tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/10067 Kantai Collection & Personification 2016-03-13T20:41:30-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/112803 2016-03-13T20:41:30-04:00 2016-03-13T20:41:30-04:00 @ghostrigger: bumping this thread, not exactly of kancolle... <p>bumping this thread, not exactly of <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=kancolle">kancolle</a> but because of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/personification">personification</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mecha_musume">mecha_musume</a>, and the girls corresponding ship type tags. we have limited Kantai Collection posts down only to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/original">original</a> only as i remembered, however there is also <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/zhan_jian_shao_nyu" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">zhan_jian_shao_nyu</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/pacific">pacific</a> (iowa in particular) now. should we clean these two as well? thoughts?</p> ghostrigger /users/352944 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/98069 2014-06-25T03:30:31-04:00 2014-06-25T03:30:47-04:00 @Log: Those all look acceptable for personification. ... <p>Those all look acceptable for personification.</p><p>As for mecha_musume I feel like if it has a huge chunk of ship like in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1696921">post #1696921</a> it would qualify. Just need to be careful about tag bloat.</p> Log /users/9509 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/98064 2014-06-25T01:54:24-04:00 2014-06-25T01:54:24-04:00 @OOZ662: > ghostrigger said: > > ships with the body of... <blockquote> <p>ghostrigger said:</p> <p>ships with the body of a humanoid female.</p> </blockquote><p>I think those were going to be <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mecha_musume">mecha_musume</a>.</p> OOZ662 /users/332700 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/98063 2014-06-25T01:51:47-04:00 2014-06-25T01:51:47-04:00 @ghostrigger: is there anyone against tagging the following... <p>is there anyone against tagging the following with personification?<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1655806">post #1655806</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1657139">post #1657139</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1657835">post #1657835</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1659777">post #1659777</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1659174">post #1659174</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1658594">post #1658594</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1657994">post #1657994</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1688635">post #1688635</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1687924">post #1687924</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1687287">post #1687287</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1686495">post #1686495</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1685727">post #1685727</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1685727">post #1685727</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1684999">post #1684999</a></p><p>how about some posts in <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=kantai_collection%20original">kantai_collection original</a>? should we start readding them?</p><p>and how about <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1526698">post #1526698</a> ? i still think this qualifies as 'personified ships' - ships with the body of a humanoid female.</p> ghostrigger /users/352944 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/98053 2014-06-24T16:51:38-04:00 2014-06-24T16:51:38-04:00 @user_201502: Good job! <p>Good job!</p> user_201502 /users/201502 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/98050 2014-06-24T15:37:32-04:00 2014-06-24T15:37:32-04:00 @Toks: Okay, mass edits are finally working so the... <p>Okay, mass edits are finally working so the personification tag was removed from these posts.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97929 2014-06-21T17:24:04-04:00 2014-06-21T17:27:48-04:00 @Toks: > jxh2154 said: > > Resubmitted the mass edit,... <blockquote> <p>jxh2154 said:</p> <p>Resubmitted the mass edit, tho I tried to do one earlier (ibuki → ibuki_(street_fighter)) that didn't seem to work so I ended up doing it all with tag scripts. Too many to do that for here tho, so we'll see if it works.</p> </blockquote><p>Just a guess, but: The delayed job for the earlier, broken mass edit was still in the queue when I looked earlier, so it's possible that it's backing up the newer, not-broken mass edits. If this is the case we might need to wait for it to expire (not sure how long this takes, but apparently 4 days isn't enough).</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97928 2014-06-21T17:18:48-04:00 2014-06-21T17:18:48-04:00 @jxh2154: > Toks said: > > Seems Albert ninja updated... <blockquote> <p>Toks said:</p> <p>Seems Albert ninja updated the server so if anyone wants to resubmit the mass edit it will probably work now.</p> </blockquote><p>Resubmitted the mass edit, tho I tried to do one earlier (ibuki → ibuki_(street_fighter)) that didn't seem to work so I ended up doing it all with tag scripts. Too many to do that for here tho, so we'll see if it works.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97819 2014-06-18T12:26:18-04:00 2014-06-18T12:26:18-04:00 @Toks: Seems Albert ninja updated the server so if... <p>Seems Albert ninja updated the server so if anyone wants to resubmit the mass edit it will probably work now.