinned_girl"? Just thinking about it randomly really.

Saduharta said:

Just as a question since I noticed it; Why the underscore to dash change? Not saying it's incorrect in the slightest, just kind of a curiousity going from "dark_skinned_girl" to "dark-skinned_girl" being stuck in there.

And in that case should "23’s_dark_skinned_girl" be aliased to "23’s_dark-skinned_girl"? Just thinking about it randomly really.

AFAIK grammar, the hyphen denotes possession.

There's no auto-generated message that this request was rejected? I didn't have any input on this one, but this looked like the one that was going to be approved since it was agreed on (even by the creator of the previous aliases).

Request was deleted entirely for some reason (maybe it was purged when the other one was approved?.) I'm pretty sure mods can approve bulk edits anyways.

EB said:

There's no auto-generated message that this request was rejected?

Seems to be an oversight that rejecting bulk requests doesn't do that though rejecting aliases/implications does create one, fixed

The other thread was approved so why was this one rejected, if that's the case? o.O

remove alias 23_(real_xxiii) -> real_xxiii
create alias real_xxiii -> 23_(real_xxiii)
create alias real_xxiii's_dark_skinned_girl -> dark-skinned_girl_(23)
create alias real_xxiii's_ahoge_girl -> ahoge_girl_(23)
create alias real_xxiii's_flat_chested_girl -> flat-chested_girl_(23)
create alias real_xxiii's_brown_haired_girl -> brown-haired_girl_(23)
create alias rafaela_(real_xxiii) -> rafaela_(23)
create alias akane_(real_xxiii) -> akane_(23)

Link to request

Redo of OP's post.
(edited as below)

Kikimaru said:
create alias real_xxiii's_dark_skinned_girl -> 23's_dark-skinned_girl
create alias real_xxiii's_ahoge_girl -> 23's_ahoge_girl
create alias real_xxiii's_flat_chested_girl -> 23's_flat-chested_girl
create alias real_xxiii's_brown_haired_girl -> 23's_brown-haired_girl
Redo of OP's post.

Just for consistency, I'd suggest these four should instead be:

create alias real_xxiii's_dark_skinned_girl -> dark-skinned_girl_(23)
create alias real_xxiii's_ahoge_girl -> ahoge_girl_(23)
create alias real_xxiii's_flat_chested_girl -> flat-chested_girl_(23)
create alias real_xxiii's_brown_haired_girl -> brown-haired_girl_(23)

Link to request

The bulk update request #216 has been approved.

The bulk update request #217 has been rejected.

The bulk update request #217 has been rejected.

The bulk update request #217 has been rejected.

So now these are inconsistent with every other original character across the site just for consistency within the artist themselves? Urgh.

[artist]'s_[description] for unnamed characters
[character name]_([artist]) for named characters

It's been this way for 3 years if not more.

My bad then, I was not aware of this. Is there a reason for this distinction or is it merely aesthetic? Because from a cursory look through the list of original characters, it doesn't seem like it is particularly adhered to.

It's both aesthetic and to make it clear that the character is not referred to by the artist as [description]. I don't remember the specific discussion that brought this about because it's been so long but it might have actually been real's characters.

When a character has a unique enough name people tend to not bother attaching an artist's name. Most of the pages on the list are linked with the artist's name hidden since they're listed under headers so it's also kind of deceptive.

If you want to create another batch, go right ahead.

Just noticed the artist info status for 23 (real xxiii) is marked as deleted, while real xxiii is active. However, shouldn't it be the other way around now that 23 (real xxiii) is the official tag? Shouldn't 23 (real xxiii) artist info be active and real xxiii's one say: "the following tag is aliase to ..."?