tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/13692 Help me on my quest to make non-safe images into questionable. 2017-02-05T00:25:58-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126419 2017-02-05T00:25:58-05:00 2017-02-05T00:25:58-05:00 @Hillside_Moose: I went through virgin_killer_sweater rating:s... <p>I went through <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=virgin_killer_sweater%20rating%3As">virgin_killer_sweater rating:s</a> and changed some to Questionable, mostly the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wardrobe_error">wardrobe_error</a> ones and a couple of posts that showed a little too much ass. </p><p>But yeah, Danbooru's "safe" rating does not mean worksafe. </p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126411 2017-02-04T19:24:18-05:00 2017-02-04T19:24:59-05:00 @Mikaeri: I don't agree with any of the rating changes... <p>I don't agree with any of the rating changes from <a href="/users?name=l711393">@l711393</a>. Changed them back. As zaregoto said, would advise reading <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link" href="/wiki_pages/howto%3Arate">howto:rate</a>. Continuing to do this otherwise would be vandalism.</p> Mikaeri /users/470449 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126409 2017-02-04T19:18:51-05:00 2017-02-04T19:18:51-05:00 @EB: > Provence said: > > Well, for now I'd agree... <blockquote> <p>Provence said:</p> <p>Well, for now I'd agree with all of their changes, though.</p> </blockquote><p>I'm not so sure. Several of the changes look incorrect to me. A little bit of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sideboob">sideboob</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/butt_crack">butt_crack</a> is not enough to rate something as "questionable". <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2619607">post #2619607</a> should be safe, no question about it IMO.</p> EB /users/11672 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126404 2017-02-04T15:48:50-05:00 2017-02-04T15:48:50-05:00 @user_460797: Well, for now I'd agree with all of their... <p>Well, for now I'd agree with all of their changes, though. </p> user_460797 /users/460797 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126403 2017-02-04T15:47:05-05:00 2017-02-04T15:47:05-05:00 @zaregoto: @l711393 please read howto:rate before updating... <p><a href="/users?name=l711393">@l711393</a> please read <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link" href="/wiki_pages/howto%3Arate">howto:rate</a> before updating the pictures.</p> zaregoto /users/330014 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126395 2017-02-04T11:49:42-05:00 2017-02-04T11:49:42-05:00 @BrokenEagle98: Danbooru Safe != NSFW. The "safeness" is... <p>Danbooru Safe != NSFW.</p><p>The "safeness" is entirely based upon the sexuality of the image. As a quick protip, wrongly changing the rating on a lot of posts counts as vandalism and can get you banned.</p><p>Check <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link" href="/wiki_pages/howto%3Arate">howto:rate</a> for more information.</p> BrokenEagle98 /users/23799 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126394 2017-02-04T11:19:37-05:00 2017-02-04T11:19:37-05:00 @Astolfo: Danbooru just has a really odd definition of... <p>Danbooru just has a really odd definition of "safe" unfortunately. Pretty sure there's been debate about it before.</p> Astolfo /users/385582 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/126393 2017-02-04T11:11:38-05:00 2017-02-04T11:11:38-05:00 @user_505111: I see a lot of images that are defaultly put... <p>I see a lot of images that are defaultly put into the safe-category, the virgin_killer_sweater tag has been a good example for me when I just wanted to browse rating:safe images. Please do people like me the favor of when you see things in the safe-rating that you wouldn't deem 'safe' into at least questionable.</p> user_505111 /users/505111