Comments on post #1170841

@_cf on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2013-01-02T05:25:27-05:00

drunkenstyle said:
Nice backtracking.

You originally call it a fine art parody linking to the Wiki page implying you're using the term 'parody' to categorize this.

It's clearly obvious to everyone that this is not a parody, but a reference to the tower put into the game. <- This is not up for debate.

Go read what the tag means on the wiki. See if it mentions "parodying" there. This is about keeping things consistent. If people would rather keep this tag only for humorous homages (parody), then change the wiki's text.

@drunkenstyle on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-12-16T13:10:36-05:00

_cf said:
It's nice, yes, because it was the best case scenario.

See, I don't have to prove anything. fine art parody doesn't care for the artist's intention, but for referencing a classic, something this picture plainly does. If you can't see the referencing, I have nothing else to say.

For the records, I'm against a fine art referencing tag, because choosing between it and fine art parody would involve guessing the artist's intention, and that way lies madness.

Nice backtracking.

You originally call it a fine art parody linking to the Wiki page implying you're using the term 'parody' to categorize this.

It's clearly obvious to everyone that this is not a parody, but a reference to the tower put into the game. <- This is not up for debate.

@_cf on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-24T06:35:35-04:00

Saluki said:
Until you can prove that Vanilla meant to make a parody from Babel tower, instead of simple similarities, this is not a parody.

It's nice of you to assume that I'm clueless to the tag's usage and wiki.

It's nice, yes, because it was the best case scenario.

See, I don't have to prove anything. fine art parody doesn't care for the artist's intention, but for referencing a classic, something this picture plainly does. If you can't see the referencing, I have nothing else to say.

For the records, I'm against a fine art referencing tag, because choosing between it and fine art parody would involve guessing the artist's intention, and that way lies madness.

@FireSky3 on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-24T01:29:08-04:00

ThunderBird said:
What I still don't see is why it's a parody? It's not like it's making fun of the original, just a reinterpretation in a different style, which does not make it a parody...

This is what I had in mind. I recognized the drawing as the Tower of Babel, but not what made it a parody. I'm guessing a "fine art reference"-tag would suit it, though I don't know if such a tag would be used much. In any case, I'd say the tower of babel-tag should stay, given the clear inspiration.

@Sal.N on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-23T22:47:16-04:00

_cf said:
No, you're wrong.

fine art parody is used on Danbooru whenever a work references a classic. Don't remove a tag before understanding what it means.

Until you can prove that Vanilla meant to make a parody from Babel tower, instead of simple similarities, this is not a parody.

It's nice of you to assume that I'm clueless to the tag's usage and wiki.

@ThunderBird on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-23T08:46:15-04:00

_cf said:
No, you're wrong.

fine art parody is used on Danbooru whenever a work references a classic. Don't remove a tag before understanding what it means.

Hm. Interesting interpretation of the word 'parody'. But ultimately, I'll chalk it up to curbing tag proliferation.

@_cf on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-23T08:35:56-04:00

Saluki said:
This is official art of Silver Star tower from GrimGrimoire, not a parody.

No, you're wrong.

fine art parody is used on Danbooru whenever a work references a classic. Don't remove a tag before understanding what it means.

@Sal.N on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-23T07:51:05-04:00

This is official art of Silver Star tower from GrimGrimoire, not a parody.

@ThunderBird on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-23T00:20:02-04:00

What I still don't see is why it's a parody? It's not like it's making fun of the original, just a reinterpretation in a different style, which does not make it a parody...

@_cf on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-22T08:06:18-04:00

FireSky3 said:
What makes this a parody?

;_;

@FireSky3 on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-22T02:41:14-04:00

What makes this a parody?

@Bunny-senpai on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-21T20:47:49-04:00

... and then God fucked it up...

@_cf on post #1170841 ( vanillaware and 1 more )

2012-05-21T18:07:13-04:00

fine art parody