tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/1490 Tag Alias: earphones/headphones. Tag implication: earbuds -> headphones. 2009-01-07T17:28:05-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13616 2009-01-07T17:28:05-05:00 2009-01-07T17:28:05-05:00 @NWF_Renim: When I think earpiece I imagine something like... <p>When I think earpiece I imagine something like the Secret Service use or agents use in the Matrix. As for the cell phone ones, the ones I've seen sold are labeled as hands free headsets.</p><p>Personally I think the earphones images should be divided between earbuds and headphones, I don't see a particular reason to be using earphones.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13613 2009-01-07T16:37:08-05:00 2009-01-07T16:37:08-05:00 @r0d3n7z: To top it all off, there's also a earpiece tag... <p>To top it all off, there's also a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/earpiece">earpiece</a> tag in use out there, with wiki page and a solitary image.</p> r0d3n7z /users/23205 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13607 2009-01-07T13:10:56-05:00 2009-01-07T13:11:39-05:00 @Shinjidude: Well technically we could get really technical... <p>Well technically we could get really technical and start breaking <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/headphones">headphones</a> out into <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/circumaural_headphones" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">circumaural_headphones</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/supra-aural_headphones" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">supra-aural_headphones</a>; seperate the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/canalphones" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">canalphones</a> from <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/earbuds">earbuds</a>; and then re-instate <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/earphone" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">earphone</a> as a supra-aural_headphone with no band. Is it really worth it though?</p><p>Surprisingly even after breaking all these apart there would probably still be plenty in each category. Headphone pics are popular for some reason.</p><p>I'm happy with it as it stands.</p> Shinjidude /users/1002 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13605 2009-01-07T13:02:47-05:00 2009-01-07T13:02:47-05:00 @homeless_homo: > jxh2154 said: > I don't think we need three... <blockquote><p>jxh2154 said:<br>I don't think we need three different tags though. Anything that goes inside the ear instead of over it, *usually* but not always with both sides not connected to each other, should be one tag, while normal <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/headphones">headphones</a> get the tag they've always gotten. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/earphones">earphones</a> just needs some cleanup, as it currently has both.</p></blockquote><p>Personally, since they are three different things, it would seem only right to tag them correctly. However, I don't search for either of the three tags so I could care less.</p> homeless_homo /users/10355 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13602 2009-01-07T12:37:55-05:00 2009-01-07T12:37:55-05:00 @jxh2154: > homeless_homo said: I say earphones = > And... <blockquote><p>homeless_homo said: I say earphones =<br>And earbuds = </p></blockquote><p>I don't think we need three different tags though. Anything that goes inside the ear instead of over it, *usually* but not always with both sides not connected to each other, should be one tag, while normal <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/headphones">headphones</a> get the tag they've always gotten. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/earphones">earphones</a> just needs some cleanup, as it currently has both.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13584 2009-01-07T00:02:09-05:00 2009-01-07T00:02:09-05:00 @homeless_homo: I say earphones =... <p>I say earphones =<br><a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link" href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/wp-content/uploads2/2008/06/sony-dr-bt140qp-bluetooth-edr-rechargeable-earphones.jpg">http://nexus404.com/Blog/wp-content/uploads2/2008/06/sony-dr-bt140qp-bluetooth-edr-rechargeable-earphones.jpg</a></p><p>And earbuds = <br><a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link" href="http://www.ideawow.com/catalog/earphone_b-01.jpg">http://www.ideawow.com/catalog/earphone_b-01.jpg</a></p> homeless_homo /users/10355 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13574 2009-01-06T21:09:08-05:00 2009-01-06T21:09:27-05:00 @paninaro: > Shinjidude said: > Prescriptive vs.... <blockquote><p>Shinjidude said:<br>Prescriptive vs. descriptive linguistics, etc... I'd go with Google, Wikipedia, and what I'd consider common use and keep earphone/earbuds distinct from headphones for all the reasons stated.