tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/5511 Wince tag discussion deux 2011-01-16T00:30:26-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/54380 2011-01-16T00:14:29-05:00 2011-01-16T00:30:26-05:00 @Hillside_Moose: Well if we're still keen on the wince tag, then... <p>Well if we're still keen on the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> tag, then I revised the wiki by deleting the second sentence, because I'm sure it's the cause of the "involuntary wink" usage. Other than that, I can only hope people remember to add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> when tagging and not leave it at <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a>.</p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/54328 2011-01-15T01:27:09-05:00 2011-01-15T01:27:09-05:00 @葉月: > jxh2154 said: > Agree on the first, but post... <blockquote><p>jxh2154 said:<br>Agree on the first, but <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/492557">post #492557</a> could easily be a wince, if say the comb is stuck in her hair and is pulling on it. It's hard to be sure.</p></blockquote><p>That's exactly what it seems to be. I can tell from experience that wince is exactly what your face does in this situation.</p> 葉月 /users/615 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/54290 2011-01-14T19:02:22-05:00 2011-01-14T19:02:22-05:00 @jxh2154: > S1eth said: definitely mistagged as wince: >... <blockquote><p>S1eth said: definitely mistagged as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a>:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/223843">post #223843</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/492557">post #492557</a>, many more</p></blockquote><p>Agree on the first, but <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/492557">post #492557</a> could easily be a wince, if say the comb is stuck in her hair and is pulling on it. It's hard to be sure.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/53924 2011-01-07T02:52:56-05:00 2011-01-07T03:05:29-05:00 @S1eth: > –verb (used without object) > 1. > to draw... <blockquote> <p>–verb (used without object)<br>1.<br>to draw back or tense the body, as from pain or from a blow; start; flinch.</p> <p>—Synonyms<br>1. blench, quail. Wince, recoil, shrink, quail all mean to draw back from what is dangerous, fearsome, difficult, threatening, or unpleasant. Wince suggests an involuntary contraction of the facial features triggered by pain, embarrassment, or a sense of revulsion: to wince as a needle pierces the skin; to wince at coarse language. </p> </blockquote><p>Examples of wincing (dictionary definition):<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/794936">post #794936</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/609804">post #609804</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/788100">post #788100</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/686767">post #686767</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/433748">post #433748</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/492114">post #492114</a><br>definitely mistagged as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a>:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/223843">post #223843</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/492557">post #492557</a>, many more</p><blockquote><p>Hillside_Moose said:<br>I've even noticed one user replace <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/780305">post #780305</a>, which is not helpful when it's still a wink by our definition of the word.</p></blockquote><p>Because of the current <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> wiki definition, I'm sure many users understood it this way:<br>wince: involuntary wink<br>wink: voluntary wink</p><p>The Japanese do draw most <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> as one eye closed, but not all of them:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/742521">post #742521</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/823588">post #823588</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/492044">post #492044</a>, <br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/789376">post #789376</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/617676">post #617676</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/414325">post #414325</a></p><p>Most of the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> posts are of sexual nature and the Japanese love to draw the women in pain during sex, so it isn't wrong for most of their <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> to also count as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a>.</p><p>So you can't alias to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a>, and adding <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> must be done manually to only those images that are actually "one eye closed". Of course, the wiki needs to be revised to clear up the confusion.</p> S1eth /users/53985 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/53919 2011-01-06T21:21:33-05:00 2011-01-16T00:14:29-05:00 @Hillside_Moose: The wince tag needs to be discussed again,... <p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> tag needs to be discussed again, because its usage is all over the place.</p><p><a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="http://danbooru.me/forum/show/32272">Last time it was discussed</a>, a wince doesn't necessarily mean an eye is closed or not, that it isn't a subset of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> or any other tag. However, a casual glance at the thumbnails show that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> is overwhelmingly used for a flinching, reflexive wink. I've even noticed one user replace <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/780305">post #780305</a>, which is not helpful when it's still a wink by our definition of the word.</p><p>So far, I can think of two solutions to deal with it:</p><ul> <li>Continue with the current <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> definition. Requires cleanup by adding <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> to posts missing the tag. All 81 pages of it.</li> <li>Alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/wink" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">wink</a> or nuke the tag, since the other meanings of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wince">wince</a> are lost on everyone. A more intuitive tag (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/flinch" title="This wiki page does not exist">flinch</a>?) should be added before doing so.</li> </ul><p>Thoughts?</p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307