Implicating blue_fire -> fire.

Reason: the former is a type of the latter.

Also

create implication purple_fire -> fire

create implication green_fire -> fire

create implication black_fire -> fire

create implication white_fire -> fire

We haven't even discussed why we would need all those color tags that where just created TODAY at all.

BTW, we already have blue_flame, which makes blue_fire redundant.

I really don't think the fire tags are necessary. Not to mention blue_fire or blue_flame requires manual checking of all black_rock_shooter images for that flaming eye.

S1eth said:
We haven't even discussed why we would need all those color tags that where just created TODAY at all.

BTW, we already have blue_flame, which makes blue_fire redundant.

We need them to differentiate different color flames.

Anyways flame and fire aren't the same.

Anelaid said:
We need them to differentiate different color flames.

Anyways flame and fire aren't the same.

A search for blue_fire flame returns blue flames.

So, at the very least, we don't need a tag blue flame, but we could use a tag blue fire.

Adding color tags for all fire tags is perhaps excessive as it is, but I certainly wouldn't want to double it up by distinguishing between color_flame and color_fire. flame and fire standalone I can support but all colors?

jxh2154 said:
Adding color tags for all fire tags is perhaps excessive as it is, but I certainly wouldn't want to double it up by distinguishing between color_flame and color_fire. flame and fire standalone I can support but all colors?

I'd say do color_fire, since fire is more widely used.

*bumps*

The implications above of "color_fire" -> "fire" have not been done yet.

In addition, please create this alias:

• blue_flame -> blue_fire

Reason:

Because blue_flame is filled with many pictures of blue fire, regardless of them depicting actual flames or not.

Done using _fire

Another, closely related, implication:

• pink fire -> fire

Done