tag:danbooru.me,2005:/comments 2016-07-16T15:56:01-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/1562154 2016-07-16T15:56:01-04:00 2016-07-16T15:56:01-04:00 <img src="/cdn_image/preview/c7/63/c763a94e0d1175eb9fbe611f5217dbf2.jpg"/> <blockquote> <p>Provence said:</p> <p>Can someone confirm this as a nude filter? </p> </blockquote><p>Yes, I’m pretty sure it is. If you compare the <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="http://moemoe.pink/up/pink.moe00918.png">full-scale version</a> of this post (Google image search is your friend) with the parent <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1497418">post #1497418</a>, the editing is quite obvious in some areas:</p><ul> <li>The outer highlight along her left (our right) hip was not redrawn while removing the side-tie and ends pretty abruptly. I think the ’shopper forgot to finish that.</li> <li>Below her right (our left) breast there’s a brush stroke going over the chest outline.</li> <li>The areas where the straps over the shoulders were redrawn have bits of purple remaining near the otherwise skin-coloured lines. The brush strokes are also slightly visible. The ’shopper probably didn’t put too much effort into that. This is mostly visible in the full-size ’shop.</li> <li>All almost all lines have slight rainbowing from the scanning process (like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/chromatic_aberration">chromatic aberration</a>) and are rather soft, while the redrawn outlines are sharper and more solidly coloured. This is also mostly visible in the full-size ’shop.</li> </ul><p>I think the nude filter is based on a different scan from the same magazine image, explaining the slight rotation and different colours. The ’shopped image also seems to have some kind of noise-removal and light sharpening filters applied to it.</p><p>I think the missing rainbowing is the biggest indicator that this image was ’shopped after being scanned instead of being an alternate take by the artist.</p><p>... there’s also a horrible alternate nude filter of the same image available. :(<br>Those people should just stop wasting their time and look at images that are nude in the first place, if they must.</p> kittey /users/320377 tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/1560968 2016-07-13T17:12:41-04:00 2016-07-13T17:12:41-04:00 <img src="/cdn_image/preview/c7/63/c763a94e0d1175eb9fbe611f5217dbf2.jpg"/> <p>Can someone confirm this as a nude filter? <br>Because those posts aren't allowed here. </p> user_460797 /users/460797