tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/14889 Renaming basic human features tags 2018-02-02T04:14:34-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142665 2018-02-02T04:14:34-05:00 2018-02-02T06:54:16-05:00 @nonamethanks: Seems the change is upon us (issue #3529) so we... <p>Seems the change is upon us (<a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-github-id-link" href="https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru/issues/3529">issue #3529</a>) so we need to sort these tags out pretty soon. I think I'll start going through some of them in the next couple of days. I'll start with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ears">ears</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ear_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ear focus</a>, so anyone else feel free to handle another one in the meanwhile.</p><p>I think handling them manually and gradually moving the posts to the new tags while at the same time simply detagging those who don't fit is a better approach than a mass update or an alias, because otherwise we'd simply end up having the noise move from one tag to the other. It'll also work better in the long term because it's easier to have a saved search with all of these generic tag and monitor it every once in a while than have clueless users dump irrelevant posts into the new tags because of autocompletion.</p><p>Before I start going through them however I'd like an admin's opinion on it, since it's a pretty serious change given the size of some of these tags.</p><p><a href="/users?name=Hillside_Moose">@Hillside_Moose</a> <a href="/users?name=NWF_Renim">@NWF_Renim</a> <a href="/users?name=Type-kun">@Type-kun</a> opinions? Also please consider approving <a class="dtext-link" href="/forum_topics/7900#forum_post_141877">this alias from pov_ass to ass_focus</a> since it's one of the tags in question. This one is the exception to not aliasing because <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/pov_ass" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">pov ass</a> is already used exactly like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ass_focus">ass focus</a> would be.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142047 2018-01-15T15:22:41-05:00 2018-01-15T15:27:09-05:00 @user_441999: If the eyebrows one is done then... <p>If the eyebrows one is done then "prominent_eyebrows" would be better than "eyebrow_focus" as that's a better description of what the tag is for. Images that focus on eyebrows are basically non-existant. I got rid of about a fifth of that tag's uses after the implications were removed, incidentally, although there were probably twice as many left that would have wanted removal. With the implications gone and various other tag gardening in the time since then I do think there are more images with the tag that want to keep it than those that don't by this point, so I'd rather have it transitioned over and then gardened to size rather than nuked and rebuilt from scratch.</p><p>Perhaps prominent_x would be better for some of the others than x_focus.</p><p>The only problem is that it puts the body part at the end, so people don't find it when searching. x_prominent would work, I suppose.</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142029 2018-01-15T06:01:17-05:00 2018-01-15T06:01:17-05:00 @user_525419: The "focus" part is good. It delivers the user... <p>The "focus" part is good. It delivers the user in its name already how the tag should be used. </p> user_525419 /users/525419 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142009 2018-01-15T00:03:05-05:00 2018-01-15T00:03:22-05:00 @chilled_sake: > nonamethanks said: > > Another one I just... <blockquote> <p>nonamethanks said:</p> <p>Another one I just came upon: <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/eyebrows">eyebrows</a>. Not sure if we even need it as it's currently phrased because we have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thick_eyebrows">thick eyebrows</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/short_eyebrows">short eyebrows</a> already.</p> </blockquote><p>I managed to remove the implications in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/13025">topic #13025</a>. The tag is completely useless from years of having bad implications.</p><p>It could be nuked and a new eyebrow_focus tag cultivated in it's place.</p><p>+1 except that I don't like the "focus" part of it. I don't have a suitable alternative word however. The concept works out so we can at least get this through and if someone comes up with a more descriptive name we can use that.</p> chilled_sake /users/463832 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142000 2018-01-14T22:05:17-05:00 2018-01-14T22:05:17-05:00 @nonamethanks: Another one I just came upon: eyebrows. Not... <p>Another one I just came upon: <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/eyebrows">eyebrows</a>. Not sure if we even need it as it's currently phrased because we have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thick_eyebrows">thick eyebrows</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/short_eyebrows">short eyebrows</a> already.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141930 2018-01-13T00:43:54-05:00 2018-01-13T00:43:54-05:00 @evazion: +1, with a couple caveats: * Nose is generally... <p>+1, with a couple caveats:</p><ul><li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nose">Nose</a> is generally used when a character is drawn with a well-defined nose, as opposed to the usual anime-style <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dot_nose">dot nose</a>. It's usually used to indicate things drawn in a more realistic / Western style, not necessarily for when the nose is a point of focus.</li></ul><ul><li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pov_feet">pov feet</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/foot_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">foot focus</a> instead of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet">feet</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/foot_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">foot focus</a>, as nonamethanks mentioned.</li></ul> evazion /users/52664 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141892 2018-01-12T12:07:09-05:00 2018-01-12T12:07:09-05:00 @nonamethanks: Thighs and hips I think have more of a fetish... <p>Thighs and hips I think have more of a fetish connotation in this case, so I'd be for leaving them as they are right now. To be more clear, I can see someone searching for thighs or hips just because they want to see pics containing them, but I can't really see someone searching for eyes just because they want to see every picture on danbooru containing eyes.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141891 2018-01-12T11:40:36-05:00 2018-01-12T11:40:36-05:00 @user_525419: > kittey said: > > Not sure what thighs is... <blockquote> <p>kittey said:</p> <p>Not sure what <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thighs">thighs</a> is actually for. The wiki doesn’t mention a particular focus on it.</p> <p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/hips" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hips</a> tag seems completely useless.</p> </blockquote><p>I use it when you can still see the thighs, for example in a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/cowboy_shot">cowboy shot</a> like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2969925">post #2969925</a>. </p> user_525419 /users/525419 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141889 2018-01-12T11:09:53-05:00 2018-01-12T11:09:53-05:00 @kittey: > Kayako said: > > For this, something like... <blockquote> <p>Kayako said:</p> <p>For this, something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/misplaced_mouth" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">misplaced mouth</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/misplaced_eyes" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">misplaced eyes</a> would probably a more concise wording.