TOS states that breast sizes bigger than 2 heads violate the TOS. But two head for what? The both breasts entirely or one breast?

I don't think a post having gigantic_breasts is against the ToS itself

I think it's just that posts with gigantic_breasts have a higher tendency to be grotesque than other posts

so as long as it isn't grotesque it's alright

that was my interpretation of it, but let's wait until someone else says something about this

what would your definition of grotesque be then?

I think it would be risky to post images like post #614487

but images like post #481790, where the artist is emphasizing the contrast of the "big strong tough" one vs the "small little cute" one by adding volume to raijin's features (look at her hair) and making fujin's smaller I see no problem with

The whole grotesque and ToS violation thing was discussed back in forum #28997, and it's not what this thread is about.

Action_Kamen said:
TOS states that breast sizes bigger than 2 heads violate the TOS. But two head for what? The both breasts entirely or one breast?

I'd say one breast, given the current wiki definitions for large_breasts, huge_breasts and gigantic_breasts.

I just read forum #28997

it seems that people are against any post with gigantic_breasts on it. I understand enforcing the ToS, but are there not exceptions? is post #481790 grotesque?

Like I said in the other post, the artist for post #481790 is using the proportions for contrasting the two characters, and the breasts are not the focus. I could also see an artist using these proportions for comical purposes.

I agree that most gigantic_breasts would most probably fall under "grotesque" and that most of the current ones should probably be deleted, but should have an absolutist rule about this?

There aren't any gigantic_breasts posts I personally care for, but I just don't think this is the appropriate way to go about things

gigantic breasts are against the ToS, so if you want an image featuring those to be approved and not deleted, it'd best be of truly exceptional artistic merit.

sgcdonmai said:
gigantic breasts are against the ToS

I don't come to that conclusion from reading the ToS or the Wiki.

"It should be noted that breasts about this size are candidates for deletion under Danbooru's Terms of Service ("grotesque"). Tread cautiously when uploading pics that deserve this tag."

it's saying "posts with gigantic_breasts TEND to be grotesque and are CANDIDATES for deletion, so be careful when uploading them"

it's not the same as "Do NOT upload ANYTHING with gigantic_breasts, because gigantic_breasts=grotesque"

in post #481790 the artist was drawing a god. Gods are usually drawn with either really delicate features or really strong features. The artist decided to draw her with really strong features, that's why the breasts are of that size. I know this is only one post, but I'm saying that there are exceptions

also, how can post #614487 survive while post #489898 (which doesn't fall under the "at least two heads of size" category) is deleted? was it just because it was (incorrectly) tagged with gigantic_breasts? There aren't that many gigantic_breasts posts anyway, I think we can use our common sense to judge each individual post.

And please don't be confused, I do not want to keep most of these posts here. But I think that banning gigantic_breasts completely would be potentially discriminating against quality art which happened to have gigantic_breasts in it in a non-grotesque manner.