tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/13799 Maid_headdress -> frilled_hairband implication? 2017-03-19T21:43:02-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/128538 2017-03-19T21:43:02-04:00 2017-03-19T21:43:02-04:00 @Benit149: > iridescent_slime said: > > Is a maid... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Is a maid headdress really just any frilled hairband worn by a maid? I feel like there's a substantial difference between the hairbands with frills along the edges (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2657991">post #2657991</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2663746">post #2663746</a>) and the ones with a single vertical frill (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2620339">post #2620339</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2661396">post #2661396</a>), with the latter type being the one traditionally associated with French maids. This seems like enough of a visual distinction to separate the tags based on what the headpiece looks like rather than the rest of the character's outfit.</p> </blockquote><p>Yeah, there is the specifically styled one, which I wasn't aware of. It's just that any image of a maid wearing a hairband automatically makes taggers like me use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">maid headdress</a> without thinking about the specific style. I don't know about you, but I'm not interested in going through the trouble to cherry-pick the French maid-styled hairbands out of thousands of maid_headdress posts and migrating them to a new tag.</p><blockquote><p>I've no problem with splitting the tag up as described, except that none of those tags seems like a good match for other types of hairbands like in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2584925">post #2584925</a>. It would still be nice to have a catchall tag for elaborate hairbands that lack lace or frills, even if it isn't called <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a>.</p></blockquote><p>For <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2584925">post #2584925</a>, if it were up to me, I'd make like a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/floral_hairband" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">floral hairband</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/flower_hairband" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">flower hairband</a> type of tag to cover such a specific design. But if a catchall tag would be better than making individual tags for every possible style, which might rarely show up in posts anyway, perhaps ones like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/fancy_hairband" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">fancy hairband</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ornate_hairband" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ornate hairband</a> could work. The wiki would state that the hairband has to have other design elements other than the popular ones like frills, lace and lace trim. These elements could include flowers, baubles, gems, food, etc.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/128509 2017-03-19T04:56:13-04:00 2017-03-19T05:07:00-04:00 @iridescent_slime: > Benit149 said: > > Maid headdress:... <blockquote> <p>Benit149 said:</p> <p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">Maid headdress</a>: Specifically used for when a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid">maid</a> wears one. I'm fine with the current tag name, and aliasing popular synonyms like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/maid_hairband" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">maid_hairband</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headpiece" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">maid_headpiece</a> to it. Whether or not it's frilled or lacy or whatever would need to be tagged separately.</p> </blockquote><p>Is a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">maid headdress</a> really just any frilled hairband worn by a maid? I feel like there's a substantial difference between the hairbands with frills along the edges (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2657991">post #2657991</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2663746">post #2663746</a>) and the ones with a single vertical frill (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2620339">post #2620339</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2661396">post #2661396</a>), with the latter type being the one traditionally associated with French maids. This seems like enough of a visual distinction to separate the tags based on what the headpiece looks like rather than the rest of the character's outfit.</p><blockquote><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">Frilled hairband</a>: If we want to expand this frilled subset to include lace and lace-trimmed hairbands, then I propose that there be three tags made instead of just one; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled_hairband</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lace_hairband" title="This wiki page does not exist">lace_hairband</a>, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lace-trimmed_hairband" title="This wiki page does not exist">lace-trimmed_hairband</a>. A lace_hairband would be entirely composed of lace, while a lace-trimmed_hairband just has lace as trimmings around the hairband. Then whatever else doesn't fit with what I described above (not a lolita or maid) would be a plain frilled_hairband.</p></blockquote><p>I've no problem with splitting the tag up as described, except that none of those tags seems like a good match for other types of hairbands like in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2584925">post #2584925</a>. It would still be nice to have a catchall tag for elaborate hairbands that lack lace or frills, even if it isn't called <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a>.