tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/13497 (Short) Twintails vs. Two Side up 2016-12-17T21:39:09-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/124066 2016-12-17T21:39:09-05:00 2016-12-17T21:40:40-05:00 @Mikaeri: > Flopsy said: > > +1 to letting two_side_up... <blockquote> <p>Flopsy said:</p> <p><strong>+1</strong> to letting <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two_side_up</a> imply <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a>. It makes sense as a subset, and it's just one negated tag to add in those cases where one is only interested in "full" twintails.</p> <p>I'm not sure there's any meaningful difference between <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one_side_up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side_ponytail</a> as actually tagged. The wiki for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side_ponytail</a> cites <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/flandre_scarlet">flandre_scarlet</a> as an example, but she usually doesn't have all or even most of her hair bunched up in her side tail. That said, <strong>+1</strong> to letting the former imply the latter anyway. With that implication, none of the existing <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side_ponytail</a> taggings will be incorrect, and people can add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one_side_up</a> wherever it applies, if they want to bother.</p> </blockquote><p>Ah, you're right on that note, save for if there's one character with two side up and another with full twintails, which is what kuudere seemed to imply in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/123663">forum #123663</a>. It seems to be a "here and there" thing though, but I may be wrong. I haven't looked through <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=multiple_girls%20two_side_up%20twintails">multiple_girls two_side_up twintails</a> extensively. Heck, we might even be running into the same problem searching for that already, because again with the assumption of some <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> styles being <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> also.</p><p>I do understand the importance of keeping them separate, but the fact of the matter is that a lot of taggers are divided on whether to tag them one, the other, or both in the appearance of a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> hairstyle. It's especially apparent since some of the less experienced taggers won't know about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> and tag <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> anyway because it's what they see.</p><p>It's a very unclean divide, and I think that if either <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a> are supersets of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> respectively, then gardening for both of the latter tags will be much easier than how it is right now.</p><p>For now I'll also be <strong>+1</strong> on the tentative implications of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>, but this is a huge decision; these are tags that are very popular in the database, so before I (or someone else) make the implication I do want others to chime back into this discussion.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/124065 2016-12-17T21:22:45-05:00 2016-12-17T21:22:45-05:00 @Flopsy: +1 to letting two_side_up imply twintails. It... <p><strong>+1</strong> to letting <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two_side_up</a> imply <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a>. It makes sense as a subset, and it's just one negated tag to add in those cases where one is only interested in "full" twintails.</p><p>I'm not sure there's any meaningful difference between <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one_side_up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side_ponytail</a> as actually tagged. The wiki for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side_ponytail</a> cites <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/flandre_scarlet">flandre_scarlet</a> as an example, but she usually doesn't have all or even most of her hair bunched up in her side tail. That said, <strong>+1</strong> to letting the former imply the latter anyway. With that implication, none of the existing <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side_ponytail</a> taggings will be incorrect, and people can add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one_side_up</a> wherever it applies, if they want to bother.</p> Flopsy /users/118142 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123731 2016-12-10T04:00:48-05:00 2016-12-10T11:01:26-05:00 @Mikaeri: > kuuderes_shadow said: > > In what... <blockquote> <p>kuuderes_shadow said:</p> <p>In what circumstances would you say it's right to tag <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> in reference to the same character's hairstyle then? Ditto with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a> on the same hairstyle.</p> <p>If you think it's not necessarily wrong to tag a hairstyle with both tags then you must think there are circumstances in which doing so is the right thing to do and thus that it would be wrong not to tag them with both.</p> </blockquote><p>I'm still most likely echoing the same sentiment I had in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/123647">forum #123647</a>, that I think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> is basically a subset of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> is a subset of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>. That's why I don't disagree with them tagging them both. Why I say it's not necessarily wrong is because I think taggers are inclined to tag both when they're unsure (due to the fact that the bulk of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> "tails" can really vary) or share the same opinion as I do, since both (if considered separate hairstyles) embody part of the other's style.