Danbooru

Comments

Blacklisted:

KandiKlover said:

please to make a child posts of the individual images.

If they exsit on the site you can do it your self you know

There are no visible comments.

kibehisa said:

The simple fact still stands that rumors are rumors and many other sources claim the rumors are bunk, including members of the task force who aren't exactly on good terms with PotUS Trump, saying his attendance is above average for this type of thing. Even Dr. Fauci, who contradicts PotUS Trump on nearly everything, has said that PotUS Trump is 'there more often than the other members'.
Furthermore, if you're believing rumors, rumors are suggesting that even taskforce members and Dr. Hahn in particular were blindsided by Bryan's comments and had no idea what he was talking about, indicating that this hadn't been discussed at the higher levels.

I suggest not believing everything you read from sources which are dedicated to taking down a sitting politician. I said the same thing during the Fmr.PotUS Obama's years (about what Republicans were saying) and I'm saying the same thing now about what is being said about PotUS Trump.
Very, very often both sides are lying.

Watching the absolute horror on that doctors face told me all i needed to know about this situation and it told me that the president has no clothes. No amount of "both sides" can change that involuntary look

iori98 said:

Watching the absolute horror on that doctors face told me all i needed to know about this situation and it told me that the president has no clothes. No amount of "both sides" can change that involuntary look

That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said/you quoted, and no amount of deflection can change that.
Whether the doctor was reacting to what they heard the President say, something they misheard/misunderstood and thought the President said, or something entirely different; expression reading and other forms of 'human lie detection' are not admissible evidence in courts for very, very many good reasons and it shouldn't be in an 'objective' court of public opinion either, if such could even exist.
The "both sides", as you referred to it, was in direct reference to the swirling rumors about politicians in general.

The issue that was being discussed was PotUS Trump supposedly suggesting injection/ingestion of Bleach or Isopropyl Alcohol, which the fact is clear he did not. Anyone who misheard or misunderstood him (which is easy given his speaking style) would be right to be shocked or utterly horrified, but that's not what he actually said nor (intentionally) implied anywhere in the ordeal and claiming he did is in obvious error in light of the transcripts.

Edit: Downvoted to hell in 2 minutes. That's how much of a kneejerk reaction anyone who defends PotUS Trump even on simple matters of easily verified statements can expect, I suppose. If he's wrong, he's wrong. But the simple fact is, he didn't say what people are saying he said.

Edit 2: blindVigil is correct, calling it 'downvoted to hell' was more hyperbolic than I usually like to allow in my commentary, my apologies.

Updated

kibehisa said:

That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said/you quoted, and no amount of deflection can change that.
Whether the doctor was reacting to what they heard the President say, something they misheard/misunderstood and thought the President said, or something entirely different; expression reading and other forms of 'human lie detection' are not admissible evidence in courts for very, very many good reasons and it shouldn't be in an 'objective' court of public opinion either, if such could even exist.
The "both sides", as you referred to it, was in direct reference to the swirling rumors about politicians in general.

The issue that was being discussed was PotUS Trump supposedly suggesting injection/ingestion of Bleach or Isopropyl Alcohol, which the fact is clear he did not. Anyone who misheard or misunderstood him (which is easy given his speaking style) would be right to be shocked or utterly horrified, but that's not what he actually said nor (intentionally) implied anywhere in the ordeal and claiming he did is in obvious error in light of the transcripts.

Edit: Downvoted to hell in 2 minutes. That's how much of a kneejerk reaction anyone who defends PotUS Trump even on simple matters of easily verified statements can expect, I suppose. If he's wrong, he's wrong. But the simple fact is, he didn't say what people are saying he said.

You can't say he didn't say it when he admitted it and said it was just sarcasm.

kibehisa said:

Edit: Downvoted to hell in 2 minutes. That's how much of a kneejerk reaction anyone who defends PotUS Trump even on simple matters of easily verified statements can expect, I suppose. If he's wrong, he's wrong. But the simple fact is, he didn't say what people are saying he said.

I dunno what your threshold is set to, but your comments aren't hidden from me with a -10 threshold, so I wouldn't call what might only be 1-3 downvotes "downvoted to hell"

iori98 said:

You can't say he didn't say it when he admitted it and said it was just sarcasm.

It was not sarcasm. He went on a tangent about his pondering of whether or not his "remedies" would work. It would be one thing if he made a passing comment or was even chuckling during the rant. He was genuinely curious and he only said it was "sarcasm" after he got ravaged for how stupid and dangerous his "suggestions" sounded.

But that's always the excuse I hear. Whenever he says something really stupid, so stupid that it can't be defended, he says he was only speaking "sarcastically" but then his supporters want me to believe he's the kind of guy that always speaks his mind and is a straight shooter. You can't be a straight shooter if every other comment you have is a "joke" that shouldn't be taken seriously.

If that's "sarcasm" then he's terrible at it.