Posted under Tags
Cat_lingerie now has a wiki entry. Cat_band_legwear was tagged where it applies.
I guess together with cat_cutout that makes cat_keyhole_bra redundant.
What to do with post #2258534 and post #2257277? I think these look too different to be just a parody of the outfit.
Schrobby said:
Cat_lingerie now has a wiki entry. Cat_band_legwear was tagged where it applies.
I guess together with cat_cutout that makes cat_keyhole_bra redundant.What to do with post #2258534 and post #2257277? I think these look too different to be just a parody of the outfit.
How about cat_print?
Provence said:
How about cat_print?
It's just the whiskers that are printed. If we tag that finding real cat prints like post #2204506 would be difficult.
Schrobby said:
It's just the whiskers that are printed. If we tag that finding real cat prints like post #2204506 would be difficult.
We could have something like a whisker print tag, but that might be too specific to be of value. I'm not sure that is something anyone would bother searching for.
post #2259384 looks like the cat keyhole outfit, but the character is turned away so the cutout isn't visible. Do any of the tags still apply?
fossilnix said:
post #2259384 looks like the cat keyhole outfit, but the character is turned away so the cutout isn't visible. Do any of the tags still apply?
If it isn't visible it isn't one.
I'd tag it as white_bra or something lika that.
@Schrobby Hmm, yes, but isn't it more like the cat's face? Because we can see the ears, mouth, whiskers.
fossilnix said:
post #2259384 looks like the cat keyhole outfit, but the character is turned away so the cutout isn't visible. Do any of the tags still apply?
The cat_lingerie tag still applies given that what is there still matches up with the outfit, such as the presence of the paw print on the back of the bottom and the paw ends for the strings. The design of the top also matches, even if we can't see the cat cutout in the front.
Example for front and back appearances: post #2256801.
fossilnix said:
post #2259384 looks like the cat keyhole outfit, but the character is turned away so the cutout isn't visible. Do any of the tags still apply?
Cat_lingerie yes, cat_cutout no.
Provence said:
@Schrobby Hmm, yes, but isn't it more like the cat's face? Because we can see the ears, mouth, whiskers.
True, but save the whiskers everything is part of the the cutout, and that is already tagged. I think that's sufficient and the whiskers don't warrant additional tagging. We do have a tag that might apply, whisker_markings, but using it here would flood that tag.
NWF_Renim said:
The cat_lingerie tag still applies given that what is there still matches up with the outfit, such as the presence of the paw print on the back of the bottom and the paw ends for the strings. The design of the top also matches, even if we can't see the cat cutout in the front.
Example for front and back appearances: post #2256801.
post #1812671
Look exactly like the cat_keyhole_bra (same frills and apparance except the cutout). So I don't think this will state a problem. If the cutou is not visible it just isn't a keyhole bra.
Provence said:
post #1812671
Look exactly like the cat_keyhole_bra (same frills and apparance except the cutout). So I don't think this will state a problem. If the cutou is not visible it just isn't a keyhole bra.
The cat_keyhole_bra tag is redundant now and the goal here was to rename the tag to match better the site's terminology and what was being tagged.
What is depicted in the image easily falls under the broader cat_lingerie tag (the replacement for cat_keyhole_bra), which would include both the top and bottom of the outfit. The bottom of the outfit is clearly a part of the cat lingerie set and the top part from the rear does match with what is a part of the set as well, so even without knowing if the cutout is there, there is enough information present to give it the cat_lingerie tag.
side note: Can we proceed to either alias or mass update cat_keyhole_bra to cat_lingerie?
NWF_Renim said:
The cat_keyhole_bra tag is redundant now and the goal here was to rename the tag to match better the site's terminology and what was being tagged.
What is depicted in the image easily falls under the broader cat_lingerie tag (the replacement for cat_keyhole_bra), which would include both the top and bottom of the outfit. The bottom of the outfit is clearly a part of the cat lingerie set and the top part from the rear does match with what is a part of the set as well, so even without knowing if the cutout is there, there is enough information present to give it the cat_lingerie tag.
Good.
I seems I was just a step behind then. So everything is fine.
I guess the bulk update is not neccessary too.
On a related note, and I think it was mentioned earlier here, should we make a tag for cat-eared thighhighs like in post #2260056? I've seen them way before cat lingeries became a thing, mostly in sayori's artwork.
Edit: nevermind, didn't read attentively enough.
The bulk update request #536 has been rejected.
create alias cat_keyhole_bra -> cat_lingerie
+1 for the alias. There needs to be only one tag to describe the outfit, and the bra and/or panties tags and their associated color tags can further clarify how much of the cat lingerie is visible and what it looks like.
+1 to this alias. This is one of those cases where I think overly specific tags hamper our efforts to make the site more searchable. Condensing cat keyhole bra along with garments of the same style (cat keyhole panties?) into a single tag means there are fewer tags that must be added in order for someone to find what they're looking for.
Already mentioned my support earlier, but making this an official +1.
Speaking of the panty set, why is it called cat_cat_ear_panties?
Don't know. Seems pretty out of place in my opinion.
Speaking of cat ear panties...shouldn't they also imply cat lingerie?