</p><p>I've almost always tagged <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> alone when I see it. It's just now I have this passing thought where it does make sense that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> is <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a>, but I do understand the concern if one get merged into the other as a subset -- it makes searching for twintails where pretty much all of the bulk of the hair is tied into twintails harder. Maybe one solution is to have a tag for the kind of twintails that does have that feature, and then have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> be a wholly encompassing tag that both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> and the proposed tag implicate, but the problem is that that kind of solution isn't really intuitive for anyone. And it would require an ungodly amount of gardening.</p><p>And of course, the same kind of problem with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>, although that one I consider to be much more obvious. It's just that the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> tag is not very much prevalent. Before this discussion I wasn't even aware that tag existed.</p><p>EDIT: Added some clarification.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123727 2016-12-10T03:21:01-05:00 2016-12-10T03:21:01-05:00 @user_441999: In what circumstances would you say it's right... <p>In what circumstances would you say it's right to tag <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> in reference to the same character's hairstyle then? Ditto with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a> on the same hairstyle.</p><p>If you think it's not necessarily wrong to tag a hairstyle with both tags then you must think there are circumstances in which doing so is the right thing to do and thus that it would be wrong not to tag them with both.</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123714 2016-12-09T19:05:11-05:00 2016-12-09T19:35:33-05:00 @Mikaeri: > kuuderes_shadow said: > > With regards the... <blockquote> <p>kuuderes_shadow said:</p> <p>With regards the half updo I was referring specifically to the ponytail version. Although I changed the post as I went along in a way that made the comparison less relevant anyway.</p> <p>With regards the overlap, bear in mind that more than half the images in both cases have multiple characters on them, and in a lot of those cases there are two characters with the different hairstyles. Other cases are probably just people adding both in confusion, or adding one but forgetting to remove the other.</p> </blockquote><blockquote> <p>EB said:</p> <p>There actually isn't really a tag for the ponytail version (some don't have a visible <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/half_updo">half_updo</a>. See for example, Tenshi: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/677440">post #677440</a> ). I brought that up at the end of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/7079">topic #7079</a>, but there were no suggestions on what to name it.</p> </blockquote><p>If it were me and I saw an entry with a single girl with a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/half_updo">half updo</a> hairstyle that ended in a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ponytail">ponytail</a>, I would just tag both hairstyles in. A half updo + a ponytail still has a ponytail in it, despite it being nontraditional. But if we were to come up with some sort of a tag name for it, maybe... <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/half_updo_into_ponytail" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">half_updo_into_ponytail</a>? Sounds a bit long, but I think it would be okay.</p><p>In regards to the overlap, it's probably the case that people are just adding both in conclusion, but I wouldn't necessarily say it's wrong to tag an entry with both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>. If we look at the searches again with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/1girl">1girl</a>:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=two_side_up%20twintails%201girl">two_side_up twintails 1girl</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=two_side_up%20-twintails%201girl">two_side_up -twintails 1girl</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=one_side_up%20side_ponytail%201girl">one_side_up side_ponytail 1girl</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=one_side_up%20-side_ponytail%201girl">one_side_up -side_ponytail 1girl</a></p><p>There is still a considerably large overlap versus a large mutual exclusion between the pairs.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123674 2016-12-09T09:47:10-05:00 2016-12-09T09:47:10-05:00 @EB: There actually isn't really a tag for the... <p>There actually isn't really a tag for the ponytail version (some don't have a visible <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/half_updo">half_updo</a>. See for example, Tenshi: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/677440">post #677440</a> ). I brought that up at the end of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/7079">topic #7079</a>, but there were no suggestions on what to name it.</p> EB /users/11672 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123663 2016-12-09T04:33:42-05:00 2016-12-09T04:39:42-05:00 @user_441999: With regards the half updo I was referring... <p>With regards the half updo I was referring specifically to the ponytail version. Although I changed the post as I went along in a way that made the comparison less relevant anyway.</p><p>With regards the overlap, bear in mind that more than half the images in both cases have multiple characters on them, and in a lot of those cases there are two characters with the different hairstyles. Other cases are probably just people adding both in confusion, or adding one but forgetting to remove the other.</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123660 2016-12-09T03:29:54-05:00 2016-12-09T03:29:54-05:00 @chilled_sake: > CodeKyuubi said: > > Hmm, I've always... <blockquote> <p>CodeKyuubi said:</p> <p>Hmm, I've always interpreted it as a smaller portion of a greater hair amount, because calling it twintails instead kind of goes against the classic interpretation of twintails.</p> </blockquote><p>Okay well I've made a slight <a class="dtext-link" href="/wiki_page_versions/diff?otherpage=200033&amp;thispage=184355">modification</a> to the wiki to clarify that and someone can further alter it as they see fit.</p> chilled_sake /users/463832 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123659 2016-12-09T03:25:57-05:00 2016-12-09T03:25:57-05:00 @CodeKyuubi: > sweetpeɐ said: > > Well small portion reads... <blockquote> <p>sweetpeɐ said:</p> <p>Well small portion reads to me as a limitation on length as well. Judging by the alternate interpretation that length is not in consideration than sure they are two side up but my intuitive understanding is that they are meant to be like short twintails with the rest of the hair falling another way.