It's blatant what is going on in the pic, especially considering its child post, but no actual genitalia is shown. Would it pass as Questionable?
Posted under General
It's blatant what is going on in the pic, especially considering its child post, but no actual genitalia is shown. Would it pass as Questionable?
忍猫 said:
It's blatant what is going on in the pic, especially considering its child post, but no actual genitalia is shown. Would it pass as Questionable?
"Openly and unambiguously portrayed sex acts" are still very much Explicit.
Unbreakable said:
Just wanna check if they really qualify for a q rating (and the loli tag)
Text makes it clear that their disrobing is sexual, so Q/loli.
post #3350885 - Is that her pussy or not?
Looks like a sweatdrop.
Qpax insists that it's E, but it's just frontal nudity without special emphasis on the genitals.
It's questionable. She's sweating but that's about it. The pussy's not wet or or emphasized.
I'd keep it Q.
rated it as Q, because of depiction of a dead person in close
don´t know if it´s right
Guaro1238 said:
rated it as Q, because of depiction of a dead person in close
don´t know if it´s right
It's not, ratings only apply to sexual content.
The picture on the monitor is post #2165395. Is that enough to make this questionable, or is it too small to matter?
iridescent_slime said:
The picture on the monitor is post #2165395. Is that enough to make this questionable, or is it too small to matter?
Too small to matter.
iridescent_slime said:
The picture on the monitor is post #2165395. Is that enough to make this questionable, or is it too small to matter?
Without enlarging the image it looks like she's bottomless so I'd say q.
I uploaded it as questionable.
Tapper said:
There's nothing naughtier there than some midriff, cleavage and what can be construed as mild innuendo. It's Safe.
post #3591406 looks a bit too risqué for a safe rating.
kittey said:
post #3591406 looks a bit too risqué for a safe rating.
A bit risque, yes, but not quite Q if you ask me. Neither her crotch nor her chest is uncovered, and the context seems non-sexual.
post #3307007 and child: previously questionable loli, recently changed to safe loli, which is nonsense.
kittey said:
post #3307007 and child: previously questionable loli, recently changed to safe loli, which is nonsense.
I don't see why they would be rated q in the first place? Am I missing something?