tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/14847 Print kimono 2018-01-01T00:34:43-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141233 2018-01-01T00:34:43-05:00 2018-01-01T00:34:43-05:00 @Unbreakable: > ☆♪ said: > > plain_kimono maybe? > > I'm... <blockquote> <p>☆♪ said:</p> <p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/plain_kimono" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">plain_kimono</a> maybe?</p> <p>I'm worried it wouldn't be used, though...</p> </blockquote><p>Yeah, it sounds a bit plain...</p><p>With that joke out of the way, I came up with some names myself but they were either as bad as Provence's suggestions or worse. I'm still for changing this around though and making non-printed kimonos the tagged ones.</p> Unbreakable /users/430030 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141232 2017-12-31T23:24:47-05:00 2017-12-31T23:24:47-05:00 @☆♪: > Provence said: > > I haven't figured out a... <blockquote> <p>Provence said:</p> <p>I haven't figured out a good name, though. Something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/unprinted_kimono" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">unprinted kimono</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/solid_color_kimono" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">solid_color_kimono</a> sounds extremely weird, though.</p> </blockquote><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/plain_kimono" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">plain_kimono</a> maybe?</p><p>I'm worried it wouldn't be used, though...</p> ☆♪ /users/439690 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141229 2017-12-31T22:34:10-05:00 2017-12-31T22:34:10-05:00 @user_525419: Hello. Currently, this tag is defined with the... <p>Hello.<br>Currently, this tag is defined with the following:</p><blockquote><p>A kimono that has any type of stylized printings on it such as flowers, hearts, animals, and such. This includes other kimono-styled tops such as yukatas and furisodes.</p></blockquote><p>In my opinion, this doesn't make much sense. This work with other clothing like skirt, dresses, shirts that are most of the time solid colored:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/white_shirt">white_shirt</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/red_skirt">red_skirt</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/white_dress">white_dress</a> etc. </p><p>But for kimonos, this doesn't seem to fit. We are tagging the exception, but most kimonos do have a pattern or a print (mostly a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/floral_print">floral_print</a>).<br>That means I suggest to nuke this tag and create instead a tag that describes an unprinted kimono/yukata so it includes only the solid color one. </p><p>I haven't figured out a good name, though. Something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/unprinted_kimono" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">unprinted kimono</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/solid_color_kimono" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">solid_color_kimono</a> sounds extremely weird, though. </p> user_525419 /users/525419