tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/16463[REJECTED] Dress lift etc. implication to clothes_lift2020-01-28T19:03:03-05:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1626302020-01-28T19:03:02-05:002020-01-28T19:03:02-05:00@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #2186 (forum #161269)...<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=2186">bulk update request #2186</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/161269">forum #161269</a>) has been rejected by <a href="/users?name=DanbooruBot">@DanbooruBot</a>.</p>DanbooruBot/users/502584tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1626292020-01-28T19:03:02-05:002020-01-28T19:03:02-05:00@DanbooruBot: This bulk update request has been rejected...<p>This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.</p>DanbooruBot/users/502584tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1625172020-01-24T13:01:41-05:002020-01-24T13:01:41-05:00@skylightcrystal: > Lacrimosa said:
>
> Why is it that such...<blockquote>
<p>Lacrimosa said:</p>
<p>Why is it that such distinction are never helpful?<br>You're making things complicated by trying to add a completely new tag.</p>
<p>Why not just stay with what there is at this point in time?</p>
</blockquote><p>Ask evazion. I was just saying I have no objection to it, partly because as evazion said they're much the same action, and partly in contrast to the other two things.</p>skylightcrystal/users/557539tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1625142020-01-24T04:37:55-05:002020-01-24T04:37:55-05:00@Provence: > skylightcrystal said:
>
> I really don't...<blockquote>
<p>skylightcrystal said:</p>
<p>I really don't like the idea of combining skirt lifts and upper body clothing lifts</p>
<p>As for dress lift vs skirt lift... well, there are some cases where dresses are lifted all the way up, thus exposing the upper body as well (eg. <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3755655">post #3755655</a>) which can't be done with a skirt, so they're not really the same either.</p>
<p>I have no objection to making a "top lift" to replace shirt/sweater/tank top/vest/camisole lift, though.</p>
</blockquote><p>Why is it that such distinction are never helpful?<br>You're making things complicated by trying to add a completely new tag.</p><p>Why not just stay with what there is at this point in time? </p>Provence/users/570925tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1625122020-01-24T02:45:46-05:002020-01-24T02:46:13-05:00@skylightcrystal: I really don't like the idea of combining skirt...<p>I really don't like the idea of combining skirt lifts and upper body clothing lifts</p><p>As for dress lift vs skirt lift... well, there are some cases where dresses are lifted all the way up, thus exposing the upper body as well (eg. <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3755655">post #3755655</a>) which can't be done with a skirt, so they're not really the same either.</p><p>I have no objection to making a "top lift" to replace shirt/sweater/tank top/vest/camisole lift, though.</p>skylightcrystal/users/557539tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1625102020-01-23T23:49:24-05:002020-01-23T23:49:24-05:00@iridescent_slime: > evazion said:
>
> Skirt lift and dress lift...<blockquote>
<p>evazion said:</p>
<p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">Skirt lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dress_lift">dress lift</a> are also the practically same thing.</p>
</blockquote><p>It's always seemed strange to me that these two tags are kept separate while <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/dress_hold" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">dress_hold</a> is aliased to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_hold">skirt_hold</a>.</p><blockquote><p>The other thing is that doing this means we should probably do the same for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothing_aside">clothing aside</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_pull">clothes pull</a>.</p></blockquote><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_tug" title="This wiki page does not exist">Clothes_tug</a> as well, presumably.</p><p>Doing this for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_pull">clothes_pull</a> has the same issue you mentioned with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shirt_lift">shirt_lift</a> versus <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">skirt_lift</a>. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shirt_pull">Shirt_pull</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pants_pull">pants_pull</a> are similar actions (pulling down a garment to reveal what's underneath) but with somewhat different effects.</p><p>If this is a problem, we could divide up the clothes_* tags into upper-body and lower-body clothing. Something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/top_lift" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">top_lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/top_pull" title="This wiki page does not exist">top_pull</a> for shirts, sweaters, and blouses, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">skirt_lift</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/bottom_lift" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bottom_lift</a> shouldn't be necessary as pants can't be flipped up like skirts) and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/bottom_pull" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bottom_pull</a> for skirts, pants, and shorts. This approach might be a bit too clunky, though.</p>iridescent_slime/users/438068tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1625082020-01-23T19:50:12-05:002020-01-23T19:50:53-05:00@evazion: I'm not necessarily against this, but it didn't...<p>I'm not necessarily against this, but it didn't receive any discussion. I do think it's annoying that we don't have an umbrella tag for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shirt_lift">shirt lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sweater_lift" title="This wiki page does not exist">sweater lift</a> when they're the exact same action, just with slightly different clothing. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">Skirt lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dress_lift">dress lift</a> are also the practically same thing.</p><p>One thing I'm not sure about is whether <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shirt_lift">shirt lift</a> / <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sweater_lift" title="This wiki page does not exist">sweater lift</a> should be grouped with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">skirt lift</a> / <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dress_lift">dress lift</a>. One is about exposing the breasts and the other is about exposing the crotch. The tags may have the same name, but the action isn't quite the same.</p><p>The other thing is that doing this means we should probably do the same for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothing_aside">clothing aside</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_pull">clothes pull</a>.</p>evazion/users/52664tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1625052020-01-23T19:26:00-05:002020-01-23T19:26:00-05:00@DanbooruBot: This bulk update request is pending automatic...<p>This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.</p>DanbooruBot/users/502584tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1612692019-11-29T06:48:05-05:002020-01-28T19:03:03-05:00@Provence: [bur:2186]
Reason: Couldn't really find a...<p>The bulk update request #2186 has been rejected.</p><p>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dress_lift">dress_lift</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_lift">clothes_lift</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">skirt_lift</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_lift">clothes_lift</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shirt_lift">shirt_lift</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_lift">clothes_lift</a></p><p>Reason: Couldn't really find a similar topic (but the search option isn't the best here), so here's an obvious request at first glance. The wiki page of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clothes_lift">clothes lift</a> also doesn't say anything against the implication and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sweater_lift" title="This wiki page does not exist">sweater lift</a> already implies the tag.</p><p>Just surprised this implication doesn't exist, yet. After over 10 years.</p><p>EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.</p><p>EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.</p><p>EDIT: The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=2186">bulk update request #2186</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/161269">forum #161269</a>) has been rejected by <a href="/users?name=DanbooruBot">@DanbooruBot</a>.</p>Provence/users/570925