</p> </blockquote><p>Hmm, I've always interpreted it as a smaller portion of a greater hair amount, because calling it twintails instead kind of goes against the classic interpretation of twintails. </p> CodeKyuubi /users/81291 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123658 2016-12-09T03:24:04-05:00 2016-12-09T03:24:04-05:00 @chilled_sake: > CodeKyuubi said: > > All of those look like... <blockquote> <p>CodeKyuubi said:</p> <p>All of those look like proper usage of two side up to me. The wiki specifically states Toosaka Rin as an example of two side up, in that a portion of the hair is tied up into two tails, specifying amount rather than length.</p> </blockquote><p>Well small portion reads to me as a limitation on length as well. Judging by the alternate interpretation that length is not in consideration than sure they are two side up but my intuitive understanding is that they are meant to be like short twintails with the rest of the hair falling another way.</p> chilled_sake /users/463832 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123656 2016-12-09T03:22:12-05:00 2016-12-09T03:22:12-05:00 @Mikaeri: > Provence said: > > I don't quite agree with... <blockquote> <p>Provence said:</p> <p>I don't quite agree with the ponytail - half updo connection. <br>The definition of half updo does not include ponytail anywhere. A ponytail could still be there, but is not essential. For example, there could also be a braid instead of a ponytail.</p> </blockquote><p>Yeah, that's what I was making out -- that that connection shouldn't be made. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/half_updo">Half updo</a> just refers to the hair at the temples. If they happen to be long enough, they can form ponytails or braids, but you'll often see them in a "princess knot" form too, which doesn't feature that at all.</p><blockquote><p>A hairstyle that consists of the hair at the temples pulled back into a bun, short ponytail, or just a bow at the back of the head, while the rest of the hair remains flowing loosely.</p></blockquote> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123654 2016-12-09T03:15:52-05:00 2016-12-09T03:15:52-05:00 @user_460797: I don't quite agree with the ponytail - half... <p>I don't quite agree with the ponytail - half updo connection. <br>The definition of half updo does not include ponytail anywhere. A ponytail could still be there, but is not essential. For example, there could also be a braid instead of a ponytail. </p> user_460797 /users/460797 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123652 2016-12-09T03:13:53-05:00 2016-12-09T03:13:53-05:00 @Mikaeri: I suppose so, but my gripe with it is that it... <p>I suppose so, but my gripe with it is that it just doesn't seem intuitive enough to grasp. Albeit if the implication did exist, then users would have to search something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=side_ponytail%20-one_side_up">side_ponytail -one_side_up</a> if they didn't want to see hairstyles that were <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a>. Even on <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/shimada_arisu">Shimada Arisu</a>'s wiki page it says this:</p><blockquote><p><strong>Person:</strong> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/light_brown_hair">light brown hair</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/brown_eyes">brown eyes</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/long_hair">long hair</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/bangs">bangs</a></p></blockquote><p>Perhaps the wiki page could stand to use a revision by adding it in, but so the same would have to go for most characters that feature a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> hairstyle.</p><p>The split between some of them is incredibly vast though:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=two_side_up%20twintails">two_side_up twintails</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=two_side_up%20-twintails">two_side_up -twintails</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=-two_side_up%20twintails">-two_side_up twintails</a></p><p>And also for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=one_side_up%20side_ponytail">one_side_up side_ponytail</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=one_side_up%20-side_ponytail">one_side_up -side_ponytail</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=-one_side_up%20side_ponytail">-one_side_up side_ponytail</a></p><p>I semi-agree with you on <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ponytail">ponytail</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/half_updo">half updo</a> though. Half updos <em>can</em> have a ponytail (and there are certainly styles with both), but it isn't necessary. Half updos can end with a knot or a ribbon, after all.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123651 2016-12-09T03:12:05-05:00 2016-12-09T03:13:04-05:00 @CodeKyuubi: > sweetpeɐ said: > > Some characters are... <blockquote> <p>sweetpeɐ said:</p> <p>Some characters are tagged as two side up although the portion tied up may actually much longer than the wiki provides for (e.g. <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2563836">post #2563836</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin">toosaka_rin</a> in general; another example, past shoulder length: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2560223">post #2560223</a>).</p> <p>Also <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sidelocks">sidelocks</a> are often inappropriately tagged two side up such as in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2562196">post #2562196</a>.</p> <p>Here is another two side up that runs too long <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2561271">post #2561271</a>.</p> <p>So if there were an implication I guess it would have to be straight to twintails instead of short twintails since things are pretty messy.