Would you rather have a pair of x-ray glasses or a pair of glasses that digitally removes clothes? Because it might not be long before we have the latter.
Would you rather have a pair of x-ray glasses or a pair of glasses that digitally removes clothes? Because it might not be long before we have the latter.
Keep in mind that actual x-rays, aside from potentially causing cancer from overexposure, only work when you have something that emits X-rays on the other side of what you are viewing. A computer creating a guess of what's below the clothes in real time is about the only thing that would actually result in what "x-ray glasses" are supposed to do.
Keep in mind that actual x-rays, aside from potentially causing cancer from overexposure, only work when you have something that emits X-rays on the other side of what you are viewing. A computer creating a guess of what's below the clothes in real time is about the only thing that would actually result in what "x-ray glasses" are supposed to do.
That and the most you would see of there.....assets woulf be a pale grey outline of them along with (obviously) the bone structure and any artifacts (buckles, buttons, clips, etc) from what shes wearing. Thats before you account for magnifaication due to the object to detector distance......ill shut up before this rant becomes a small book