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127985 2017-03-08T11:08:23-05:00 2017-03-08T11:08:38-05:00 @Benit149: I got rid of the 'white frills' part in lolita... <p>I got rid of the 'white frills' part in <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a> so that it's no longer color specific.</p><p>Anyway, after reading through all of these responses and doing some research on Google, my current assertion for the three tags is as such:</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">Lolita hairband</a>: This could go one of two ways. One, that this should be reserved only for the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/gothic_lolita">gothic lolita</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/lolita" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">lolita</a> group since it appears to pertain to that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_fashion">specific fashion style</a>. That would mean some tag gardening to move the non-lolita hairbands to the three I'll describe below.</p><p>Likewise, lolita_hairband can be nuked and moved to a more intuitive tag, like Kuuderes Shadow said. After all, the only object on Danbooru that is labeled as 'lolita' (excluding lolita_fashion) is the hairband. No dress, legwear, lingerie, nothing else. Just the hairband, and I find that rather pointless. By that logic, we either make lolita-related tags to make it fit, or we get rid of lolita_hairband and move the posts to appropriate tags, and I'm all for the latter.</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">Maid headdress</a>: Specifically used for when a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid">maid</a> wears one. I'm fine with the current tag name, and aliasing popular synonyms like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/maid_hairband" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">maid_hairband</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headpiece" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">maid_headpiece</a> to it. Whether or not it's frilled or lacy or whatever would need to be tagged separately.</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">Frilled hairband</a>: If we want to expand this frilled subset to include lace and lace-trimmed hairbands, then I propose that there be three tags made instead of just one; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled_hairband</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lace_hairband" title="This wiki page does not exist">lace_hairband</a>, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lace-trimmed_hairband" title="This wiki page does not exist">lace-trimmed_hairband</a>. A lace_hairband would be entirely composed of lace, while a lace-trimmed_hairband just has lace as trimmings around the hairband. Then whatever else doesn't fit with what I described above (not a lolita or maid) would be a plain frilled_hairband.</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127948 2017-03-07T14:06:26-05:00 2017-03-07T14:07:15-05:00 @iridescent_slime: Upon further reflection, I don't understand why... <p>Upon further reflection, I don't understand why <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a> is defined by having frills at all. Many of the accessories tagged as such have lace trim instead (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3105">post #3105</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/202491">post #202491</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/350650">post #350650</a>) or something else altogether (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1804928">post #1804928</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/rem_%28re%3Azero%29">Rem's</a> hairband). Moreover, a <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="https://www.google.com/search?q=lolita+hairband&amp;tbm=isch">Google Images search</a> turns up more hairbands without frills than with frills. It seems like the real problem here is that the wiki definition is simply far too narrow.</p><p>In light of this, I'm withdrawing my assertion that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled hairband</a> is a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a> duplicate. It seems that there may be quite a few cases where they are exclusive of each other.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127947 2017-03-07T13:55:14-05:00 2017-03-07T13:55:14-05:00 @EB: One problem with implications or aliases,... <p>One problem with implications or aliases, though: are these hairbands always necessarily frilled anyway? <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2542958">post #2542958</a> looks more like lace-trimmed than frilled to me.</p> EB /users/11672 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127945 2017-03-07T13:33:21-05:00 2017-03-07T13:33:21-05:00 @EB: I don't know why the wiki says lolita hairband... <p>I don't know why the wiki says <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a> needs to have white frills. The frills come in all different colors. If you want to be specific about the color, then I have no problem with (color)_frills tags being made.</p><p>Personally I would prefer "maid headdress" to be "maid hairband" to be consistent if we go along with these implications. Makes more sense to me as I tend to think of something larger when I see "headdress" (which a Google image search on the base word bears out).</p> EB /users/11672 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127944 2017-03-07T13:19:07-05:00 2017-03-07T13:19:51-05:00 @user_441999: For intuitiveness, think about it like this.... <p>For intuitiveness, think about it like this. Imagine you asked 10 native English speakers if they knew what a frilled headband is, and another ten if they knew what a lolita hairband is. How many would you expect to answer yes to each? I would expect 10 and 0, respectively. And plenty of strange looks from the first group in an "of course I do" sort of way.