tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/16583 Tag Suggestion: Reverse Ryona 2020-02-18T14:42:39-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163233 2020-02-18T14:42:39-05:00 2020-02-18T14:42:39-05:00 @evazion: I think reverse ryona is fine. There's no need... <p>I think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/reverse_ryona">reverse ryona</a> is fine. There's no need to overthink this. Ryona is normally understood to be for female characters only, and reverse ryona is the most commonly recognized term outside Danbooru for ryona against males.</p><p>I don't think see a need to try to combine male and female ryona together, or put them under an umbrella tag. That's like trying to combine <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/yuri">yuri</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/yaoi">yaoi</a> together, or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/loli">loli</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shota">shota</a> together. Usually highly gendered fetishes are kept separate for a reason.</p> evazion /users/52664 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163073 2020-02-13T22:39:57-05:00 2020-02-13T22:41:07-05:00 @Zurreak: > iridescent_slime said: > > Wouldn't this... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Wouldn't this search fail to find any images where male characters are subjected to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> while female characters are present?</p> </blockquote><p>When their presence is more than just a hand or something, yes. Most of the ones I've found are unsuitable for male_focus. Given how lopsided the post count between male ryona and female ryona is, there's no way that someone who only likes seeing men in pain would wade through the entirety of the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> tag for the images that male_focus doesn't apply to.</p> Zurreak /users/484260 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163070 2020-02-13T19:42:22-05:00 2020-02-13T19:42:22-05:00 @iridescent_slime: > feline_lump said: > > Is there any reason... <blockquote> <p>feline_lump said:</p> <p>Is there any reason why <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/male_focus">male focus</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> wouldn't work, in the same vein as it does for most non-gendered fetishes?</p> </blockquote><p>Wouldn't this search fail to find any images where male characters are subjected to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> while female characters are present? My blacklist prevents me from finding examples but this seems like a pretty obvious reason why <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/male_focus">male_focus</a> isn't reliable in cases like this.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163067 2020-02-13T19:00:11-05:00 2020-02-13T19:28:44-05:00 @feline_lump: Is there any reason why male focus + ryona... <p>Is there any reason why <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/male_focus">male focus</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> wouldn't work, in the same vein as it does for most non-gendered fetishes?</p><p>Potential related discussion: <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/reverse_rape" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">reverse rape</a> was converted to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/femdom">femdom</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/rape">rape</a> as a result of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/1489">topic #1489</a>.</p> feline_lump /users/343288 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163050 2020-02-13T00:41:17-05:00 2020-02-13T00:41:17-05:00 @heartattack: In theory if some variation of... <p>In theory if some variation of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_%28female%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_(female)</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_on_female" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_on_female</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_%28male%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_(male)</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_on_male" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_on_male</a> got made as tags, they could still both implicate a more general <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> tag.</p> heartattack /users/612007 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163047 2020-02-12T18:22:01-05:00 2020-02-12T18:22:01-05:00 @Zurreak: That's a fair question. I should've explained a... <p>That's a fair question. I should've explained a bit more. The two "Other names" I mentioned before, 逆リョナ and 男リョナ, translate literally to "reverse ryona" and "male ryona" and they correspond on pixiv to exactly the tag that I'm proposing. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_%28female%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_(female)</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_%28male%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_(male)</a> would be perfectly clear way of expressing the meaning of the tags through their names. It's arguably better than my suggested naming scheme, but I'm not 100% sure about it. The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> tag already has 741 posts under it, so changing the tag's name would take a BUR. I would guess that it's on a considerable number of blacklists and I don't know how BUR's interact with that sort of thing.</p> Zurreak /users/484260 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163046 2020-02-12T16:59:52-05:00 2020-02-12T16:59:52-05:00 @kittey: I don’t know anything about ryona, so I’m... <p>I don’t know anything about ryona, so I’m wondering, is the target obvious to ryona fans if you use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/reverse_ryona">reverse_ryona</a> or would something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_%28female%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_(female)</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_%28male%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_(male)</a> be clearer? Or going by some of the futa tags, something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_on_female" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_on_female</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ryona_on_male" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ryona_on_male</a>?</p> kittey /users/320377 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/163037 2020-02-12T06:08:36-05:00 2020-02-12T06:08:36-05:00 @Zurreak: The ryona tag is currently defined as: "A... <p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> tag is currently defined as:<br>"A subset of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sadism">sadism</a>, mostly depicting women in extreme pain or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/bruising" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bruising</a>, with a particular focus on its sexualised depiction."<br>This definition allows for posts of men under the same conditions to be included under the tag. The "Other names" field confirms this, as 逆リョナ and 男リョナ are used exclusively when the aggrieved are male.</p><p>However, in practice, there are exactly 0 images with the ryona tag in which men are the subjects of the tag. I believe this is a good thing because most people who would be interested in seeing one gender in pain aren't interested in seeing the other in pain.</p><p>I have identified 29 posts which I believe qualify for the conditions of ryona featuring male subjects. I am proposing that the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ryona">ryona</a> tag be made explicitly gendered (as it already is in practice) and that a reverse_ryona tag be created for ryona featuring men.</p> Zurreak /users/484260