tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/13661 Sex tag cleanup project 2017-05-24T17:15:06-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/131757 2017-05-24T17:15:06-04:00 2017-05-24T17:15:06-04:00 @Benit149: Just letting you folks know that I got the... <p>Just letting you folks know that I got the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a> tag up and running with the appropriate wiki changes. If there are any objections before I begin populating it, say them now.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/130586 2017-04-30T18:40:33-04:00 2017-04-30T18:40:33-04:00 @Benit149: That was a stumper for me for a while... <p>That was a stumper for me for a while especially since it occurs so frequently, yet it doesn't fit with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> in the strictest sense, nor are tentacles considered inanimate objects. I agree with there being a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a> tag to cover this.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/130559 2017-04-30T12:13:46-04:00 2017-04-30T12:15:57-04:00 @iridescent_slime: > evazion said: > > Is there a reason we don't... <blockquote> <p>evazion said:</p> <p>Is there a reason we don't have a tag specifically for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a>?</p> </blockquote><p>I did some digging and found that we did in fact have a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a> tag, at least for a little while. If you check out the tag history of <a href="/users?name=FetishFuel">@FetishFuel</a> you will find that for some reason they removed this tag from the following posts:</p><ul> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/245793">post #245793</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/614621">post #614621</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/970732">post #970732</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/976305">post #976305</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/976307">post #976307</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/979663">post #979663</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/981654">post #981654</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/992915">post #992915</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/994067">post #994067</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/997225">post #997225</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1038399">post #1038399</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1057185">post #1057185</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1063692">post #1063692</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1065733">post #1065733</a></li> </ul><p>Personally, I'm in favor of restoring <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a> since we lack any other good tag for it. Tentacles don't fit <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/object_insertion">object insertion</a> but are commonplace enough that they definitely need some kind of tag.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126058 2017-01-25T21:42:43-05:00 2017-01-25T21:42:43-05:00 @reese: That's what I thought. Thanks. <p>That's what I thought. Thanks.</p> reese /users/36716 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126053 2017-01-25T20:51:33-05:00 2017-01-25T20:52:57-05:00 @Benit149: > reese said: > > Does penetrative fingering... <blockquote> <p>reese said:</p> <p>Does penetrative <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fingering">fingering</a> ever count as sex? I would normally say no but when it's the only explicit act (e.g <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1191138">post #1191138</a>), I start to have second thoughts.</p> </blockquote><p>It doesn't. It's considered <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> when a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/penis">penis</a> is inserted, as you would see in the wikis for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a>. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fingering">Fingering</a> is simply a sex act.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126049 2017-01-25T19:38:52-05:00 2017-01-25T19:38:52-05:00 @reese: Does penetrative fingering ever count as sex? I... <p>Does penetrative <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fingering">fingering</a> ever count as sex? I would normally say no but when it's the only explicit act (e.g <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1191138">post #1191138</a>), I start to have second thoughts.</p> reese /users/36716 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126048 2017-01-25T19:18:39-05:00 2017-01-25T19:18:39-05:00 @Rastamepas: I meant without sex but yea. Ok makes sense <p>I meant without <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> but yea. Ok makes sense</p> Rastamepas /users/348646 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126045 2017-01-25T10:41:11-05:00 2017-01-25T10:41:11-05:00 @Benit149: > Rastamepas said: > > So are we assuming that... <blockquote> <p>Rastamepas said:</p> <p>So are we assuming that any sex that doesn't show the sight of penetration as vaginal unless of course it's male, or signs showing it could be anal?</p> </blockquote><blockquote> <p>Kadoya said:</p> <p>Going through my uploads, I think I never added <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a> because, while it's definitely sex, the specific kind was either hard to tell or offscreen. I am finding ones that I clearly missed though.</p> </blockquote><p>That's what I was thinking at first, but then I was wondering if there could be some sort of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/ambiguous_penetration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ambiguous penetration</a> tag made so that it indeed does portray sexual intercourse, but you can't tell which orifice is being penetrated due to the angle of the image. I wouldn't think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/implied_sex">implied sex</a> would work here because in this tag, sex is fully visible rather than implied, but whether it's <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a> is what's debatable here.</p><blockquote> <p>Rastamepas said:</p> <p>Im assuming <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/implied_sex">implied_sex</a> is standalone and should be used with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> right?</p> </blockquote><p>The wiki for implied_sex says that, "There are other visual cues," but at the same time, the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> wiki says to use that tag, "Only for actual vaginal or anal penetration." I'm guessing that you have to actually see the genitalia being penetrated in order for it to qualify as sex on Danbooru. As it stands now from my point of view, implied_sex would not be used together with sex unless both are being portrayed in the same image, like a comic.</p><p>Similar *_sex tags like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/kneepit_sex">kneepit sex</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thigh_sex">thigh sex</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/group_sex">group sex</a> and so on are misnomers because while the word 'sex' is being used, they really don't count as sexual intercourse like vaginal and anal do. I think that implied_sex would fall under this misnomer as well.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126040 2017-01-25T03:08:43-05:00 2017-01-25T03:08:43-05:00 @Rastamepas: Im assuming implied_sex is standalone and... <p>Im assuming <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/implied_sex">implied_sex</a> is standalone and should be used with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> right?