Comments on post #3224147

@Claverhouse on post #3224147 ( original drawn by matilda_fiship)

2018-08-21T03:04:38-04:00

In that case physically, he'd still be male.

@RhythmicApogee on post #3224147 ( original drawn by matilda_fiship)

2018-08-16T23:58:40-04:00

*Double Shrug* She could be a genderswap example.

Apparently, no one here has heard of "Animal Genderbender", which is already Artistic License in full effect.

@honeymorph on post #3224147 ( original drawn by matilda_fiship)

2018-08-16T23:46:48-04:00

*Shrug* She could be trans.

@Claverhouse on post #3224147 ( original drawn by matilda_fiship)

2018-08-15T08:19:12-04:00

Very true. I wouldn't have noticed that. Definitely a silly mistake by the artist. Soft, pretty girl too.

Still it makes sense that moderns would feel Antler Envy on behalf of other species, and indignantly insist females totally would have antlers if they had antlers, and if females weren't suppressed by the Moosian Patriarchy.

Everyone knows Antlers are superior.

@Biwyk on post #3224147 ( original drawn by matilda_fiship)

2018-08-15T04:53:10-04:00

> Moose antlers
> Female

Does not compute.