Tag implication: applying_makeup -> makeup

@Type-kun: The tag implication applying_makeup -> makeup...

2016-11-02T14:18:20-04:00

The tag implication applying_makeup -> makeup has been rejected.

@user_460797: > iridescent_slime said: > > The present...

2016-08-06T10:10:48-04:00

iridescent_slime said:

The present description for the makeup tag states:

If it hasn't already been applied, we use the cosmetics tag, not makeup. This makes it possible when searching to distinguish makeup that's being worn from products still in their containers. Note that lipstick tube doesn't imply lipstick.

So that this should get changed to imply cosmetics.

@iridescent_slime: The present description for the makeup tag...

2016-08-06T10:04:57-04:00

The present description for the makeup tag states:

Used to denote characters wearing cosmetics on the face.

If it hasn't already been applied, we use the cosmetics tag, not makeup. This makes it possible when searching to distinguish makeup that's being worn from products still in their containers. Note that lipstick tube doesn't imply lipstick.

@user_460797: Yeah, but we see the lipstick tube's content^^.

2016-08-05T10:10:21-04:00

Yeah, but we see the lipstick tube's content^^.

@user_441999: They may not actually be wearing the makeup...

2016-08-05T09:42:23-04:00

They may not actually be wearing the makeup yet, like in post #15214 .

@user_460797: create implication applying_makeup -> makeup ...

2016-08-03T23:20:19-04:00

create implication applying_makeup -> makeup

Link to implication

OI think that is obvious?