tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/13190Tag implication: repair_bucket -> bucket2016-09-20T03:16:00-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1202702016-09-20T03:16:00-04:002016-09-20T03:16:00-04:00@user_441999: > Hillside_Moose said:
>
> Well it didn't work...<blockquote>
<p>Hillside_Moose said:</p>
<p>Well it didn't work here, did it?</p>
<p>If the implication really is obvious, I'll let it slide. If not, I'll call it out for the lazy, boilerplate reason that it is, alongside "Obvious" and "[REASON FIELD INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]". It just tells me whoever submitted the implication didn't bother checking the tags for exceptions and is passing the buck to someone else.</p>
</blockquote><p>In other words:<br>When the implication is right you'll be generous and let it slide - but one should still feel ashamed of it, even though any other reason given would be worse/pointlessly convoluted.<br>When the implication turns out to be not right due to something the person making the implication didn't think of then it's suddenly unforgivable.</p><p>Am I really reading you right here?</p><p>Incidentally, I did check before making this implication, and would still describe your exception as a bucket, just as I would <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2364987">post #2364987</a> where they are filled with ice cream. I accept the implication is invalid due to the potential for it to be <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/adapted_object">adapted</a> into something that is not a bucket, which I confess to not thinking of, but there are no examples of this at present, so is it really something worthy of shame? </p>user_441999/users/441999tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1202692016-09-20T02:20:02-04:002016-09-20T02:24:35-04:00@Hillside_Moose: > kuuderes_shadow said:
>
> What?
>
> So how...<blockquote>
<p>kuuderes_shadow said:</p>
<p>What?</p>
<p>So how else are you going to do implications like in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/13194">topic #13194</a></p>
</blockquote><p>Well it didn't work here, did it?</p><p>If the implication really is obvious, I'll let it slide. If not, I'll call it out for the lazy, boilerplate reason that it is, alongside "Obvious" and "[REASON FIELD INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]". It just tells me whoever submitted the implication didn't bother checking the tags for exceptions and is passing the buck to someone else.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1202652016-09-20T02:04:25-04:002016-09-20T02:04:25-04:00@user_441999: > Hillside_Moose said:
>
> Also, "X_Y is an X...<blockquote>
<p>Hillside_Moose said:</p>
<p>Also, "X_Y is an X Y" reasons are bad and you should feel bad.</p>
</blockquote><p>What?</p><p>So how else are you going to do implications like in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/13194">topic #13194</a></p>user_441999/users/441999tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1202312016-09-20T00:06:44-04:002016-09-20T00:06:44-04:00@Hillside_Moose: The tag implication repair_bucket -> bucket has...<p>The tag implication repair_bucket -> bucket has been rejected.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1202302016-09-20T00:06:36-04:002016-09-20T00:06:36-04:00@Hillside_Moose: You have post #2177322 which are pudding cups...<p>You have <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2177322">post #2177322</a> which are pudding cups instead of buckets.</p><p>Also, "X_Y is an X Y" reasons are bad and you should feel bad.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1200682016-09-15T22:45:43-04:002016-09-15T22:46:13-04:00@EB: This kind of implication shouldn't be done for...<p>This kind of implication shouldn't be done for specific series items like this. What if there's a parody <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/adapted_object">adapting</a> it into a different kind of object?</p>EB/users/11672tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1200102016-09-15T03:05:51-04:002016-09-15T03:05:51-04:00@user_441999: create implication repair_bucket -> bucket
...<p>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/repair_bucket">repair_bucket</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/bucket">bucket</a></p><p><a class="dtext-link" href="/tag_implications?search%5Bid%5D=7160">Link to implication</a></p><p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/repair_bucket">repair bucket</a> is a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/bucket">bucket</a>.</p>user_441999/users/441999