tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/15211 symbol-shaped pupils vs. symbols in pupils 2018-05-17T06:09:36-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/147063 2018-05-17T06:09:36-04:00 2018-05-17T06:09:36-04:00 @ion288: Pupil symbols suggest pupil shaped symbols.... <p>Pupil symbols suggest pupil shaped symbols. Pupil hearts brings to mind hearts made of pupils (shuder). </p><p>I vote for *_pupils as it feels like more natural english.</p> ion288 /users/190759 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/147049 2018-05-16T22:54:02-04:00 2018-05-16T22:54:02-04:00 @Laethiel: The best potential tag names I've come up with... <p>The best potential tag names I've come up with so far are *_pupils or pupil_*. So:</p><ul> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/symbol_pupils" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">symbol_pupils</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/heart_pupils" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">heart_pupils</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/star_pupils" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">star_pupils</a></li> </ul><ul> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/pupil_symbols" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">pupil_symbols</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/pupil_hearts" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">pupil_hearts</a></li> <li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/pupil_stars" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">pupil_stars</a></li> </ul><p>Of the two, I think the second (pupil_*) is better. Any thoughts, or other ideas?</p> Laethiel /users/40740 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/146399 2018-04-28T21:11:55-04:00 2018-04-28T21:12:53-04:00 @user_525419: There are actually two tags that are describing... <p>There are actually two tags that are describing this scenario:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/heart_in_eye">Heart in eye</a> seems to be used when te heart is anywhere in the eye EXCEPT the pupils. I've used this tag before.<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/heart-shaped_pupils">Heart-Shaped_Pupils</a> when the pupil itself is a heart or the heart is in the pupils.</p><p>I think any more specification would make tagging an utter hassle.</p> user_525419 /users/525419 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/146397 2018-04-28T21:04:01-04:00 2018-04-28T21:04:01-04:00 @Gollgagh: That tag name has always bothered the fuck out... <p>That tag name has always bothered the fuck out of me. In my experience, the hearts are almost never actually the pupil shape.</p> Gollgagh /users/214837 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/146396 2018-04-28T20:55:54-04:00 2018-04-28T20:55:54-04:00 @Unbreakable: Would this necessitate a change of the tag name... <p>Would this necessitate a change of the tag name to better reflect the usage?</p> Unbreakable /users/430030 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/146395 2018-04-28T20:27:27-04:00 2018-04-28T20:27:27-04:00 @user_525419: This would make sense. Tbh. you have to look... <p>This would make sense.<br>Tbh. you have to look extremely close to get this "right"...</p> user_525419 /users/525419 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/146394 2018-04-28T20:25:32-04:00 2018-04-28T20:25:32-04:00 @Laethiel: According to the wiki for heart-shaped pupils,... <p>According to the wiki for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/heart-shaped_pupils">heart-shaped pupils</a>, "This doesn't apply if there are hearts within the pupils". But in practice, there are plenty of examples of exactly that within the first page of results: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3105644">post #3105644</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3105629">post #3105629</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3105255">post #3105255</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3104675">post #3104675</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3104671">post #3104671</a>. This has come up before in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/6921">topic #6921</a> ("Non-pupil hearts in eyes") and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/10373">topic #10373</a> ("Symbols in eyes that are not symbol-shaped_pupils"). From that second topic, we have the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/symbol_in_eye">symbol_in_eye</a> tag, but it's underpopulated, whereas <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/symbol-shaped_pupils">symbol-shaped pupils</a> has 31k, of which <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/heart-shaped_pupils">heart-shaped pupils</a> covers almost 20k.</p><p>Looking at some of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/star-shaped_pupils">star-shaped pupils</a>, the same thing occurs: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3098958">post #3098958</a> (star in pupil), <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3105020">post #3105020</a> (star in pupil, even if the pupil isn't as clearly defined), <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3092341">post #3092341</a> (star in pupil and jutting out).</p><p>Barring a huge tag gardening effort, I think the most reasonable solution would be to expand the definition of symbol-shaped pupils and its subsets to include symbols in pupils, since they're being widely used that way already.</p> Laethiel /users/40740