</p> Rastamepas /users/348646 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126039 2017-01-25T01:32:47-05:00 2017-01-25T01:32:47-05:00 @Kadoya: Going through my uploads, I think I never added... <p>Going through my uploads, I think I never added <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a> because, while it's definitely sex, the specific kind was either hard to tell or offscreen. I am finding ones that I clearly missed though.</p> Kadoya /users/136247 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126029 2017-01-24T19:20:42-05:00 2017-01-24T21:08:02-05:00 @Rastamepas: I was playing around with sex -anal -vaginal... <p>I was playing around with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> -<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a> -<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a> yesterday. There is a lot of stuff missed. I'll do some now and then but won't be going crazy with it</p><p>So are we assuming that any sex that doesn't show the sight of penetration as vaginal unless of course it's male, or signs showing it could be anal?<br>I.E <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2607755">post #2607755</a><br> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2572018">post #2572018</a><br> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2516790">post #2516790</a></p><p>etc?</p> Rastamepas /users/348646 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126027 2017-01-24T17:16:03-05:00 2017-01-24T17:16:03-05:00 @Benit149: > evazion said: > > Yeah, I don't know about... <blockquote> <p>evazion said:</p> <p>Yeah, I don't know about tagging tentacles as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> either. There's a fair number of posts tagged as <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=tentacles%20sex">tentacles sex</a>, but I don't entirely agree with that. Is there a reason we don't have a tag specifically for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a>?</p> </blockquote><p>I did find the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/penis_tentacles">penis tentacles</a> tag just now, which has no definition or implications/aliases whatsoever. I'm assuming that they're tentacles with arms greatly resembling penises, compared to tentacle arms that are just slimy in appearance or belong to actual cephalopods.</p><p>Would we want to make a clearer distinction between penile tentacles and your run-of-the-mill tentacles, or are they virtually all the same?</p><p>IMHO, I would think that tentacles would be foreign objects, but the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/penis_tentacles">penis tentacles</a> tag makes this discussion even more complicated now that we have penile vs. non-penile tentacles. I would like to go with some kind of separate <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a> tag as a placeholder until we sort this out.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126020 2017-01-24T05:06:58-05:00 2017-01-24T05:06:58-05:00 @evazion: +1, sex is often mistagged so it could use some... <p>+1, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> is often mistagged so it could use some gardening. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hetero">hetero</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/penis">penis</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/censored">censored</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pov">pov</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/group_sex">group sex</a> are some other associated tags that are frequently forgotten.</p><blockquote><p>I'm not quite positive if <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacles">tentacles</a> count as an alternative to penises however.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, I don't know about tagging tentacles as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> either. There's a fair number of posts tagged as <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=tentacles%20sex">tentacles sex</a>, but I don't entirely agree with that. Is there a reason we don't have a tag specifically for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacle_sex">tentacle sex</a>?</p> evazion /users/52664 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/125992 2017-01-23T13:03:25-05:00 2017-01-23T13:03:50-05:00 @Benit149: I will be doing some gardening of the sex tag... <p>I will be doing some gardening of the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> tag so that there aren't any images that would be more suitable for the imminent_* or after_* groups. Any assistance would be appreciated, but there are some things to consider before starting.</p><ul> <li>First off, the search I'm using is <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=sex%20-vaginal%20-anal">sex -vaginal -anal</a> to filter out the correctly tagged images. I'm going from oldest to latest.</li> <li>If a proper sex image doesn't have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a> and/or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a>, please add them. This will denote what type of sex is being portrayed.</li> <li>If there is *_object_insertion, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/paizuri">paizuri</a>, or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/oral">oral</a> sex occurring without vaginal/anal penetration, please remove the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> tag.</li> <ul><li>I'm not quite positive if <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tentacles">tentacles</a> count as an alternative to penises however.</li></ul> <li>There may be some dubious images where you can't tell if it's vaginal or anal. For a male partner, it's always anal. For a female partner, I would most likely go with vaginal unless there's some disagreement, or some kind of tag is made for these ambiguous circumstances.</li> <li>For the imminent_* groups, please add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/imminent_sex">imminent sex</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/imminent_rape">imminent rape</a>, then follow up with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/imminent_vaginal">imminent vaginal</a> and/or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/imminent_anal">imminent anal</a>. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">Sex</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a> can also be present in the same image if both the imminent and actual penetrations are portrayed, such as in a comic.</li> <li>Same idea with the after_* groups, those being <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/after_sex">after sex</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/after_rape">after rape</a>, then follow up with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/after_vaginal">after vaginal</a> and/or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/after_anal">after anal</a>. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">Sex</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal">vaginal</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/anal">anal</a> can also be present in the same image if both the actual penetration and the aftermath are portrayed, such as in a comic.</li> </ul><p>This is to edit out the non-sex images, while categorizing the proper sex images as anal and/or vaginal. After categorizing those, then it's a simple matter of adding in other tags like sexual positions and actions. I've gone through all <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> images and added in <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mating_press">mating press</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=reverse_suspended_congress%20full_nelson">reverse_suspended_congress full_nelson</a>, but it'd make life easier with other sex-related tags if the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> tag was gardened.</p> Benit149 /users/248298