</p><p>Plus we have frilled skirt, dress, sleeves, bikini, shirt collar, panties, pillow, legwear, bra, apron, swimsuit, shirt, bow, hat, kimono, collar, gloves, choker, ribbon, capelet, shorts, cuffs, leotard, hair tubes, shawl, umbrella (lol), boots, ascot, blouse, vest, negligee, underwear, innertube, bag, pants, sash, curtains, tabard, jacket, obi and gap (?). If lolita hairband is really just used for any frilled hairband and nothing more then why should that have its own tag which is some relatively obscure term, and one for which half the results of a google image search for the term aren't frilled hairbands to begin with?</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127942 2017-03-07T12:52:15-05:00 2017-03-07T12:52:15-05:00 @user_460797: That's something I don't know much about. I... <p>That's something I don't know much about.<br>I think <a href="/users?name=EB">@EB</a> might know something more here, but it's only a guess. </p> user_460797 /users/460797 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127941 2017-03-07T12:50:22-05:00 2017-03-07T12:50:22-05:00 @Benit149: Okay. So what about maid_headdress? <p>Okay. So what about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">maid_headdress</a>?</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127940 2017-03-07T12:46:02-05:00 2017-03-07T12:46:42-05:00 @user_460797: Well, that argument is flawed, because I wasn't... <p>Well, that argument is flawed, because I wasn't aware of the frilled hairband tag. <br>It also only has 41 tags and the lolita hairband tag is well established with over 4k posts. Just adjust the false definition and maybe aliasing frilled hairband to lolita hairband. </p> user_460797 /users/460797 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127939 2017-03-07T12:44:07-05:00 2017-03-07T12:44:07-05:00 @Benit149: Clearly there needs to be an update since I... <p>Clearly there needs to be an update since I wasn't aware of the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a> tag. If <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled_hairband</a> is a more concrete and intuitive tag name, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">maid_headdresses</a> are frilled as well, and the wiki for lolita_hairband is strangely color specific, then should the request look like this?</p><p>imply frilled_hairband -&gt; hairband<br>imply frilled_hairband -&gt; frills<br>imply lolita_hairband -&gt; frilled_hairband<br>imply maid_headdress -&gt; frilled_hairband<br>update wiki for lolita_hairband</p><p>Or like this?</p><p>imply frilled_hairband -&gt; hairband<br>imply frilled_hairband -&gt; frills<br>alias lolita_hairband -&gt; frilled_hairband<br>alias maid_headdress -&gt; frilled_hairband<br>nuke wiki for lolita_hairband and maid_headdress</p> Benit149 /users/248298 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127938 2017-03-07T12:25:50-05:00 2017-03-07T12:25:50-05:00 @user_460797: Why should we make a distinction based of... <p>Why should we make a distinction based of colors? That looks like a very constructed seperation that only creates a new tag which is already covered by an established one. </p> user_460797 /users/460797 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127937 2017-03-07T12:22:30-05:00 2017-03-07T12:22:30-05:00 @iridescent_slime: > kuuderes_shadow said: > > Lolita hairband... <blockquote> <p>kuuderes_shadow said:</p> <p>Lolita hairband says the frills have to be white. The likes of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2053452">post #2053452</a> (the only time I've used this tag), <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2651051">post #2651051</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2573912">post #2573912</a> don't have white frills.</p> </blockquote><p>Either the wiki is wrong or the vast majority of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/suigintou">suigintou</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/tokisaki_kurumi">tokisaki kurumi</a> posts are mistagged. I'm inclined to go with the former, since we've been using the tag for hairbands with nonwhite frills since long before that wiki definition existed. Either way, the color of the frills is such a trivial distinction. Is this really worth maintaining a separate tag?</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127936 2017-03-07T12:03:44-05:00 2017-03-07T12:03:44-05:00 @user_441999: > iridescent_slime said: > > Why do we even... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Why do we even have a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled hairband</a> tag? It looks like a duplicate of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a>.</p> </blockquote><p>Lolita hairband says the frills have to be white. The likes of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2053452">post #2053452</a> (the only time I've used this tag), <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2651051">post #2651051</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2573912">post #2573912</a> don't have white frills.</p><p>Plus frilled hairband is a more intuitive tag name.</p> user_441999 /users/441999 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127935 2017-03-07T11:58:02-05:00 2017-03-07T11:58:02-05:00 @iridescent_slime: Why do we even have a frilled hairband tag? It... <p>Why do we even have a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled hairband</a> tag? It looks like a duplicate of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lolita_hairband">lolita hairband</a>.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/127928 2017-03-07T11:05:08-05:00 2017-03-07T11:05:08-05:00 @Benit149: Since the wiki for maid_headdress says it's a... <p>Since the wiki for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/maid_headdress">maid_headdress</a> says it's a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frills">frilled</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hairband">hairband</a>, and the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frilled_hairband">frilled_hairband</a> tag itself was made, would it be necessary to imply maid_headdress to frilled_hairband?</p> Benit149 /users/248298