[REJECTED] Tag implication: >o< -> :o

@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #1485 (forum #143313)...

2018-04-27T14:45:51-04:00

The bulk update request #1485 (forum #143313) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

@DanbooruBot: This bulk update request has been rejected...

2018-04-27T14:45:51-04:00

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

@DanbooruBot: The tag implication >o< -> :o (forum #143307)...

2018-04-27T14:44:16-04:00

The tag implication >o< -> :o (forum #143307) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

@DanbooruBot: This tag implication has been rejected because...

2018-04-27T14:44:16-04:00

This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

@user_525419: > iridescent_slime said: > > I'm just stating...

2018-02-22T17:33:15-05:00

iridescent_slime said:

I'm just stating a fact. The wiki was created less than a day ago, but the tag has been used for :d faces for over two years. How can it be "wrong usage" when the tag is undefined?

Simply: It isn't really intuitive if we already have another tag for the smiling faces: xd.
And that tag's wiki was created 8 years ago. Even if one tag has no clear definition before, this tag had one and should make clear how to use these two tags...Meaning we have to do re-tagging.

@iridescent_slime: > Provence said: > > Why is the wiki wrong? >...

2018-02-22T17:26:31-05:00

Provence said:

Why is the wiki wrong?
If it's a :d face then xd is to be used. It's wrong usage then.

I'm just stating a fact. The wiki was created less than a day ago, but the tag has been used for :d faces for over two years. How can it be "wrong usage" when the tag is undefined?

@user_525419: > iridescent_slime said: > > -1 > > >o< is...

2018-02-22T14:40:40-05:00

iridescent_slime said:

-1

>o< is used for :d faces even more frequently than :o faces. The wiki is wrong.

Why is the wiki wrong?
If it's a :d face then xd is to be used. It's wrong usage then.

@Unbreakable: > iridescent_slime said: > > -1 > > >o< is...

2018-02-22T13:26:32-05:00

iridescent_slime said:

-1

>o< is used for :d faces even more frequently than :o faces.

Which I think is really weird, just throwing it out there.

@iridescent_slime: -1 >o< is used for :d faces even more...

2018-02-22T13:17:37-05:00

-1

>o< is used for :d faces even more frequently than :o faces. The wiki is wrong.

@user_441999: > fossilnix said: > > create alias xo -> >o< >...

2018-02-22T12:52:39-05:00

fossilnix said:

create alias xo -> >o<

Link to request

Or the other way around. It's the same expression: >_< eyes and an open, approximately round mouth

I'd prefer the other way around, myself (which would mean the thread's initial implication would need changing as well). It's consistent with xd and x3 (and a couple of other rarer ones), whereas the only other one between the >< signs is >3< which doesn't work with an x* tag.

@fossilnix: create alias xo -> >o< Link to request Or the...

2018-02-22T10:05:58-05:00

create alias xo -> >o<

Link to request

Or the other way around. It's the same expression: >_< eyes and an open, approximately round mouth

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1485 (forum #143313) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

@Hellbus: create implication >o< -> :o Link to...

2018-02-22T07:18:45-05:00

create implication >o< -> :o

Link to implication

>_< + :o = >o<

It already implicates >_<.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication >o< -> :o (forum #143307) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.