[APPROVED] Tag implication: blindfold_slip -> blindfold

@DanbooruBot: The tag implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold...

2017-06-24T00:52:43-04:00

The tag implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold has been approved.

@Hillside_Moose: I wouldn't get sleep_mask mixed up with...

2017-06-24T00:52:29-04:00

I wouldn't get sleep_mask mixed up with blindfold_pull. That just invites confusion. Maybe slippage could be tagged with mask_pull, I dunno.

Either way, seems like there's no conflicting tags, so going ahead with it.

@fossilnix: Is there anything that could be used as a...

2017-06-12T12:36:53-04:00

Is there anything that could be used as a blindfold, and slip, that blindfold_slip would cover, but would not qualify as a blindfold?

For example, the blindfold wiki directs users to tag sleeping mask for the blindfolds used to sleep. Sleeping mask's wiki calls it a type of blindfold, but there's no implication...so if we're keeping these tags separate (should we?), and a sleeping mask were to slip, would it be appropriate to tag it with blindfold_slip, or a different tag?

@user_445173: Makes sense, if there's blindfold slipping,...

2017-06-12T12:07:33-04:00

Makes sense, if there's blindfold slipping, obviously there's blindfold. +1

@user_509825: create implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold ...

2017-06-12T12:00:50-04:00

create implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold

Link to implication

Looks like a subset.

The tag implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold has been approved.