create implication anal_beads -> sex_toy
create implication artificial_vagina -> sex_toy
create implication butt_plug -> sex_toy
create implication aneros -> sex_toy
create implication cock_ring -> sex_toy
create implication dildo -> sex_toy
create implication urethral_beads -> sex_toy
create implication vibrator -> sex_toy
create implication bunny_vibrator -> vibrator
create implication bunny_vibrator -> dildo
create implication public_vibrator -> vibrator
create implication public_vibrator -> public
create implication vibrator_in_anus -> vibrator
create implication vibrator_in_anus -> anal_object_insertion
create implication vibrator_on_nipple -> vibrator
create implication vibrator_on_penis -> vibrator
create implication vibrator_under_clothes -> vibrator

Link to request

There was some uncertainty over the vibrator_under_clothes -> vibrator implication when I brought it up on Discord (mostly due the "tag what you see" policy) but since remote_control_vibrator implies vibrator I don't see why this would pose a problem. I am open to arguments against it, though.

Other than that I hope this is fairly self-explanatory.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1711 (forum #147735) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Since no one else wants to say it, I will: the "sex toy" concept is exceedingly broad for a tag as it refers to any number of objects that have next to nothing in common other than being used for getting people off. To me, it doesn't make sense to have an umbrella tag for such a disjointed group of tags as these; anal beads and artificial vaginas look nothing alike and are used in completely different ways, so where's the logic in putting them together under one tag? Not to mention the minefield of other, less common masturbatory aids like sex dolls, penis pumps, or electrostim devices. Better to purge the tag entirely and let people use tag_group:sex_objects for finding related tags if necessary.

sex toy is more a genre of porn than just an umbrella tag, but i don't get the argument umbrella tags should only be used for very similar things in the first place. tags are for searching, not for compiling immaculate catalog of visually similar items.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1711 (forum #147735) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

If people are searching for sex_toy, we could create a tag that functions like legwear right?