should add WA to the fray for maximum hazard

zankde said:

should add WA to the fray for maximum hazard

Also Hiei and Isokaze from Kancolle. Now that's a violation of the Geneva Convention.

I'm going to assume they can't cook.

Ameer said:

I'm going to assume they can't cook.

Blue Poison is actually a decent cook, it's just no one eats her food because they're afraid she accidentally poisoned it, due to being a poison dart frog. Now it's a meme that she always slightly poisons her food, which makes it turn blue.

Burnt, poisoned, excessively spicy, or all-around terrible.
How will you choose to suffer?

Mettan said:

Burnt, poisoned, excessively spicy, or all-around terrible.
How will you choose to suffer?

starving

I agree with that creased shirt wholeheartedly

But what do the Japanese characters say?

Steak said:

But what do the Japanese characters say?

Unfolded, 胸大すぎ (My chest is too big). Folded, 大すき (with the diacritic on ぎ hidden in her armpit), which makes it "I like you a lot".

Steak said:

But what do the Japanese characters say?

The full phrase literally says "I'm too busty" while the creased one says "daisuki," meaning more or less "I like you".

At least with the shirt folded, it's true.

The t-shirt creators (and in our universe, Himura Kiseki) deserve a huge raise for that clever bilingual design.

I'm fortunate enough in the West never to have lived in such conditions --- like an endless tower of old tin cans --- although Europe had places of over-stuffed poverty,of course, like Naples; so can't imagine what it's like, either in Dhaka or Brazil. Although counter-revolutionary --- theoretically being a convinced Divine Right Monarchist --- in such places I can't see the benefit of not revolting and overthrowing the elected devils.

It never achieves anything, since it just transfers power from one set of politicians to another set; but at least it throws a scare into the rascals.

ceres said:

The reason that the deletion system exists is so that a standard of quality can be maintained. The gray area where the anatomy is bad enough to warrant adding the tags but not bad enough to warrant deletion is very small.

I think this image is within that grey area where the error is not glaring enough to warrant deletion though.

Honestly, I think most of the quality check flags that are filed on a daily basis are accurate and make sense to me.
But every once and a while I come across ones that are being overly critical, use spectacular weasel words or are too harsh over a minor flaw.

ceres said:

It doesn't help your case when only 9 of the 27 posts you've contested flag reasons on are currently deleted.

I'm not sure why my participation in other areas of the site having any bearing here, since the merits and flaws of each illustration have nothing to do with the track records of the users who are discussing image quality.

To be honest, I think you're the last person who should be bringing other peoples' past actions in these matters. Not since you lost your temper at the approval processing and sent hostile DMs to approvers for undeleting your flags. I can't say I've taken my disagreements that far nor have I ever had a spectacular streak of that magnitude.

Squishy said:
I'm not sure why my participation in other areas of the site having any bearing here, since the merits and flaws of each illustration have nothing to do with the track records of the users who are discussing image quality.

tbh if I see the same person appealing bad anatomy posts in the appeals page over and over again, at some point I'm just going to ignore all of that person's appeals without even bothering to check the picture.

nonamethanks said:

tbh if I see the same person appealing bad anatomy posts in the appeals page over and over again, at some point I'm just going to ignore all of that person's appeals without even bothering to check the picture.

One should also question someone's judgement if they keep appealing and defending multiple posts without anything happening. It's quite annoying to talk everytime against the same person.

Also upvoted the comments here. It helps no one when we make comments hidden since it destroys the reading flow.

ceres said:

1. This isn't another area of the site. I stated a fact about your comments where you contest flag reasons, which is what you did on this very post.

You haven't actually made any points about the images or my comments besides:
1. sharing condescending platitudes about quality
2. a thinly veiled attempt in telling me to get off the site
3. trying to undermine the weight of my words by bringing up my track record when you yourself haven't exactly had the most glowing score (8 out of 28) with regard to this area of the quality control.

2. I was never hostile towards any approvers. I never sent any hostile DMs to approvers. If you can prove otherwise, then go ahead, but please refer to this before making false accusations against me.

I didn't know who you were until I bothered to check why you were showing up in all recent discussions I was a part of until I checked and saw this. Whatever it is you sent people to receive a hostile response back via DM, it probably wasn't friendly.

That you've sent a DMail to me over flagging issues in the past with the same aggressiveness pretty much seals it.
Same tone, same passive aggressive hostility and inability to address arguments besides attacking people you disagree with.

It's also clear that someone has been going through my profile starting yesterday and reflagging old appeals, based on the reports, wording and timing of the anatomy tagging in the exact same timeframes. So if you take issue with 'history checks', don't be surprised.

3. I'm no-bumping this since the comments are not a place for you to start a grudge match.

Just so you know, I have no personal issues with you.

However, I am entitled to calling people out on their hypocrisy when they try calling the kettle black when they are pretty much a pot themselves. Were it anyone else remarking about my success rate or their approach on the matter as an approver, I would have no problems with it.

If anyone is making this into a grudge match, it is certainly not me for one spicy out call post, but rather the person who is making repeated attempts in analyzing me instead of the image, well after the discussion should have ended. I've pretty much ignored your attempts to lord over me about being my better about judging quality and trying to get rid of me to an ad-infested cancer site, however I think it's fair for me to scrutinize you over the same thing you're scrutinizing me over without breaking any etiquette.

ceres might not have DMed me but he did write some insulting feedback in my profile that he seems to conveniently omit, probably because it's since been deleted by a mod for being so bad. I can't help but roll my eyes at this argument, especially given that ceres went so far as to changing his name after the incident almost as if he knows he did wrong.

Unsurprisingly as soon as he was cut some slack some of my old images are flagged again, almost as if someone had gone back to their old shenanigans.