hmmmm someone seems kinda butt hurt that the artist is defiling the series; at least no one else has ever done that before so we should be good. phew, crisis averted...
Explosion said: Nothing about this or any of the other crap this guy does is plausible. He's crudely trying to force a bunch of sexual nonsense into a series it doesn't belong in. It's not part of the series no matter how hard he trys to valid it.
It's sad as he started out nice, but then devolved into just another smut peddler.
For some reason I can't help but laugh seeing "smut peddler" used as an insult.
I can enjoy but non-sexual and sexual Touhou material but I guess it's not everyone's cup of tea.
The best part is that their responses more or less desexualize most of them. It'd be one thing if they were all screaming for cock, but the far-and-away most common response (or implied response) to the question is "none".
Kilgamayan said: The best part is that their responses more or less desexualize most of them. It'd be one thing if they were all screaming for cock, but the far-and-away most common response (or implied response) to the question is "none".
Even Yukari more or less (something most fan-artists wouldn't do as they tend to have Yukari be very 'experienced' in that area.)
I adore this Cirno. Also I gotta give thanks to the people posting and translating the commentary for his pictures, some of them you're not really getting the story without the commentary.
Explosion said: Nothing about this or any of the other crap this guy does is plausible. He's crudely trying to force a bunch of sexual nonsense into a series it doesn't belong in. It's not part of the series no matter how hard he trys to valid it.
It's sad as he started out nice, but then devolved into just another smut peddler.
The guy already says in the commentary of post #1343673 that all his series of this nature are wholly his own opinions and "what ifs".
Please don't judge without knowing the whole story. Take these all with a grain of salt.
I'd like to point out that post #605420, from over three years ago, is highly suggestive, and that post #1407103, from less than twenty-four hours ago, isn't suggestive in the slightest. Not only is the implication that he used to draw purely nonsexual things blatantly false, so is the implication that he now draws purely sexual things. And that's not even going into the fact that many artists draw both sexual and non-sexual things.
I don't have any.... After all, doesn't it hurt? That scares me...I don't get your question....but I wouldn't want to go through it....I like to give nice thoughts to those in their last moments, at least.I've... I've talked with some of my customers about it...