[REJECTED] Tag implication: glowing_headgear

@evazion: Yes, 48 posts is too small for an implication...

2020-02-09T03:30:08-05:00

Yes, 48 posts is too small for an implication and headgear is such a broad and vague tag that I'm reluctant to imply anything to it.

@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #2194 (forum #161406)...

2020-02-04T19:23:23-05:00

The bulk update request #2194 (forum #161406) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

@DanbooruBot: This bulk update request has been rejected...

2020-02-04T19:23:23-05:00

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

@iridescent_slime: Considering that this tag has only ever been...

2020-01-30T20:02:06-05:00

Considering that this tag has only ever been used for one character, I think that manual tagging should be sufficient at this point. Maybe if it gains more traction in the future, these implications might become a bit more useful, but Kantai Collection's utter dominance of the headgear tag makes me regard this as unlikely.

@DanbooruBot: This bulk update request is pending automatic...

2020-01-30T19:24:08-05:00

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

@MarqFJA87: [bur:2194] Reason: 1. Does not implicate...

2019-12-05T20:48:13-05:00

The bulk update request #2194 has been rejected.

create implication glowing_headgear -> glowing
create implication glowing_headgear -> headgear

Reason: 1. Does not implicate either tag as of this writing.
2. The coincidence of glowing and headgear in a single post doesn't necessarily mean that the headgear in question is glowing; it could, for example, be due to the presence of glowing eyes alone.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2194 (forum #161406) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.