Comments on commenter:user_509825

@NexusLight2004 on post #2714563 (mario, master chief, and nathan drake (mario and 3 more) drawn by genzoman)

2020-04-08T02:23:44-04:00

Nathen and Chief looking back wondering what the f#%k that thing is while Mario smiling, knowing they’re about to learn how frustrating his racing can become.

@SneakyBoi on post #2678919 (jougasaki rika (idolmaster and 1 more) drawn by yamayoshi_tanosuke)

2019-09-10T18:55:17-04:00

I’m a little late, it’s called a prolapse.

@BanichkaSBoza on post #2706083 (fujiwara no mokou, rilakkuma, and kiiroitori (touhou and 1 more) drawn by shangguan_feiying)

2019-09-10T12:58:24-04:00

@LTalon on post #2711513 (adolf hitler (street fighter and 2 more) drawn by pazero)

2019-03-09T12:08:22-05:00

Catloaf said:

Is the VS. question "which version do you kill when you go back in time to kill Hitler?"

Neither. I don't want to live in the Red Alert timeline. That place has giant robots stomping around the USA and Russian mind control programs.

@Improvman_Epsilon on post #2323022 (reiuji utsuho and kaenbyou rin (touhou) drawn by peachems_(gemu))

2018-10-03T04:55:26-04:00

baconmeh2 said:

On an unrelated note, isn't this more of too_literal rather than pun?

yes

@baconmeh2 on post #2323022 (reiuji utsuho and kaenbyou rin (touhou) drawn by peachems_(gemu))

2018-10-02T15:55:07-04:00

On an unrelated note, isn't this more of too_literal rather than pun?

@Savoxgut on post #2759280 (nero claudius and nero claudius (fate and 1 more) drawn by hews_hack)

2018-07-11T19:02:43-04:00

wonderful!!!

@user_509926 on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-24T06:57:10-04:00

I do not not like this post and it adds nothing of importance to the site. My two cents.

@chilled_sake on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-24T06:47:10-04:00

Squishy said:

I was not aware that approvers were required to bring up discussions on undeleting old images that they come across should we decide the posts are worth including in the gallery.

It's more like, here's a controversial picture that had already been flagged multiple times with arguments in the comments, and then it gets approved without a word.

It's not like this is one of those rare, neglected pictures that catches a discerning approvor's eye, it's breaking a consensus.

@nonamethanks on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-13T16:29:58-04:00

Kikimaru said:

@Squishy
It's probably just 1 or 2 people in the Discord with a vendetta.

Or maybe it's just that this post looks like ass (pun intended).

@Squishy on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-12T23:29:25-04:00

@NWSiaCB

To be clear, the uploads in question were by various different users. It was the approvals of a user that I was going though. Sets of these approvals and their corresponding uploads were made months apart. There was a streak of flagged approvals in a two month time period that differ from usual flags (such as sample and duplicate) where the reasoning had me scratching my head.

I can PM you the exact details if you wish to verify this yourself, as I value your thoughts on the matter and would like your advice on whether or not I have overstepped in my actions.

@NWSiaCB on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-12T23:20:31-04:00

Squishy said:

I was going through other contributor's approvals to better understand how they judge images and to learn from their example.

I noticed that the approvals of one respected user (you can check whom in the mod logs) had streak of deleted posts, occurring months after their approval, for reasons other than being samples. After carefully considering what the flags were saying and weighing the merits of the image based on what I've learned from others' approvals, I decided to undelete some of these images.

I was not aware that approvers were required to bring up discussions on undeleting old images that they come across should we decide the posts are worth including in the gallery. I have observed that other approvers have undeleted old images but have not seen concurrent discussions, therefore I went ahead and undeleted these images. If that was out of line, then I apologize, although I do not know where these discussions should take place the next time I come across an image I think is worth keeping.

@Squishy
I can't help but find it extremely dubious that a "respected user" was going through a streak of deleted posts (or that you'd feel the need to qualify it as such). If they were that respected, the flags against their posts wouldn't have been upheld by all the approvers besides themselves.