</p> </blockquote><p>“misplaced” sounds like accidental placement, though.</p> kittey /users/320377 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141887 2018-01-12T11:07:08-05:00 2018-01-12T11:07:08-05:00 @Kayako: > nonamethanks said: > > Also for mouth and... <blockquote> <p>nonamethanks said:</p> <p>Also for mouth and eyes we already have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/extra_eyes">extra eyes</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/extra_mouth">extra mouth</a>. Maybe we need a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/mouth_in_unusual_place" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">mouth in unusual place</a> too, and eye equivalent, to help differentiate and make the concept more easily searchable?</p> </blockquote><p>For this, something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/misplaced_mouth" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">misplaced mouth</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/misplaced_eyes" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">misplaced eyes</a> would probably a more concise wording.</p> Kayako /users/44748 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141885 2018-01-12T10:17:56-05:00 2018-01-12T10:17:56-05:00 @kittey: > Provence said: > > What about thighs and... <blockquote> <p>Provence said:</p> <p>What about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thighs">thighs</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/hips" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hips</a>?</p> </blockquote><p>Not sure what <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thighs">thighs</a> is actually for. The wiki doesn’t mention a particular focus on it.</p><p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/hips" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hips</a> tag seems completely useless.</p> kittey /users/320377 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141882 2018-01-12T09:28:12-05:00 2018-01-12T09:28:12-05:00 @user_525419: What about thighs and hips? <p>What about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thighs">thighs</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/hips" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hips</a>? </p> user_525419 /users/525419 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141880 2018-01-12T09:11:30-05:00 2018-01-12T09:11:30-05:00 @nonamethanks: A strong +1 for this. Also, I'd still suggest... <p>A strong +1 for this. Also, I'd still suggest pov_feet to be moved to foot_focus, as that's the current usage of that tag. Perhaps an alias in that case? Or just making that tag a disambiguation do not use, to (point to and) split into pov_legs (for when the viewer's legs are visible) and the mentioned foot_focus, which seems the vast majority of it.</p><p>Should <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">legs</a> be renamed to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/legs_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">legs focus</a> to keep consistency? </p><p>Also for mouth and eyes we already have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/extra_eyes">extra eyes</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/extra_mouth">extra mouth</a>. Maybe we need a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/mouth_in_unusual_place" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">mouth in unusual place</a> too, and eye equivalent, to help differentiate and make the concept more easily searchable?</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141879 2018-01-12T08:52:19-05:00 2018-01-12T09:19:31-05:00 @kittey: nonamethanks brought up something in forum... <p>nonamethanks brought up something in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/141842">forum #141842</a> that has been an issue for quite a while and that is the incorrect use of basic human feature tags like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nose">nose</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ears">ears</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fingers">fingers</a>. There are more of those, of course.</p><p>These tags are supposed to be used only when they are the focus of an image because tagging them on every post with humans (or other creatures) would make them completely useless. Yet they are constantly misused, usually by inexperienced taggers who follow the “tag what you see” maxim.</p><p>These should all be renamed to *_focus (like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/nose_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">nose_focus</a>) and the original tags should be made do-no-use tags. That will make them more intuitive, curb misuse and they’re easier to clean, too. They would go well with tags like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/male_focus">male_focus</a> (and the ridiculous but extremely fitting <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tank_focus" title="This wiki page does not exist">tank_focus</a>). Bonus: I won’t be possible to use these generic tags as padding if we implement some kind of “Most Valuable Tagger/Updater/User”.</p><p>Incomplete list of relevant tags:</p><ul> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nose">nose</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/nose_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">nose_focus</a> </li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ears">ears</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ear_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ear_focus</a> </li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fingers">fingers</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/finger_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">finger_focus</a> </li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mouth">mouth</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/mouth_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">mouth_focus</a>†</li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/eyes">eyes</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/eye_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">eye_focus</a>† and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/extra_eyes">extra_eyes</a> </li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hands">hands</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/hand_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hand_focus</a> </li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet">feet</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/foot_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">foot_focus</a> (apparently not the same as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pov_feet">pov_feet</a>)</li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/hair" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hair</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/detached_hair">detached_hair</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/14649">topic #14649</a>); I don’t think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/hair_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hair_focus</a> is necessary.</li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/pov_ass" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">pov_ass</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ass_focus">ass_focus</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/7900">topic #7900</a>)</li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">legs</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/leg_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">leg_focus</a> </li> </ul><p>What else is missing from this list?</p><p>† <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mouth">mouth</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/eyes">eyes</a> are a bit weird because they’re used for different things: focus and unusual placement (and amount). That should be split up anyway, IMO.</p><p>Edit: Added tags mentioned by nonamethanks.</p> kittey /users/320377