tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/7197Tag confusion: covered_mouth and hidden_eyes2012-01-14T04:01:42-05:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/724172012-01-14T04:01:42-05:002012-01-14T04:01:42-05:00@Schrobby: What about blindfold? I think it belongs to...<p>What about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/blindfold">blindfold</a>? I think it belongs to that tag group as well.</p>Schrobby/users/254161tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/724092012-01-14T01:38:44-05:002012-01-14T01:39:26-05:00@S1eth: Covering_eyes (<-- gerund) is the action of...<p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/covering_eyes">Covering_eyes</a> (<-- gerund) is the action of using your limbs (arms, hands, anything prehensile) to actively cover your or someone else's eyes.</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hair_over_eyes">Hair_over_eyes</a> happens naturally and is an artistic style.</p>S1eth/users/53985tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/723822012-01-13T20:04:00-05:002012-01-13T20:04:00-05:00@Shinjidude: In that case we should add hair_over_eyes →...<p>In that case we should add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hair_over_eyes">hair_over_eyes</a> → <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/covering_eyes">covering_eyes</a> as an implication.</p>Shinjidude/users/1002tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/723742012-01-13T18:55:30-05:002012-01-13T18:55:30-05:00@jxh2154: Covered is probably better than hidden. I'd use...<p>Covered is probably better than hidden. I'd use it in a wider variety of ways. or covering_mouth / covering_eyes really. I wouldn't alias to hair_over_eyes though, because I'm sure there are many images of someone putting their hands or something else over someone's eyes.</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/719552012-01-07T11:42:21-05:002012-01-07T11:43:15-05:00@Shinjidude: Hidden eyes appears to be used synonymously...<p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hidden_eyes" title="This wiki page does not exist">Hidden eyes</a> appears to be used synonymously with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hair_over_eyes">hair over eyes</a> which is a much better established tag. Unless we need the additional generality, I'd move we alias in that direction. If we do need it, we should have an implication in the direction of whatever we decide the more general tag should be named.</p>Shinjidude/users/1002tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/719512012-01-07T10:50:21-05:002012-01-14T04:01:42-05:00@Benit149: I'm always getting covered mouth and hidden...<p>I'm always getting <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/covered_mouth" title="This wiki page does not exist">covered mouth</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hidden_eyes" title="This wiki page does not exist">hidden eyes</a> mixed up because 'hidden' and 'covered' practically share the same concept. Should there a cleanup so both of them use 'covered' or 'hidden'? Are there also other tags for these that I'm not aware of?</p>Benit149/users/248298