[bulk] Cat keyhole Bra

@Schrobby: For parodies of the outfit like different...

2016-02-13T07:30:19-05:00

For parodies of the outfit like different animals cat_lingerie adapted_costume is the way to go.
To tag other cutouts and animal bands animal_cutout and animal_band_panties should do just fine. I don't think we need extra tags for just one or two instances of a certain animal.

@EB: I think there needs to be some consistency in...

2016-02-13T04:00:37-05:00

I think there needs to be some consistency in tagging variants with different animal designs. I'm seeing multiple issues with them.

One thing I see is that the base cat_lingerie tag has been removed in some instances and replaced with (animal)_lingerie. I don't like it because the latter tags are superfluous (the (animal)_cutout tags are more worthwhile IMO as they could potentially be used for costumes not directly adapted from the cat lingerie), and it also removes them from a cat_lingerie adapted_costume search.

It seems taggers have settled on the (animal)_ear_panties form, but I would rather them be (animal)_band_panties as it won't always be ears sticking up. There may be horns (post #2257148), eyes (post #2258834), or a tail (post #2259393). Though instead of having a separate (animal)_band_panties tag for each animal, maybe there should just be (animal)_band that can be used in combination with the item. For instance, bunny_band animal_band_legwear would turn up post #1990615, while bunny_band animal_band_panties would turn up post #2257851. I already started cat_band since I needed a way to tag it when it was attached to neither panties nor legwear (a bikini top and a shoe strap so far).

@keonas: What did you do? cat_keyhole_bra is now at...

2016-02-02T18:42:47-05:00

What did you do?

cat_keyhole_bra is now at "-28" posts.

@albert: The bulk update request #549 has been approved.

2016-02-02T18:31:03-05:00

The bulk update request #549 has been approved.

@albert: The tag alias cat_keyhole_bra -> cat_lingerie...

2016-02-02T18:31:03-05:00

The tag alias cat_keyhole_bra -> cat_lingerie has conflicting wiki pages. cat_lingerie should be updated to include information from cat_keyhole_bra if necessary.

@EB: > Provence said: > > Speaking of cat ear...

2016-01-31T19:53:18-05:00

Provence said:

Speaking of cat ear panties...shouldn't they also imply cat lingerie?

No, they should not, because they could be paired with a top unrelated to the usual cat lingerie one.

@user_460797: > iridescent_slime said: > > It's called cat...

2016-01-31T19:24:09-05:00

iridescent_slime said:

It's called cat ear panties. I'm assuming that the other tag is a typo.

In any case: It's updated :).

@iridescent_slime: > CodeKyuubi said: > > Speaking of the panty...

2016-01-31T19:19:22-05:00

CodeKyuubi said:

Speaking of the panty set, why is it called cat_cat_ear_panties?

It's called cat ear panties. I'm assuming that the other tag is a typo.

@user_460797: Don't know. Seems pretty out of place in my...

2016-01-31T19:13:01-05:00

Don't know. Seems pretty out of place in my opinion.
Speaking of cat ear panties...shouldn't they also imply cat lingerie?

@CodeKyuubi: Speaking of the panty set, why is it called...

2016-01-31T19:10:48-05:00

Speaking of the panty set, why is it called cat_cat_ear_panties?

@EB: Already mentioned my support earlier, but...

2016-01-31T18:10:03-05:00

Already mentioned my support earlier, but making this an official +1.

@iridescent_slime: +1 to this alias. This is one of those cases...

2016-01-31T10:47:11-05:00

+1 to this alias. This is one of those cases where I think overly specific tags hamper our efforts to make the site more searchable. Condensing cat keyhole bra along with garments of the same style (cat keyhole panties?) into a single tag means there are fewer tags that must be added in order for someone to find what they're looking for.

@BrokenEagle98: +1 for the alias. There needs to be only one...

2016-01-31T09:26:41-05:00

+1 for the alias. There needs to be only one tag to describe the outfit, and the bra and/or panties tags and their associated color tags can further clarify how much of the cat lingerie is visible and what it looks like.

@NWF_Renim: create alias cat_keyhole_bra -> cat_lingerie ...

2016-01-31T02:05:07-05:00

create alias cat_keyhole_bra -> cat_lingerie

Link to request

@albert: The bulk update request #536 has been rejected.

2016-01-31T01:15:11-05:00

The bulk update request #536 has been rejected.

@worldendDominator: On a related note, and I think it was mentioned...

2016-01-30T03:17:19-05:00

On a related note, and I think it was mentioned earlier here, should we make a tag for cat-eared thighhighs like in post #2260056? I've seen them way before cat lingeries became a thing, mostly in sayori's artwork.

Edit: nevermind, didn't read attentively enough.

@user_460797: > NWF_Renim said: > > The cat_keyhole_bra tag...

2016-01-29T17:45:23-05:00

NWF_Renim said:

The cat_keyhole_bra tag is redundant now and the goal here was to rename the tag to match better the site's terminology and what was being tagged.

What is depicted in the image easily falls under the broader cat_lingerie tag (the replacement for cat_keyhole_bra), which would include both the top and bottom of the outfit. The bottom of the outfit is clearly a part of the cat lingerie set and the top part from the rear does match with what is a part of the set as well, so even without knowing if the cutout is there, there is enough information present to give it the cat_lingerie tag.

Good.
I seems I was just a step behind then. So everything is fine.
I guess the bulk update is not neccessary too.

@NWF_Renim: > Provence said: > > post #1812671 > Look...

2016-01-29T17:40:32-05:00

Provence said:

post #1812671
Look exactly like the cat_keyhole_bra (same frills and apparance except the cutout). So I don't think this will state a problem. If the cutou is not visible it just isn't a keyhole bra.

The cat_keyhole_bra tag is redundant now and the goal here was to rename the tag to match better the site's terminology and what was being tagged.

What is depicted in the image easily falls under the broader cat_lingerie tag (the replacement for cat_keyhole_bra), which would include both the top and bottom of the outfit. The bottom of the outfit is clearly a part of the cat lingerie set and the top part from the rear does match with what is a part of the set as well, so even without knowing if the cutout is there, there is enough information present to give it the cat_lingerie tag.

side note: Can we proceed to either alias or mass update cat_keyhole_bra to cat_lingerie?

@user_460797: > NWF_Renim said: > > The cat_lingerie tag...

2016-01-29T17:28:08-05:00

NWF_Renim said:

The cat_lingerie tag still applies given that what is there still matches up with the outfit, such as the presence of the paw print on the back of the bottom and the paw ends for the strings. The design of the top also matches, even if we can't see the cat cutout in the front.

Example for front and back appearances: post #2256801.

post #1812671
Look exactly like the cat_keyhole_bra (same frills and apparance except the cutout). So I don't think this will state a problem. If the cutou is not visible it just isn't a keyhole bra.

@Schrobby: > Provence said: > > @Schrobby Hmm, yes, but...

2016-01-29T14:07:35-05:00

Provence said:

@Schrobby Hmm, yes, but isn't it more like the cat's face? Because we can see the ears, mouth, whiskers.

True, but save the whiskers everything is part of the the cutout, and that is already tagged. I think that's sufficient and the whiskers don't warrant additional tagging. We do have a tag that might apply, whisker_markings, but using it here would flood that tag.