tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/14200[REJECTED] One-piece thong2017-07-12T01:02:07-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1336742017-07-12T01:02:07-04:002017-07-12T01:02:07-04:00@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #1225 has been rejected.<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1225">bulk update request #1225</a> has been rejected.</p>DanbooruBot/users/502584tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1336732017-07-12T01:02:00-04:002017-07-12T01:02:00-04:00@Hillside_Moose: Replaced thong_one-piece_swimsuit with...<p>Replaced <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/thong_one-piece_swimsuit" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a> with <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=one-piece_thong%20one-piece_swimsuit">one-piece_thong one-piece_swimsuit</a>.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1333482017-07-04T11:40:16-04:002017-07-04T11:40:16-04:00@iridescent_slime: * The additional implication to swimsuit is...<ul>
<li>The additional implication to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/swimsuit">swimsuit</a> is redundant, as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one-piece_swimsuit">one-piece_swimsuit</a> already implicates <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/swimsuit">swimsuit</a>.</li>
<li>Only 27 posts isn't really enough to justify the overhead of an implication. Manual tagging or a tag script makes more sense at this scale.</li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=Thong_one-piece_swimsuit">Thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a> serves no apparent purpose that can't be accomplished with existing tags. All it does is replicate a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=one-piece_thong%20one-piece_swimsuit">one-piece_thong one-piece_swimsuit</a> search.</li>
</ul><p>In light of the last point, I suggest instead that we remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=thong_one-piece_swimsuit">thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a> altogether. We have a long-standing policy of eliminating combination tags that do nothing other tags can't already do, and that certainly seems to be the case here.</p>iridescent_slime/users/438068tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1333472017-07-04T11:26:55-04:002017-07-04T12:23:10-04:00@BrokenEagle98: I removed create implication...<p>I removed <code>create implication thong_one-piece_swimsuit -> swimsuit</code> from the above implication as it was superfluous (one-piece_swimsuit already implicates swimsuit).</p><p>Having said that, I'm not sure about the veracity of the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one-piece_thong">one-piece_thong</a> tag when we already have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong_leotard">thong leotard</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/thong_one-piece_swimsuit" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a>.</p><p>As a side note, I'm going to submit an issue on GitHub so that superfluous implications like the above are not allowed.</p><h5>Edit:</h5><p>Created <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-github-id-link" href="https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru/issues/3200">issue #3200</a>.</p>BrokenEagle98/users/23799tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1333462017-07-04T10:56:23-04:002017-07-12T01:02:07-04:00@vogory: create implication thong_one-piece_swimsuit ->...<p>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/thong_one-piece_swimsuit" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one-piece_thong">one-piece_thong</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/thong_one-piece_swimsuit" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one-piece_swimsuit">one-piece_swimsuit</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/thong_one-piece_swimsuit" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">thong_one-piece_swimsuit</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/swimsuit">swimsuit</a></p><p><a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1225">Link to request</a></p><p>There are two tags for the same (more or less) thing: thong_one-piece_swimsuit and one-piece_thong. The first one doesn't have any description, while second one states that it's related either to swimsuit or to leotard. And thong_one-piece_swimsuit doesn't implicate any generic or special swimsuit tags.</p><p>One needs some clarification here. Something like I've proposed or anything more suitable.</p><p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1225">bulk update request #1225</a> has been rejected.</p>vogory/users/469692