Danbooru

Comments

Blacklisted:

Unbreakable said:

More or less, yes, unless you see male or female body parts. And it was an example showing that you can't always assume a charater's gender based on their covered body shape alone.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your stance. It sounds like you're suggesting that characters that are visually male and have no information contradicting their appearance shouldn't be tagged male if we decide that a character that is visually ambiguous from head to toe shouldn't be tagged as male. But because those characters are already tagged as male, the ambiguous character should also be tagged as male, for nothing more than consistency's sake.

That just simply doesn't make any sense. The only thing even relating the discussed characters is the lack of facial features.

Oogami Sakura in particular is an extremely fringe example that cannot be applied to the majority of cases. Most characters don't have such a visually contradicting appearance to their true nature.

Unbreakable said:

More or less, yes, unless you see male or female body parts. And it was an example showing that you can't always assume a charater's gender based on their covered body shape alone.

The thing about P-head Producer is that we know that it's based on the producer of the games (and has a male voice in Puchimasu!), so it doesn't turn heads when someone tags it as 1boy. So P-head is a different case than what we deal with in the other cases.

DreamFromTheLayer said:

The thing about P-head Producer is that we know that it's based on the producer of the games (and has a male voice in Puchimasu!), so it doesn't turn heads when someone tags it as 1boy. So P-head is a different case than what we deal with in the other cases.

Wait, P-head Producer is canon? I didn't know this, sorry.

Unbreakable said:

Wait, P-head Producer is canon? I didn't know this, sorry.

It's both non-canon and semi-canon, a really strange case. But pretty much 1boy.
Anyway, my only point was that it's hard to use as reference for this and the other cases.

DreamFromTheLayer said:

It's both non-canon and semi-canon, a really strange case. But pretty much 1boy.
Anyway, my only point was that it's hard to use as reference for this and the other cases.

Alright, gotcha.