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97798 2014-06-17T20:25:02-04:00 2014-06-17T20:25:02-04:00 @Kikimaru: > Log said: > > Before we do anything... <blockquote> <p>Log said:</p> <p>Before we do anything post-purge I think we need to come to a consensus either way, purge and giant ship parts (most of which are already tagged mecha musume so I don't see the point here) or purge and save it for humanoid rensouhou-chan/kun or a third option I didn't think of.</p> </blockquote><p>Ah, didn't think of it that way.</p><p>Forget personification then for all KanColle girls; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mecha_musume">mecha_musume</a> is a much better tag.</p> Kikimaru /users/11314 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97796 2014-06-17T19:48:07-04:00 2014-06-17T19:49:22-04:00 @Log: Before we do anything post-purge I think we... <p>Before we do anything post-purge I think we need to come to a consensus either way, purge and giant ship parts (most of which are already tagged mecha musume so I don't see the point here) or purge and save it for humanoid rensouhou-chan/kun or a third option I didn't think of.</p> Log /users/9509 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97795 2014-06-17T19:32:48-04:00 2014-06-17T19:32:48-04:00 @OOZ662: > Kikimaru said: > > Could someone script to... <blockquote> <p>Kikimaru said:</p> <p>Could someone script to <strong>add</strong> personification to:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=kantai_collection%20cannon">kantai_collection cannon</a></p> </blockquote><p>I've been using <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/turret">turret</a>, personally. Dunno why I didn't think of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/cannon">cannon</a>.</p> OOZ662 /users/332700 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97794 2014-06-17T18:06:56-04:00 2014-06-17T18:07:10-04:00 @Toks: > jxh2154 said: > > I've nuked personification... <blockquote> <p>jxh2154 said:</p> <p>I've nuked personification from kantai_collection. (Or rather just queued it up, should finish in a bit).</p> </blockquote><p>It looks like it didn't work due to a bug. I think that I may have fixed the bug for the next version so you'll need to resubmit the mass edit later.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97793 2014-06-17T18:02:39-04:00 2014-06-17T18:04:31-04:00 @Kikimaru: Could someone script to add personification to:... <p>Could someone script to <strong>add</strong> personification to:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=kantai_collection%20cannon">kantai_collection cannon</a> <br>AND<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=kantai_collection%20mecha_musume">kantai_collection mecha_musume</a><br>?</p><p>*edit*<br>And maybe remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/personification">personification</a> from every KanColle character's wiki page.</p> Kikimaru /users/11314 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97789 2014-06-17T15:11:50-04:00 2014-06-17T15:11:50-04:00 @jxh2154: I don't really have an opinion on which images... <p>I don't really have an opinion on which images now qualify for the tag, but definitely agree we do not need to put it on every Kancolle image.</p><p>I've nuked personification from kantai_collection. (Or rather just queued it up, should finish in a bit).</p><p>I don't know if anyone compiled a list already but it seems as easy to do that after as to do it before, so once it's done processing, have at.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97666 2014-06-12T13:44:17-04:00 2014-06-12T13:44:17-04:00 @user_201502: > Toks said: > > Bumping threads that were... <blockquote> <p>Toks said:</p> <p>Bumping threads that were updated just a few days ago without adding anything new to the discussion is counterproductive. Only bump threads that haven't been updated in a month+ or so.</p> </blockquote><p>Okay, I'll remember that. Though, considering that nothing has been done about the issue in question for almost 2 months, something tells me that this thread would have been bumped sooner or later, regardless.</p> user_201502 /users/201502 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97661 2014-06-12T11:31:50-04:00 2014-06-12T11:34:35-04:00 @Toks: > D'Eye said:Bumping threads that were updated... <blockquote><p>D'Eye said:</p></blockquote><p>Bumping threads that were updated just a few days ago without adding anything new to the discussion is counterproductive. Only bump threads that haven't been updated in a month+ or so.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97655 2014-06-12T09:29:09-04:00 2014-06-12T09:29:09-04:00 @user_201502: > Fencedude said: > > So are we going to do... <blockquote> <p>Fencedude said:</p> <p>So are we going to do this or not?</p> </blockquote> user_201502 /users/201502 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97396 2014-06-01T22:18:55-04:00 2014-06-01T22:18:55-04:00 @OOZ662: I guess I misunderstood; I thought the tag was... <p>I guess I misunderstood; I thought the tag was going to apply to images involving the girls in their "battle dress" (i.e. wearing their stacks and/or turrets), which would comprise a non-trivial number of the existing posts and still require visually scanning 1,099 pages of posts. If by "humanoid turrets" you mean the two Rensouhous, it can just be purged and implicated to their tags.</p> OOZ662 /users/332700 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/97395 2014-06-01T22:11:45-04:00 2014-06-01T22:11:45-04:00 @Log: I fail to see any advantage in using a tag... <p>I fail to see any advantage in using a tag script to remove a tag from 21966 post over finding the 30-40 outliers and compiling a list. One will take minutes, one will take days and thousands of edit calls made one by one and they both require roughly the same amount of visual information.</p> Log /users/9509