create implication ortlinde_(fate/grand_order) -> valkyrie_(fate/grand_order)
create implication hildr_(fate/grand_order) -> valkyrie_(fate/grand_order)
create implication thrud_(fate/grand_order) -> valkyrie_(fate/grand_order)

Link to request

The Valkyrie Servant is divided into the three above mentioned characters.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1747 (forum #148907) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

Is it too early to consider making an (all) tag for Scathach? She's almost at 3K images and is quite popular and since Okita Souji has one at 2.3K...

Scathach will need an _(all) tag, with scathach_(fate/grand_order) for the OG appearance. Better get this cleaned up now before it gets out of control.

I'm not aware of all the Scathach variants, so if someone could edit the BUR with the appropriate mass-edits, that would be swell.

create implication scathach_(fate/grand_order) -> scathach_(fate)_(all)
create implication scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> scathach_(fate)_(all)
create implication scathach_skadi_(fate/grand_order) -> scathach_(fate)_(all)

Link to request

Removed Scathach Skadi from the opening BUR and moved it to this one.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1753 (forum #149030) has failed: Error: scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) already implies scathach_(fate)_(all) through another implication (create implication scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> scathach_(fate)_(all))

EDIT: The bulk update request #1753 (forum #149030) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

Don't forget to clean up all the scathach_(fate/grand_order) tags on her scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) posts later too.

Unbreakable said:

Don't forget to clean up all the scathach_(fate/grand_order) tags on her scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) posts later too.

That would mean deimplicating scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) from scathach_(fate/grand_order) first. I added it to the Scathach BUR list.

Benit149 said:

That would mean deimplicating scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) from scathach_(fate/grand_order) first. I added it to the Scathach BUR list.

That's the point with the (all) tags so, it was mostly a reminder.

The bulk update request #1747 (forum #148907) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

The bulk update request #1753 (forum #149030) has failed: Error: scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) already implies scathach_(fate)_(all) through another implication (create implication scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> scathach_(fate)_(all))

I think you need to make the implication removal first before doing the others.

remove implication scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> scathach_(fate/grand_order)

Link to request

Doing it here.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1754 (forum #149052) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

The bulk update request #1754 (forum #149052) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

The bulk update request #1753 (forum #149030) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

I'm trying to change scathach_(fate)_(all) into a character tag, but it's not working.

Benit149 said:

I'm trying to change scathach_(fate)_(all) into a character tag, but it's not working.

It's because the count is too high, you need a BULK update or an admin to change it.