[APPROVED] Tag implication: skin_fang -> fang

@evazion: I created mouth drool at around the same time...

2019-07-01T14:57:21-04:00

I created mouth drool at around the same time as skin fangs because it's a similar trope that we didn't have a tag for. There are cases like post #3423096 where it's a very noticeable part of the image. Drooling is a large tag and it's hard to find this particular trope within it.

@Unbreakable: > iridescent_slime said: > > Whoa, when did...

2019-06-30T23:50:13-04:00

iridescent_slime said:

Whoa, when did this happen? AFAIK we've always just tagged this as drooling. The drooling wiki still acknowledges "an indent in the lower lipline" as one of the intended uses of this tag.

I think the main reason it was made is because saliva wiki says it shouldn't be used for those posts, the tag was made by evazion on the 30:th of March this year if that's what you wanted to know. It's also a quite common thing in anime/manga.

@iridescent_slime: > Unbreakable said: > > Are you talking about...

2019-06-30T23:17:38-04:00

Unbreakable said:

Are you talking about mouth drool?

Whoa, when did this happen? AFAIK we've always just tagged this as drooling. The drooling wiki still acknowledges "an indent in the lower lipline" as one of the intended uses of this tag.

@Unbreakable: > 忍猫 said: > > Will there be a similar tag...

2019-06-30T22:38:32-04:00

忍猫 said:

Will there be a similar tag involving the drool "indent" usually seen on chibi characters? The last time it was brought up was about two years ago in forum #132885.

Are you talking about mouth drool?

@user_429955: Will there be a similar tag involving the drool...

2019-06-30T22:36:36-04:00

Will there be a similar tag involving the drool "indent" usually seen on chibi characters? The last time it was brought up was about two years ago in forum #132885.

@NWF_Renim: I've migrated 3 posts from skin_fang to...

2019-04-27T17:50:18-04:00

I've migrated 3 posts from skin_fang to skin_fangs, cleaned up a few posts that were marked with fangs when it should have just been fang, and I'll leave post #3470932 to someone else to figure out where it would be best to put it.

@DanbooruBot: The tag implication skin_fang -> fang (forum...

2019-04-27T17:48:24-04:00

The tag implication skin_fang -> fang (forum #155989) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

@evazion: See topic #16062. Fang out has the same problem...

2019-04-10T02:26:24-04:00

See topic #16062. Fang out has the same problem of being used for both fang and fangs, which eventually led to fangs out being created to deal with that issue.

Having separate tags for both skin fang and skin fangs isn't great, I admit, but I think not implying fang or fangs is worse. I expect the number of skin fangs posts to be very small, and I think not implying skin fang -> fang will eventually lead to mistagging that will be difficult to correct.

@741qwe852asd963zxc: > evazion said: > > Tag it skin fangs. That's...

2019-04-10T01:33:07-04:00

evazion said:

Tag it skin fangs. That's how we handle fang out versus fangs out.

what?

@evazion: Tag it skin fangs. That's how we handle fang...

2019-04-09T17:27:48-04:00

Tag it skin fangs. That's how we handle fang out versus fangs out.

@worldendDominator: What about skin_fang+fangs?

2019-04-09T17:18:04-04:00

What about skin_fang+fangs?

@nanami: [ti:9177] Reason: Self-explanatory...

2019-04-06T11:49:26-04:00

The tag implication #9177 skin_fang -> fang has been approved.

Reason: Self-explanatory (hopefully).

EDIT: The tag implication skin_fang -> fang (forum #155989) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.