create implication heart_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication star_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication tattooed_breast -> tattoo
create implication back_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication sun_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication barcode_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication tribal_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication slave_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication butterfly_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication leg_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication pubic_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication chest_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication neck_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication number_tattoo -> tattoo

Link to request

Also, include

tattooed_breast
back_tattoo
sun_tattoo
barcode_tattoo
tribal_tattoo
slave_tattoo
butterfly_tattoo
leg_tattoo
pubic_tattoo
chest_tattoo
neck_tattoo
number_tattoo

Thanks, I updated it.

The bulk update request #271 has been approved.

The womb tattoo tag is about a month old now, but I want to ask, is it necessary? Its description seems to overlap with pubic tattoo and stomach tattoo, and most examples of womb tattoo were in fact already tagged pubic tattoo. Is there a use for this tag that wouldn't be served as well by one of the older tags?

Sorry for bumping a year-old thread, but this topic seemed pertinent enough.

create alias tattooed_breast -> breast_tattoo
create implication tramp_stamp -> back_tattoo
create implication arm_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication shoulder_tattoo -> tattoo
create implication dragon_tattoo -> tattoo

Link to request

Add more unimplicated tags. Also alias tattooed_breast -> breast_tattoo for consistency.

EDIT: removed womb tattoo -> tattoo

iridescent_slime said:

The womb tattoo tag is about a month old now, but I want to ask, is it necessary? Its description seems to overlap with pubic tattoo and stomach tattoo, and most examples of womb tattoo were in fact already tagged pubic tattoo. Is there a use for this tag that wouldn't be served as well by one of the older tags?

A womb tattoo is a design while pubic/stomach tattoos are tattoo locations, so they're not necessarily the same.

Pubic tattoo is what I'm uncertain about. Most, if not all of them, could be considered stomach tattoos.

I feel that stomach tattoos should aim for either more of the stomach or areas on or above the naval, so I don't really think pubic tattoos generally belong under the tag unless the tattoo reaches up to that area as well.

The womb tattoo tag was created recently and its definition indicates it is about the area, so would indeed seem to be redundant with the current pubic tattoo tag. The pubic tattoo tag if necessary can be renamed to pelvic_tattoo if needed (external link - pelvic region area).

evazion said:

A womb tattoo is a design while pubic/stomach tattoos are tattoo locations, so they're not necessarily the same.

That's not how the tag is actually being used, though. Look at post #1753081, post #2220886, and post #2519631 -- the locations are roughly the same but the designs are all different. Those images were all tagged by the tag's creator too, so this isn't a case of multiple people using a tag for dissimilar purposes.

If there are any posts depicting tattoos of, say, an actual uterus, then leaving them tagged womb tattoo would be cool, I guess. Otherwise, the tag is kind of pointless.

What is @Zkaiser thinking about this (the creator)?

Removed womb tattoo from the BUR until we reach a decision on that. Are the other implications agreeable?

+1 to the implications, they all make sense.

Tattooed breast currently implies tattoo. Will that implication carry over to breast tattoo? I'm not sure how aliases work in that regard. Also, should breast tattoo imply chest tattoo?

The bulk update request #934 has been approved.

iridescent_slime said:

That's not how the tag is actually being used, though. Look at post #1753081, post #2220886, and post #2519631 -- the locations are roughly the same but the designs are all different. Those images were all tagged by the tag's creator too, so this isn't a case of multiple people using a tag for dissimilar purposes.

If there are any posts depicting tattoos of, say, an actual uterus, then leaving them tagged womb tattoo would be cool, I guess. Otherwise, the tag is kind of pointless.

I think the point of tags to point out very specific and unique characteristics of a picture. I was unhappy with just a blanket "tattoo" or "stomach_tattoo" tag because they missed the point of what I was looking for. If I search "stomach_tattoo" for example, I'm going to find images of tattoos going around the navel or directly below it.

I'm going to be honest here, I completely missed the "pubic_tattoo" tag and would not mind "womb_tattoo" being folded into that.