When it comes to someone with unlimited uploads priveldges, unless there's someone actively watching everything they upload, not everything will be flagged until after it is noticed, which easily can take months. If someone is actually so consistently uploading things in need of flagging that it warrants someone - or multiple people - actively watching them to flag what they upload, then they are someone who clearly doesn't deserve the privileges they have.

@Kikimaru on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-12T16:30:43-04:00

Squishy said:

I was going through other contributor's approvals to better understand how they judge images and to learn from their example.

I noticed that the approvals of one respected user (you can check whom in the mod logs) had streak of deleted posts, occurring months after their approval, for reasons other than being samples. After carefully considering what the flags were saying and weighing the merits of the image based on what I've learned from others' approvals, I decided to undelete some of these images.

I was not aware that approvers were required to bring up discussions on undeleting old images that they come across should we decide the posts are worth including in the gallery. I have observed that other approvers have undeleted old images but have not seen concurrent discussions, therefore I went ahead and undeleted these images. If that was out of line, then I apologize, although I do not know where these discussions should take place the next time I come across an image I think is worth keeping.

@Squishy
It's probably just 1 or 2 people in the Discord with a vendetta.

@Squishy on post #2709690 (wendy (wendy's) drawn by senria)

2018-06-12T00:29:12-04:00

Flagger said:

I question that after two months of deleted status this post has been reapproved without discussion. I'd like to revisit this post for the reasons it was previously flagged for. The Aunt Fanny anatomy of this post is poor quality.

I was going through other contributor's approvals to better understand how they judge images and to learn from their example.

I noticed that the approvals of one respected user (you can check whom in the mod logs) had streak of deleted posts, occurring months after their approval, for reasons other than being samples. After carefully considering what the flags were saying and weighing the merits of the image based on what I've learned from others' approvals, I decided to undelete some of these images.

I was not aware that approvers were required to bring up discussions on undeleting old images that they come across should we decide the posts are worth including in the gallery. I have observed that other approvers have undeleted old images but have not seen concurrent discussions, therefore I went ahead and undeleted these images. If that was out of line, then I apologize, although I do not know where these discussions should take place the next time I come across an image I think is worth keeping.

@da_nuke on post #2736924 (toyosatomimi no miko (touhou) drawn by reddverse)

2018-05-01T01:15:21-04:00

🤔

@Horse404 on post #2693213 (ooi (kantai collection) drawn by shirubaburu)

2018-01-10T05:26:07-05:00

Reminds me of Kill la Kill's style

@Cliff_Edge on post #2706083 (fujiwara no mokou, rilakkuma, and kiiroitori (touhou and 1 more) drawn by shangguan_feiying)

2017-11-23T12:05:55-05:00

42.

@icewind on post #2721701 ( original drawn by hjl)

2017-10-31T17:48:24-04:00

How much for the one on the left?

@DanbooruBot on post #2690041 (link and gerudo link (the legend of zelda and 1 more) drawn by lost_one_zero)

2017-10-16T21:17:56-04:00

RaisingK replaced this post with a new image:

Old	lostonezero.deviantart.com/ar...o-Link-in-troubles-0-0-670940126	b1f2698a577d6d189257831aa3794c5b	jpg	1024 x 1676	238.6 KB
New	orig02.deviantart.net/908b/f/...s_0_0_by_lostonezero-db3gkpq.jpg	23a39ee9f55b6143a63d3283d4f15d63	jpg	1273 x 2084	354.8 KB

@LokiFawkes on post #2706083 (fujiwara no mokou, rilakkuma, and kiiroitori (touhou and 1 more) drawn by shangguan_feiying)

2017-09-18T04:04:59-04:00

19.1421356237...
My reasoning: In the one above, we have a symbol that is "chick and chick"
There is no operator between them in each pair of chicks, so logically if chick is a symbol of its own, then it is undefined or it is the square root of "chick and chick" Since we're clearly going after the premise that the one chick has been defined, then it's the latter, thus the chick is the square root of 2. So it's 5+1.41421356237...*10
Multiplication first and you have 5+14.1421356237...
The result is 19.1421356237...