remove implication rose_petal_bath -> petals
create implication rose_petal_bath -> rose_petals

Link to request

Rose petals handles the implication to petals. Missing the bath implication.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1102 (forum #127247) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Should the tag not be used for things like post #632222 then? No bath there.

I can't shake the feeling that rose_petal_bath is an exceptionally narrow tag that could be duplicated by a rose_petals ~bath ~bathing search. Seems like someone made an admirable effort to populate it, though.

By the way, yuzu_bath is a thing too. Maybe the bath wiki should link to these tags, to raise awareness of them?

kuuderes_shadow said:

Should the tag not be used for things like post #632222 then? No bath there.

One could argue that they're in a large bath, like in an onsen, and the rest of it is outside the image's frame.

iridescent_slime said:

One could argue that they're in a large bath, like in an onsen, and the rest of it is outside the image's frame.

Not visible in the image -> do not tag. And onsen does not implicate bath (and nor should it imo).

P.S. I'm fine with the currently proposed implication

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1102 (forum #127247) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

remove implication rose_petal_bath -> petals
create implication rose_petal_bath -> rose_petals

Link to request

Resubmitting after automatic rejection.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1613 (forum #146254) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

iridescent_slime said:

I can't shake the feeling that rose_petal_bath is an exceptionally narrow tag that could be duplicated by a rose_petals ~bath ~bathing search. Seems like someone made an admirable effort to populate it, though.

I'm satisfied that the tag searches alone are sufficient. If I were still the requester I would reject. Nevertheless I propose just removing the rose_petal_bath tag were applied and tagging rose_petals, bath, or bathing were appropriate.

There's also the petals on water tag that can be used together with the other tags.

chinatsu said:

I'm satisfied that the tag searches alone are sufficient. If I were still the requester I would reject. Nevertheless I propose just removing the rose_petal_bath tag were applied and tagging rose_petals, bath, or bathing were appropriate.

I feel rose petal baths are significant enough to make their own category, but I just realized we also have the petals_on_water tag. (edit: sniped by Unbreakable)

Perhaps these two should be merged? It seems a lot of different people have used them so it's definitely not just a single user's effort, and even if petal baths might not be significant enough to deserve a tag by themselves, petals on water definitely are, as otherwise there'd be no way to find those posts.

petals_on_water is broader and benefits from combo searches with other petal tags such as cherry_blossoms. I think it should be merged.

Alright then, I'll reject the request and if nobody gets to it before tomorrow I'll sort the tags out into a single one and also add rose petals to the pictures missing it.

The bulk update request #1613 (forum #146254) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

create implication petals_on_water -> petals

Link to request

This request however should be fine, since this tag is going to stay.

(Sorry for the double post, I only thought about it immediately after I hit the submit button.)

EDIT: The bulk update request #1657 (forum #146502) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

Shouldn'T the tag be petals on liquid so we are consistent with standing on liquid?

Modified the BUR. Let me know if anything's amiss before I pull the trigger.

That looks fine imo.

The bulk update request #1657 (forum #146502) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

I've moved the posts under rose petal bath tag and also added rose petals where applicable to petals on water.

The tag alias petals_on_water -> petals_on_liquid has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.