Danbooru

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

Grahf said:

post #3510571
But netorare implies a preexisting relationship, which I'd argue does not exist in this scenario based upon what's being seen visually.

Stating the netorare wiki

A form of cheating in which someone close to the protagonist is either willingly or unwillingly seduced and stolen away. This isn't necessarily limited to one's lover, but may also include friends, unrequited love interests, or even relatives.

As the wiki states: I think the netorare tag should stay on this picture, even tough I don´t fully agree with the wiki myself.

post #3810770

Is it appropriate to tag this flat_chest? With her posture you would be able to see some of her breasts unless she was flat (which she is, canonically), and on similar images with similar posture where the character is NOT flat, breast tags certainly apply. e.g. post #3771478

efk said:

post #3810770

Is it appropriate to tag this flat_chest? With her posture you would be able to see some of her breasts unless she was flat (which she is, canonically), and on similar images with similar posture where the character is NOT flat, breast tags certainly apply. e.g. post #3771478

Following the principle of "Tag what you see", I'd say that certainly qualifies as flat chest. Her chest is completely flat, there's not a hint of breasts, so it amply falls within the definition of that tag.

nonamethanks said:

Following the principle of "Tag what you see", I'd say that certainly qualifies as flat chest. Her chest is completely flat, there's not a hint of breasts, so it amply falls within the definition of that tag.

Thanks for clarifying. It's one of those amusing cases of tag what you don't see though, I feel. I'll add it.

Benit149 said:

post #3812649

Is there a tag for when artists denote that they don't want their works reposted/used without permission?

Haven't seen any other cases right in the picture like that, since they're usually in the commentary, but maybe something like repost notice can be created for when it's in the picture.

Prinz_Poigen said:

howto:rate says "Clearly visible sexual fluids (cum and pussy juice)." should be tagged explicit, but pussy_juice -rating:e has a count of 4898. Is this not the rule anymore or has it always been just a suggestion that you're free to ignore?

The rule is still in place, just people mistagging/misrating.