[REJECTED] [Bulk] Numbers (Lyrical Nanoha)

@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #1346 (forum #137512)...

2018-04-27T14:45:25-04:00

The bulk update request #1346 (forum #137512) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

@DanbooruBot: This bulk update request has been rejected...

2018-04-27T14:45:25-04:00

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

@紫希貴: I know nothing about Nanoha but the Numbers...

2017-10-16T18:44:00-04:00

I know nothing about Nanoha but the Numbers wiki page says they are villains... so they are like jikan sokougun, sangvis ferri, and shinkaisei-kan? If yes then for that reason I believe the tag should still exist.

@BrokenEagle98: I guess those are things... doesn't change my...

2017-10-16T18:10:53-04:00

I guess those are things... doesn't change my opinion though. But I'm only one vote, so...

@G-SANtos: > BrokenEagle98 said: > > I still see no...

2017-10-16T17:44:13-04:00

BrokenEagle98 said:

I still see no reason for such tags. To give an example, it'd be the same as adding the school tags or team tags to the various Girls und Panzer groups whenever they appear together in the same image. The same for any number of other series. It's like a shorthand grouping of character tags... which I thought wasn't supposed to be a thing...?

Considering most Idolmaster units' Wiki pages were created by Builders, and one even by a Moderator, I would say that this means tags for named groups are acceptable, or else they would have nuked those on sight.

@BrokenEagle98: I still see no reason for such tags. To give...

2017-10-16T17:20:21-04:00

I still see no reason for such tags. To give an example, it'd be the same as adding the school tags or team tags to the various Girls und Panzer groups whenever they appear together in the same image. The same for any number of other series. It's like a shorthand grouping of character tags... which I thought wasn't supposed to be a thing...?

@G-SANtos: > BrokenEagle98 said: > > +1 No need for a...

2017-10-16T16:50:03-04:00

BrokenEagle98 said:

+1 No need for a group tag. It should be nuked once those implications are removed.

There are many groups with tags, such as knights of the round table (fate), lipps (idolmaster) and other Idolmaster units, royal knights (which is oddly a character tag), etc. The existence of those tags makes me believe we should keep the group tag and use it when the group is together is the same image, it just shoulnd't be an umbrella tag.

@BrokenEagle98: +1 No need for a group tag. It should be...

2017-10-16T16:41:28-04:00

+1 No need for a group tag. It should be nuked once those implications are removed. Also, +1 to updating the qualifiers.

Also just an idea, but if we move all of those tags over to the new qualifier, than those implications will no longer matter.

@G-SANtos: remove implication tre_(nanoha) ->...

2017-10-12T22:33:34-04:00

Link to request

It makes no sense that all the Numbers are implicated to the group tag when we don't do this to any other group. Maybe it's something that was thought to be a good idea back in the day, when Danbooru had lower quality standards, and no one bothered to undo it the same way we don't delete bad quality artworks from before the quality standards existed. Or someone was trying to bypass the 2 tag limit, but I'm not sure if that makes sense here.

Anyway, those implications need to be removed. After that I might request a bulk update to move the (nanoha) parsers to (lyrical_nanoha), but I haven't decided yet.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1346 (forum #137512) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.