</p></blockquote><p>So we go with earbuds=earphones and headphones are different, from wikipedia and the google statistics? I'm OK with that. ^_^</p><p>I disagree, though, that wikipedia is not prescriptive. It is more easily updated, but that is just a matter of degree.</p> paninaro /users/98003 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13551 2009-01-06T15:30:17-05:00 2009-01-06T15:30:17-05:00 @jxh2154: I vote to just keep them separate. They both... <p>I vote to just keep them separate. They both create very different visuals as they're used in art.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13536 2009-01-06T13:23:45-05:00 2009-01-06T13:23:45-05:00 @Shinjidude: I don't know that dictonary.com (or any other... <p>I don't know that dictonary.com (or any other single dictionary) was a good source to begin with. Prescriptive vs. descriptive linguistics, etc... I'd go with Google, Wikipedia, and what I'd consider common use and keep earphone/earbuds distinct from headphones for all the reasons stated.</p> Shinjidude /users/1002 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13518 2009-01-06T09:40:40-05:00 2009-01-06T09:41:02-05:00 @paninaro: > homeless_homo said: > Get over it.Calm down.... <blockquote><p>homeless_homo said:<br>Get over it.</p></blockquote><p>Calm down. There is nothing to get over since whis was never about opinions but about definitions. Some sources define it the same, and some don't. You just repeated exactly what was in NWF_Renim's post. </p> paninaro /users/98003 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13517 2009-01-06T08:50:13-05:00 2009-01-06T08:50:13-05:00 @homeless_homo: Headphones and Earbuds/earphones are not the... <p>Headphones and Earbuds/earphones are not the same thing. Get over it. Headphones are held in place by a strap over the head and usually cover the entire ear. Earbuds are inserted into the ear and do not need a headband to be held in place. Earphones on the other hand can cover the entire ear, but not need a band going over the head.</p> homeless_homo /users/10355 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13515 2009-01-06T08:06:34-05:00 2009-01-06T08:30:06-05:00 @paninaro: And according to wikipedia, earphones and... <p>And according to wikipedia, earphones and earbuds are the same thing, and they are headphones, but not all headphones are earphones. </p><p>Urgh, seems like this nomenclature is as ambiguous as can be, since even not even Merriam-Webster and Random House are in agreement, so forget I said anything from the start. ^_~</p> paninaro /users/98003 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13513 2009-01-06T07:33:51-05:00 2009-01-06T07:33:51-05:00 @NWF_Renim: From Merriam-Webster Dictionary Earbud: a small... <p>From Merriam-Webster Dictionary<br><strong>Earbud:</strong> a small earphone inserted into the ear.<br><strong>Headphone:</strong> an earphone held over the ear by a band worn on the head —usually used in plural.<br><strong>Earphone:</strong> a device that converts electrical energy into sound waves and is worn over or inserted into the ear.</p><p>From American Heritage Dictionary<br><strong>Headphone</strong>: A receiver, as for a telephone, radio, or stereo, held to the ear by a headband.<br><strong>Earphone</strong>: A device that converts electric signals, as from a telephone, stereo, or radio receiver, to audible sound and fits over or in the ear. Also called a earpiece. </p><p>Going by these definitions both headphones and earbuds are earphones, but earbuds would not be considered headphones.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13505 2009-01-06T05:35:06-05:00 2009-01-06T05:36:33-05:00 @paninaro: Headphones and earphones are the same thing... <p>Headphones and earphones are the same thing according to dictionary.com, which should carry more weight than any google searches.</p><p>But even so, an implication earbuds-&gt;headphones and, if you will, alias earbuds/earphones is better than nothing.</p> paninaro /users/98003 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13504 2009-01-06T05:31:08-05:00 2009-01-06T05:31:08-05:00 @r0d3n7z: They are different -- Headphones are like post... <p>They are different -- Headphones are like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/382781">post #382781</a>. Earphones/earbuds are like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/306685">post #306685</a>. If you plug "earphones" and "headphones" respectively into google image search, you'll see what I mean. </p><p>Stuff just needs to be retagged correctly.</p> r0d3n7z /users/23205 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/13502 2009-01-06T05:25:21-05:00 2009-01-07T17:28:06-05:00 @paninaro: "Headphones" and "earphones" are synonymous,... <p>"Headphones" and "earphones" are synonymous, and earbuds are a type of headphones.</p> paninaro /users/98003