create implication sweater_dress -> sweater
create implication sweater_dress -> dress
create implication sweater_lift -> clothes_lift
create implication off-shoulder_sweater -> sweater
create implication sweater_tug -> clothes_tug
create implication sweater_tug -> sweater
create implication argyle_sweater -> sweater
create implication argyle_sweater -> argyle
create implication sweater_pull -> clothes_pull
create implication sweater_pull -> sweater
create implication hooded_sweater -> sweater
create implication pink_sweater -> sweater
create implication white_sweater -> sweater
create implication sweater_jacket -> jacket
create implication nursing_sweater -> sweater
create implication print_sweater -> sweater
create implication black_sweater -> sweater
create implication yellow_sweater -> sweater
create implication blue_sweater -> sweater
create implication orange_sweater -> sweater
create implication plaid_sweater -> plaid

Link to request

Adding implications to sweater related tags that don't have them.

-1 on the first implication. It's not always tagged that way in practice, but "vest" should be for non-sweater vests. Excluding "sweater vest" in tag searches would not work for cases where both are worn (post #1940625) or different characters are wearing different types of vests (post #2006813).

I had a hard time deciding whether it should implicate vest or sweater. I went with the former because it resembles a vest more than a sweater. However, it could be its own thing. What do you think I should do?

I prefer having "sweater vest" as its own thing, implicating nothing.

Bulk update request #280 failed: Error: Antecedent name has already been taken (create implication shared_sweater -> sweater)

Fixed the problem.

Bulk update request #280 failed: Error: Antecedent name has already been taken (create implication plaid_sweater -> sweater)

Fixed for real. It should work this time.

The bulk update request #280 has been approved.