tag:danbooru.me,2005:/commentsComments on post #35052852019-05-13T21:08:22-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/19163982019-05-13T21:08:22-04:002019-05-13T21:08:22-04:00@Saladofstones on post #3505285 (carl loevler (original) drawn by kamehame)<img src="/cdn_image/preview/36/9f/369f8b517ac0e2b323f4b1d72de3aea3.jpg"/>
<p>wasn't the name possibly "Carl Fritz Loffler"? </p>
Saladofstones/users/318380tag:danbooru.me,2005:Comment/19160072019-05-12T02:09:14-04:002019-05-12T02:09:14-04:00@henmere on post #3505285 (carl loevler (original) drawn by kamehame) <img src="/cdn_image/preview/36/9f/369f8b517ac0e2b323f4b1d72de3aea3.jpg"/>
<ul><li>
<a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201811100025.html">Prize-winning theologian accused of making stuff up (Asahi Shimbun, November 10, 2018 [JST])</a><br>
</li></ul><blockquote>
<p>Over the course of four pages, Fukai focused on a religious scholar by the name of Carl Loevler who purportedly writes about the significance of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche to religious studies today.</p>
<p>But there are no bibliographic notes for the quoted material that show when and where it was originally published.</p>
</blockquote>
henmere/users/68250