create implication american_flag_print -> flag_print
create implication american_flag_print -> american_flag
create implication bat_print -> animal_print
create implication bear_print -> animal_print
create implication bird_print -> animal_print
create implication bunny_print -> animal_print
create implication butterfly_print -> animal_print
create implication carrot_print -> food_print
create implication cat_print -> animal_print
create implication cherry_print -> food_print
create implication cow_print -> animal_print
create implication dog_print -> animal_print
create implication fish_print -> animal_print
create implication frog_print -> animal_print
create implication goldfish_print -> fish_print
create implication heart_print -> heart
create implication leopard_print -> animal_print
create implication maple_leaf_print -> leaf_print
create implication mushroom_print -> food_print
create implication panda_print -> bear_print
create implication rose_print -> floral_print
create implication skull_print -> skull
create implication spider_print -> animal_print
create implication strawberry_print -> food_print
create implication sunflower_print -> floral_print
create implication tiger_print -> animal_print
create implication watermelon_print -> food_print
create implication whale_print -> fish_print
create implication zebra_print -> animal_print

Link to request

Even though I cleaned up the *_print tags to eliminate excess tags that only had -10 posts or so, I'm not going to request for every type of *_print tag to have its physical counterpart implicated for now until they're better populated like these ones.

I'm leaving space print and starry sky print alone until the issue in forum #123154 is resolved.

Question about cross_print: Does this mean that any nurse caps that bear the symbol should have this tag added to it as well? I would hope not, because then it would drown out the other items that have the cross printed on it.

Question about food_print: Should it really be food_themed_print to go with the other food_themed_* tags here?

If you don't mind my asking, what's the purpose of this?

It seems that this would dilute the physical things that are being implicated. When searching for an animal, say a zebra, I wouldn't expect to find something like post #2420059 or post #2106136.

^ does have a point. I do agree with the superset implications that still are prints though (cat print / dog print / tiger print -> animal print, etc). It's just that the physical things being implicated should probably be left out.

I'll strike out the physical things from the list then.

EDIT: Done, but I left heart_print -> heart alone since that's a symbol rather than a physical object, and both star_print and musical_note_print have the original symbol implicated to them too.

So... instead of apple_print, I should use apple food_print, right?
with the implication (apple - fruit - food), post #1391181 got food tag even though there're no real food. Is it ok?

zeparoh said:

So... instead of apple_print, I should use apple food_print, right?
with the implication (apple - fruit - food), post #1391181 got food tag even though there're no real food. Is it ok?

I did that as a way to curb the unnecessary food print tags that were beginning to pile up in the *_print search. If you're able to find more posts with apple_print clothes and/or objects and populate the tag, then an implication to food_print could be made. As far as the food tag goes, I'm sure there are tons of posts that have food imagery but no actual food in it despite the food tag being used.

The bulk update request #980 has been approved.