tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/13960Clearer definition of "so_moe_i'm_gonna_die!" tag2017-05-08T03:33:03-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1309792017-05-08T03:33:03-04:002017-05-08T03:33:03-04:00@Mikaeri: Hmm, well doesn't that sound like the kind of...<p>Hmm, well doesn't that sound like the kind of thing a pool is for? Or do you mean something more specific?</p>Mikaeri/users/470449tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1309782017-05-08T03:29:59-04:002017-05-08T03:31:27-04:00@EB: So what should the tag be for a reaction to...<p>So what should the tag be for a reaction to cuteness that's not fatal? That theme should definitely still be searchable regardless.</p>EB/users/11672tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1309752017-05-08T02:09:29-04:002017-05-08T02:09:29-04:00@bakaneka: I was one of the users who was confused by that...<p>I was one of the users who was confused by that tag description, so I edited the wiki to add some examples of what not to tag. Feel free to fix it if there are issues with my edit.</p>bakaneka/users/220474tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1299702017-04-20T09:09:49-04:002017-04-20T09:09:49-04:00@Jarlath: The definition in the wiki already says it...<p>The definition in the wiki already says it needs visible damage like nosebleeds or an apparent heart attack to qualify... so I don't see a need to add extra bits to the wiki. Just removing the posts which don't qualify should be enough. </p>Jarlath/users/56947tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1299682017-04-20T08:16:30-04:002017-04-20T08:16:30-04:00@user_509825: > Mikaeri said:
>
> Hmm, I think it's pretty...<blockquote>
<p>Mikaeri said:</p>
<p>Hmm, I think it's pretty clear already though. Looks like just mistagging to me.</p>
</blockquote><p>Same here.<br>If it continues, then a DMail can be sent to those users. If they still continue, then a mod/admin should look into the case. </p>user_509825/users/509825tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1299612017-04-20T02:47:34-04:002017-04-20T02:47:34-04:00@Mikaeri: Hmm, I think it's pretty clear already though....<p>Hmm, I think it's pretty clear already though. Looks like just mistagging to me.</p>Mikaeri/users/470449tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1299462017-04-19T23:29:46-04:002017-04-19T23:32:39-04:00@l0l1n470r: The so_moe_i'm_gonna_die! tag might need a...<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/posts?tags=so_moe_i%27m_gonna_die%21">so_moe_i'm_gonna_die!</a> tag might need a clearer definition and a bit of cleanup. It seems to me that some are adding the tag despite there being no indication of "<strong>severe</strong> mental shock, injury (or even death)" in the pictures: see <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2636079">post #2636079</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2661844">post #2661844</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2670231">post #2670231</a>.</p><p>Perhaps a condition could be added that there is some form of detrimental damage actually shown? Like moe doing actual damage, rather than simply character reactions to cute stuff, which I believe is not what the tag is about. I believe the point of the tag is an overreaction to moe, where one can even <a class="dtext-link" href="/posts/2621447">get hurt</a> or <a class="dtext-link" href="/posts/2614927">die</a>. Basically, it's so cute that it actually hurts.</p>l0l1n470r/users/499575