</p> </blockquote><p>All of those look like proper usage of two side up to me. The wiki specifically states Toosaka Rin as an example of two side up, in that a portion of the hair is tied up into two tails, specifying amount rather than length. </p> CodeKyuubi /users/81291 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123650 2016-12-09T03:08:31-05:00 2016-12-09T03:09:16-05:00 @chilled_sake: Some characters are tagged as two side up... <p>Some characters are tagged as two side up although the portion tied up may actually much longer than the wiki provides for (e.g. <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2563836">post #2563836</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin">toosaka_rin</a> in general; another example, past shoulder length: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2560223">post #2560223</a>).</p><p>Also <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sidelocks">sidelocks</a> are often inappropriately tagged two side up such as in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2562196">post #2562196</a>.</p><p>Here is another two side up that runs too long <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2561271">post #2561271</a>.</p><p>So if there were an implication I guess it would have to be straight to twintails instead of short twintails since things are pretty messy.</p> chilled_sake /users/463832 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123649 2016-12-09T03:05:36-05:00 2016-12-09T03:06:09-05:00 @user_441999: To give my personal opinion on... <p>To give my personal opinion on combinations/implications/aliases in this area:</p><p>ponytail -------- half updo<br>twintails ------- two side up<br>side ponytail --- one side up</p><p>I see these three relations to be relatively similar, and think that in each case the one on the left is a distinctly different hairstyle the one on the right. I would thus be opposed to any proposal that led to their combination.</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123647 2016-12-09T02:53:07-05:00 2016-12-09T02:53:07-05:00 @Mikaeri: > kuuderes_shadow said: > > I've never had... <blockquote> <p>kuuderes_shadow said:</p> <p>I've never had problems with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> vs. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a>. But I do have difficulty between <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>. Applying the logic of "one side up = two side up but only up on one side" then various characters that routinely get tagged with side ponytail should be one side up instead. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/shimada_arisu">Shimada Arisu</a> mentioned above is one of them. Most pictures of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/hagikaze_%28kantai_collection%29">Hagikaze (kantai collection)</a> would also fall into this category.</p> </blockquote><p>I think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a> is probably more thought of than <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> when that sort of hairstyle is seen, actually. It never occurred to me that we even had a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> tag. But if my opinion is anything worth, I think that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> is essentially a subset of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>, just like how I think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> is ideally a subset of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a> if we're defining twintails as just two bunched up tails of hair without regard to the bulk or portion of the rest of the hair drooping down. I'm for those implications, but I do want to discuss this a bit more before coming to any rapid conclusions.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123646 2016-12-09T02:45:17-05:00 2016-12-09T02:45:17-05:00 @user_441999: I've never had problems with two side up vs.... <p>I've never had problems with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/two_side_up">two side up</a> vs. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/twintails">twintails</a>. But I do have difficulty between <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_side_up">one side up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/side_ponytail">side ponytail</a>. Applying the logic of "one side up = two side up but only up on one side" then various characters that routinely get tagged with side ponytail should be one side up instead. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/shimada_arisu">Shimada Arisu</a> mentioned above is one of them. Most pictures of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/hagikaze_%28kantai_collection%29">Hagikaze (kantai collection)</a> would also fall into this category.</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123643 2016-12-09T02:29:51-05:00 2016-12-09T02:33:30-05:00 @Mikaeri: From the subsection ツーサイドアップ of ツインテール on... <p>From the subsection ツーサイドアップ of <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%84%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%86%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB">ツインテール on Wikipedia</a> (super quick and rough translation):</p><blockquote><p>A hairstyle where hair on the head is bunched up and tied on both sides around the top of the ear, while all the rest of the hair hangs back (put the sides up). Since it looks like a completely different hairstyle from twintails, however, it tends to be called a different hairstyle entirely: "two side up". The hairstyle takes its name from doll culture and has almost nothing in common with twintails save for the fact that both hairstyles feature two tied up bunches of hair. Two side up often looks like ordinary long hair rather than twintails. It sometimes is called "rabbit knot" (because the hairstyle resembles the silhouette of a rabbit) or "half twintails". However, because both hairstyles bunch up long hair together into two parts, two side up is sometimes erroneously referred to as twintails, but the difference between the two is fairly ambiguous.</p></blockquote><p>EDIT: Well, it seems we have our origins for the hairstyle name now.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/123642 2016-12-09T02:26:31-05:00 2016-12-09T02:26:31-05:00 @chilled_sake: > Ricetaffy said: > > Ah, sure. I can go ahead... <blockquote> <p>Ricetaffy said:</p> <p>Ah, sure. I can go ahead and translate the pixipedia entry, but I'll try searching for other resources before I do so.</p> </blockquote><p>Oh well, I wasn't precise. I didn't mean to request a translation but was rather asking if the term came <em>from</em> a translation. But I guess one could in fact add to the discussion.</p> chilled_sake /users/463832