create implication jeanne_alter -> ruler_(fate/grand_order)
create implication gilles_de_rais_(fate/grand_order) -> caster_(fate/zero)
create implication tamamo_cat_(fate/grand_order) -> caster_(fate/extra)
create implication fate/prototype:_fragments_of_blue_and_silver -> fate/prototype
create implication henry_jekyll_(fate/grand_order) -> berserker_(fate/prototype_fragments)

Link to request

Alternate versions of same character.

The bulk update request #316 has been approved.

Since April 11 update, Jeanne Alter is now an Avenger. Regarding that, I'd like to discuss about the implication jeanne_alter -> ruler_(fate/grand_order). Should it persist or be de-implicated, keeping Jeanne Alter as one character?

Also, there might be other servants as Rulers in future updates of the game so I don't see the need for the tag ruler_(fate/grand_order).

We'll probably need a jeanne alter -> ruler (fate/apocrypha) implication instead (or even a switch from jeanne alter to jeanne alter (fate/grand order)), since they're the same character but belong to different classes.

I heard somewhere that Jeanne Alter was datamined to be a ruler, so we can hold off having the ruler_(fate/grand_order) tag being deleted.

zaregoto said:

I heard somewhere that Jeanne Alter was datamined to be a ruler, so we can hold off having the ruler_(fate/grand_order) tag being deleted.

Other servants were datamined with their respective classes too but the ones that debuted in Fate/GO keep their actual names instead of class names in tagging to avoid confusion. That justifies the absence of tags like saber_(fate/grand_order) or lancer_(fate/grand_order).

dean_exia said:

Other servants were datamined with their respective classes too but the ones that debuted in Fate/GO keep their actual names instead of class names in tagging to avoid confusion. That justifies the absence of tags like saber_(fate/grand_order) or lancer_(fate/grand_order).

True, but then how would we name her when she appears. Brackets are reserved for artists and copyrights (at least that's what I believe) so we can't name her jeanne_alter_(ruler). jeanne_alter_ruler? ruler_(jeanne_alter)?

Brackets are also used for character variations that are animals, such as Reiuji Utsuho (Bird)

fossilnix said:

Brackets are also used for character variations that are animals, such as Reiuji Utsuho (Bird)

I see. Well, I'm reluctant for fate since there's lancer and cu_chulainn_(fate/grand_order) essentially the same person but different class, not in the format of cu_chulainn_(lancer) and cu_chulainn_(caster). But generally I'll go with the final verdict.

On another note, lancer_of_black is a lancer in fate/apocrypha but summoned as a berserker in fate/grand order. He is tagged as the previous for his appearance in pictures, but he isn't that anymore. I'm just bringing it up because the first time I learned about him and tried to look for him was searching for him as a berseker since I didn't know anything about the fate series. Perhaps a different tag for him for grand order?

zaregoto said:
On another note, lancer_of_black is a lancer in fate/apocrypha but summoned as a berserker in fate/grand order. He is tagged as the previous for his appearance in pictures, but he isn't that anymore. I'm just bringing it up because the first time I learned about him and tried to look for him was searching for him as a berseker since I didn't know anything about the fate series. Perhaps a different tag for him for grand order?

I'd go for his official designation in Fate/Apocrypha as per other servants that debuted in their own works besides Fate/GO. I don't think a different tag is needed because he's visually same in both appearances, unlike Santa Alter which is Saber Alter (another established servant) with some differences in design.

create implication heroine_z -> heroine_x

Link to request

Heroine Z is just a white-clothed version of Heroine X. Heroine X already implies Saber, so Heroine Z doesn't need it.

create implication saber_bride -> saber_extra

Link to request

Same person with different outfit.

The bulk update request #656 has been approved.

The bulk update request #671 has been approved.

create implication jeanne_alter -> ruler_(fate/apocrypha)

Link to request

saber alter implies saber.

create implication elizabeth_bathory_(fate/grand_order) -> lancer_(fate/extra_ccc)

Link to request

Although the same person, she was summoned as a different class and with a different outfit, which is the same situation as lancer from fate/stay night being summoned as a caster in grand order and given his own tag.

The bulk update request #701 has been approved.

The bulk update request #700 has been approved.

create implication ruler_(fate/grand_order) -> ruler_(fate/apocrypha)

Link to request

Same character.

Why not the other way round? Fate/Grand Order has more posts here that Fate/Apokrypha..